Abstract
Mechanical heart valve prostheses are often implanted in young patients due to their durability and long-term reliability. However, existing designs are known to induce elevated levels of blood damage and blood platelet activation. As a result, there is a need for patients to undergo chronic anti-coagulation treatment to prevent thrombosis, often resulting in bleeding complications. Furthermore, recent studies have suggested that the implantation of a mechanical prosthetic valve at the mitral position results in a significant alteration of the left ventricular flow field which may contribute to flow turbulence. This study proposes a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve design (Bio-MHV) that mimics the geometry of a human mitral valve, with the aim of reducing turbulence levels in the left ventricle by replicating physiological flow patterns. An in vitro three-dimensional particle velocimetry imaging experiment was carried out to compare the hemodynamic performance of the Bio-MHV with that of the clinically established ATS valve. The Bio-MHV was found to replicate physiological left ventricular flow patterns and produced lower turbulence levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alemu Y, Bluestein D (2007) Flow-induced platelet activation and damage accumulation in a mechanical heart valve: numerical studies. Artif Organs 31(9):677–688. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00446.x
Alemu Y, Girdhar G, Xenos M, Sheriff J, Jesty J, Einav S, Bluestein D (2010) Design optimization of a mechanical heart valve for reducing valve thrombogenicity—a case study with ATS valve. ASAIO J 56(5):389–396. doi:10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181e65bf9
Cantwell BJ (1981) Organized motion in turbulent flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13(1):457–515. doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.13.010181.002325
Dasi LP, Ge L, Simon HA, Sotiropoulos F, Yoganathan AP (2007) Vorticity dynamics of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in an axisymmetric aorta. Phys Fluids 19(6):067105. doi:10.1063/1.2743261
Faludi R, Szulik M, D’Hooge J, Herijgers P, Rademakers F, Pedrizzetti G, Voigt JU (2010) Left ventricular flow patterns in healthy subjects and patients with prosthetic mitral valves: an in vivo study using echocardiographic particle image velocimetry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(6):1501–1510. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.060
Ge L, Dasi LP, Sotiropoulos F, Yoganathan AP (2008) Characterization of hemodynamic forces induced by mechanical heart valves: Reynolds vs. viscous stresses. Ann Biomed Eng 36(2):276–297. doi:10.1007/s10439-007-9411-x
Gharib M, Rambod E, Kheradvar A, Sahn DJ, Dabiri JO (2006) Optimal vortex formation as an index of cardiac health. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(16):6305–6308
Govindarajan V, Udaykumar HS, Chandran KB (2009) Flow dynamic comparison between recessed hinge and open pivot bi-leaflet heart valve designs. J Mech Med Biol 9(2):161–176. doi:10.1142/S0219519409002912
Grigioni M, Daniele C, D’Avenio G, Barbaro V (1999) A discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis related to Reynolds shear stress. J Biomech 32(10):1107–1112
Ikonomidis JS, Kratz JM, Crumbley AJ 3rd, Stroud MR, Bradley SM, Sade RM, Crawford FA Jr (2003) Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(6):2022–2031. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.005
Jafri SM (2004) Periprocedural thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy. Am Heart J 147(1):3–15
Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94
Kaneko T, Aranki S, Javed Q, McGurk S, Shekar P, Davidson M, Cohn L (2014) Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(1):117–126. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.028
Leo HL, He Z, Ellis JT, Yoganathan AP (2002) Microflow fields in the hinge region of the CarboMedics bileaflet mechanical heart valve design. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124(3):561–574
Li CP, Lo CW, Lu PC (2010) Estimation of viscous dissipative stresses induced by a mechanical heart valve using PIV data. Ann Biomed Eng 38(3):903–916. doi:10.1007/s10439-009-9867-y
Li CP, Chen SF, Lo CW, Lu PC (2011) Turbulence characteristics downstream of a new trileaflet mechanical heart valve. ASAIO J 57(3):188–196. doi:10.1097/MAT.0b013e318213f9c2
Moidl R, Simon P, Wolner E, Trial O-XPHV (2002) The On-X prosthetic heart valve at five years. Ann Thorac Surg 74(4):S1312–S1317
Nollert G, Miksch J, Kreuzer E, Reichart B (2003) Risk factors for atherosclerosis and the degeneration of pericardial valves after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(4):965–968. doi:10.1016/S0022
Pedrizzetti G, Domenichini F (2005) Nature optimizes the swirling flow in the human left ventricle. Phys Rev Lett 95(10):108101
Pedrizzetti G, Domenichini F, Tonti G (2010) On the left ventricular vortex reversal after mitral valve replacement. Ann Biomed Eng 38(3):769–773. doi:10.1007/s10439-010-9928-2
Pedrizzetti G, La Canna G, Alfieri O, Tonti G (2014) The vortex-an early predictor of cardiovascular outcome? Nat Rev Cardiol 11(9):545–553
Pottebaum TS, Gharib M (2004) The pinch-off process in a starting buoyant plume. Exp Fluids 37(1):87–94. doi:10.1007/s00348-004-0788-0
Puskas J, Gerdisch M, Nichols D, Quinn R, Anderson C, Rhenman B, Investigators P (2014) Reduced anticoagulation after mechanical aortic valve replacement: interim results from the prospective randomized on-X valve anticoagulation clinical trial randomized food and drug administration investigational device exemption trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(4):1202–1210. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.004
Quinlan NJ, Dooley PN (2007) Models of flow-induced loading on blood cells in laminar and turbulent flow, with application to cardiovascular device flow. Ann Biomed Eng 35(8):1347–1356. doi:10.1007/s10439-007-9308-8
Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, Yoshitake I, Kasamaki Y, Hirayama A, Minami K (2010) Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(6):1494–1500. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.039
Sheng J, Meng H, Fox RO (2000) A large eddy PIV method for turbulence dissipation rate estimation. Chem Eng Sci 55(20):4423–4434. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00039-7
Simon HA, Leo HL, Carberry J, Yoganathan AP (2004) Comparison of the hinge flow fields of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves under aortic and mitral conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 32(12):1607–1617
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2
Vukićević M, Fortini S, Querzoli G, Espa S, Pedrizzetti G (2012) Experimental study of an asymmetric heart valve prototype. Eur J Mech B Fluids 35:54–60. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2012.01.014
Wang Q, Sun W (2013) Finite element modeling of mitral valve dynamic deformation using patient-specific multi-slices computed tomography scans. Ann Biomed Eng 41(1):142–153. doi:10.1007/s10439-012-0620-6
Westaby S, Van Nooten G, Sharif H, Pillai R, Caes F (1996) Valve replacement with the ATS open pivot bileaflet prosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10(8):660–665
Yen JH, Chen SF, Chern MK, Lu PC (2014) The effect of turbulent viscous shear stress on red blood cell hemolysis. J Artif Organs 17(2):178–185. doi:10.1007/s10047-014-0755-3
Yin W, Alemu Y, Affeld K, Jesty J, Bluestein D (2004) Flow-induced platelet activation in bileaflet and monoleaflet mechanical heart valves. Ann Biomed Eng 32(8):1058–1066
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of a grant from Biomedical Engineering Programme, Agency of Science, Technology and Research Singapore for this study. The authors thank Dr. Boyang Su and Dr. Foad Kabinejadian for their contribution and advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, S.GD., Kim, S. & Leo, H.L. A biomimetic bi-leaflet mitral prosthesis with enhanced physiological left ventricular swirl restorative capability. Exp Fluids 57, 110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2195-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2195-8