Skip to main content
Log in

Aerodynamic drag control by pulsed jets on simplified car geometry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aerodynamic drag control by pulsed jets is tested in a wind tunnel around a simplified car geometry named Ahmed body with a rear slant angle of 35°. Pulsed jet actuators are located 5 × 10−3 m from the top of the rear window. These actuators are produced by a pressure difference ranging from 1.5 to 6.5 × 105 Pa. Their excitation frequency can vary between 10 and 550 Hz. The analysis of the control effects is based on wall visualizations, aerodynamic drag coefficient measurements, and the velocity fields obtained by 2D PIV measurements. The maximum drag reduction is 20 % and is obtained for the excitation frequency F j  = 500 Hz and for the pressure difference ∆P = 1.5 × 105 Pa. This result is linked with a substantial reduction in the transverse development of the longitudinal vortex structures coming from the left and right lateral sides of the rear window, with a displacement of the vortex centers downstream and with a decrease in the transverse rotational absolute values of these structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovich GN (1960) Teoriia turbulentnykh strui. Moscow

  • Ahmed SR, Ramm R, Faltin G (1984) Some salient features of the time averaged ground vehicle wake, SAE technical Paper Series 840300

  • Aubrun S, MacNally J, Alvi F, Kourta A (2011) Separation flow control on a generic ground vehicle using steady microjet arrays. Exp Fluids. doi:10.1007/s00348-011-1132-0

  • Beaudoin JF, Aider JL (2008) Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff body using flaps. Exp in Fluids 44(4):491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin JF, Cadot O, Aider JL, Gosse K, Paranthoën P, Hamelin B (2004) Cavitation as a complementary tool for automotive aerodynamics. Exp Fluids 37:763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bideaux E, Bobillier P, Fournier E, Gilliéron P, El Hajem M, Champagne JY, Gilotte P, Kourta A (2011) Aerodynamics for land vehicles; flow control; drag reduction with pulsed jets on thick body and massive flow separation, IJAD, 2010. Indersciences Enterprises Ltd, pp 282–298

  • Bruneau CH, Creusé E, Depeyras D, Gilliéron P, Mortazavi I (2011) An analytical approach to improve drag control techniques for the Ahmed body. In: Proceedings of Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, Paper no. AJK2011-23032, vol 1, pp 1025–1031

  • Gilliéron P, Chometon F (1999) Modelling of stationary three-dimensional detached airflows around an Ahmed Reference Body, Third International Workshop on Vortex, ESAIM, Proceedings, Vol 7. pp 173–182. http://www.emath.fr/proc/Vol7/

  • Gilliéron P, Kourta A (2010) Aerodynamic drag reduction by vertical splitter plates. Exp in Fluids 48(1):1–16. doi:10.1007/s00348-009-0705-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliéron P, Kourta A (2011) Automotive aerodynamics for environment, design and security. pp 49–60, Editions CEPADUES, ISBN 978.2.85428.969.5

  • Joseph P, Amandolèse X, Aider JL (2012) Drag reduction on the 25° slant angle Ahmed reference body using pulsed jet. Exp Fluids 52:1169–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanser WR, Ross JC, Kaufman AE (1991) Aerodynamic performance of a drag reduction device on a full-scale tractor/trailer, Vehicle Aerodynamics, PT-49, SAE paper no 912125

  • Leclerc C, Levallois E, Gilliéron P, Kourta A, Gallas Q (2006) Phase locked analysis of a simplified car geometry wake flow control using synthetic jet, ASME joint U.S.—European fluids engineering summer meeting, paper no FEDSM2006-98469, July, Miami, Florida

  • Pastoor M, Henning L, Noack BR, King R, Tadmor G (2008) Feedback shear layer control for bluff body drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 608:161–196

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pernod P, Preobrazhensky, Merlen A, Ducloux O, Talbi A, Gimeno L, Tiercelin N (2009) MEMS Magneto-Mechanicalmicrovalves (MMMS) for aerodynamic flow control. J Magn Magn Mater. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.04.086

  • Pujal G, Depardon S, Cossu C (2010) Drag reduction of a 3D bluff body using coherent streamwise streaks. Exp Fluids 49:1085–1094. doi:10.1007/s00348-010-0857-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouméas M (2006) Contribution à l’analyse et au contrôle du sillage épais par aspiration ou soufflage continu, PHD Thesis. Thèse de Doctorat, INP Toulouse

  • Rouméas M, Gilliéron P, Kourta A (2008) Separated flows around the rear window of a simplified car geometry. J Fluid Eng 130:021101–1021101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Philippe Gilotte (Plastic Omnium) and INSA Lyon for providing them with the Ahmed body model and the actuators. They also wish to thank Elisabeth Fournier, Pierre Bobillier, and Stéphane Loyer for their help in setting up the experimental protocol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azeddine Kourta.

Additional information

This article is part of the collection Topics in Flow Control. Guest Editors J. P. Bonnet and L. Cattafesta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilliéron, P., Kourta, A. Aerodynamic drag control by pulsed jets on simplified car geometry. Exp Fluids 54, 1457 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1457-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1457-y

Keywords

Navigation