Skip to main content
Log in

Strain ratio measurement of femoral cartilage by real-time elastosonography: preliminary results

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate strain ratio measurement of femoral cartilage using real-time elastosonography.

Methods

Twenty-five patients with femoral cartilage pathology on MRI (study group) were prospectively compared with 25 subjects with normal findings on MRI (control group) using real-time elastosonography. Strain ratio measurements of pathologic and normal cartilage were performed and compared, both within the study group and between the two groups.

Results

Elastosonography colour-scale coding showed a colour change from blue to red in pathologic cartilage and only blue colour-coding in normal cartilage. In the study group, the median strain ratio was higher in pathologic cartilage areas compared to normal areas (median, 1.49 [interquartile range, 0.80–2.53] vs. median, 0.01 [interquartile range, 0.01–0.01], p < 0.001, respectively). The median strain ratio of the control group was 0.01 (interquartile range, 0.01–0.01), and there was no significant difference compared to normal areas of the study group. There was, however, a significant difference between the control group cartilage and pathologic cartilage of the study group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Elastosonography may be an effective, easily accessible, and relatively simple tool to demonstrate pathologic cartilage and to differentiate it from normal cartilage in the absence of advanced imaging facility such as MRI.

Key Points

Elastosonography uses colour-maps and strain ratios for evaluating tissue deformability.

Colour change from blue to red and increased strain ratio represent softening.

Normal cartilage shows decreased compressibility, represented by blue colour and low strain ratio.

Pathologic cartilage shows increased compressibility, represented by red colour and high strain ratio.

Elastosonography may be used for differentiating pathologic cartilage from normal cartilage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

dGEMRIC:

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

FOV:

Field of view

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PACS:

Picture archiving and communication system

PDW:

Proton density-weighted

ROI:

Region of interest

RTE:

Real-time elastosonography

US:

Ultrasonography

References

  1. Goyal N, Gupta M (2012) Computerized morphometric analysis of human femoral articular cartilage. ISRN Rheumatol 2012:360201

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee CL, Huang MH, Chai CY, Chen CH, Su JY, Tien YC (2008) The validity of in vivo ultrasonographic grading of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage: a comparison with in vitro ultrasonographic and histologic gradings. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:352–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moller I, Bong D, Naredo E et al (2008) Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(Suppl 3):S4–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon CH, Kim HS, Ju JH, Jee WH, Park SH, Kim HY (2008) Validity of the sonographic longitudinal sagittal image for assessment of the cartilage thickness in the knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 27:1507–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Castriota-Scanderbeg A, De Micheli V, Scarale MG, Bonetti MG, Cammisa M (1996) Precision of sonographic measurement of articular cartilage: inter- and intraobserver analysis. Skelet Radiol 25:545–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathiesen O, Konradsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Jorgensen U (2004) Ultrasonography and articular cartilage defects in the knee: an in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of cartilage thickness and defect size assessment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:440–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kara M, Tiftik T, Oken O, Akkaya N, Tunc H, Ozcakar L (2013) Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 45:145–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frey H (2003) Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe 43:850–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13:111–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C et al (2009) Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:180–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS (2009) Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W134–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan S, Kudas S, Ozcan AS et al (2012) Real-time sonoelastography of the Achilles tendon: pattern description in healthy subjects and patients with surgically repaired complete ruptures. Skelet Radiol 41:1067–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho N, Jang M, Lyou CY, Park JS, Choi HY, Moon WK (2012) Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color Doppler US—influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 262:80–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matzat SJ, van Tiel J, Gold GE, Oei EH (2013) Quantitative MRI techniques of cartilage composition. Quant Imaging Med Surg 3:162–174

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newbould RD, Miller SR, Upadhyay N et al (2013) T1-weighted sodium MRI of the articulator cartilage in osteoarthritis: a cross sectional and longitudinal study. PLoS One 8:e73067

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park GY, Kwon DR (2011) Application of real-time sonoelastography in musculoskeletal diseases related to physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90:875–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan S, Ozcan MF, Tezcan F et al (2013) Real-time elastography for distinguishing angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: preliminary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:W369–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K (2008) Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:604–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R et al (2005) Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology 237:202–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tunc H, Oken O, Kara M et al (2012) Ultrasonographic measurement of the femoral cartilage thickness in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 35:203–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaya A, Kara M, Tiftik T et al (2013) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 33:899–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tatar IG, Kurt A, Yilmaz KB, Akinci M, Kulacoglu H, Hekimoglu B (2013) The learning curve of real time elastosonography: a preliminary study conducted for the assessment of malignancy risk in thyroid nodules. Med Ultrason 15:278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Halil Arslan. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Dr. Serkan Cay (Yuksek Ihtisas Heart Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey) kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study. Methodology: prospective case-control study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurdan Cay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cay, N., Ipek, A., Isik, C. et al. Strain ratio measurement of femoral cartilage by real-time elastosonography: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 25, 987–993 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3497-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3497-y

Keywords

Navigation