Skip to main content
Log in

Proton Motive Force in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Under Anaerobic Conditions in the Dark

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to examine the mediatory role of proton motive force (∆p) or proton ATPase in H2 production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides, ∆p was determined under anaerobic conditions in the dark, and the ATPase activity has been studied in R. sphaeroides strain A-10, isolated from Arzni mineral springs in Armenia. Membrane potential (∆φ) was measured from the distribution of tetraphenylphosphonium cation; pH gradient (∆pH) was the difference between the external and cytoplasmic pH values, and the latter was measured by 9-aminoacridine (9-AA) fluorescence changes. At pH 7.5, ∆φ was of −94 mV and the reversed ∆pH was +30 mV, resulting in ∆p of −64 mV. The addition of N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD), the F0F1–ATPase inhibitor, was not affect ∆φ. It was shown that ∆φ varies nearly linearly with ΔpH, ∆φ increased from −57.1 mV at pH 6.0 to −103.8 mV at pH 8.0; it was compensated at high external pH by a reversed ∆pH, resulting in a low ∆p under anaerobic-dark conditions. Intracellular ATP concentrations and energetic charge (EC) were measured to evaluate a metabolism activity of R. sphaeroides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson DE (1971) Adenine nucleotides as stoichiometric coupling agents in metabolism and as regulatory modifiers: the adenylate energy charge. In: Vogel HJ (ed) Metabolic regulation. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bagramyan K, Mnatsakanyan N, Poladyan A et al (2002) The roles of hydrogenases 3 and 4, and the F0F1-ATPase, in H2 production by Escherichia coli at alkaline and acidic pH. FEBS Lett 516:172–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blair DF (2003) Flagellar movement driven by proton translocation. FEBS Lett 545:86–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer PD (1988) Bioenergetic coupling to protonmotive force: should we be considering hydronium ion coordination and not group protonation? Trends Biochem Sci 13(1):5–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feniouk BA, Suzuki T, Yoshida M (2007) Regulatory interplay between proton motive force, ADP, phosphate, and subunit β in bacterial ATP synthase. J Biol Chem 282:764–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabrielyan L, Mnatsakanyan N, Trchounian A (2006) Molecular hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides: phenomenon, redox potential and proton-coupled processes. Biochim Biophys Acta 14:269–270

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gabrielyan L, Trchounian A (2009) Relationship between molecular hydrogen production, proton transport and the F0F1-ATPase activity in Rhodobacter sphaeroides strains from mineral springs. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2567–2572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grinus LL, Daugelavichus RJ, Alkmavichus GA (1980) Study of the membrane potential of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli cells by the penetration ion method. Biokhimiia 45:1609–1618 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hellingwerf KJ, Konings WN (1981) Proton motive force and secondary transport. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 47:579–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones OTG (1997) In: Haddock BA, Hamilton WA (eds) Microbial Energetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 151–183

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kapdan IK, Kargi F (2006) Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. J Enzyme Microb Technol 38:569–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kars G, Gündüz U, Yücel M et al (2009) Evaluation of hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001 and its hupSL deficient mutant using acetate and malate as carbon sources. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:2184–2190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khatipov E, Miyake M, Miyake J et al (1998) Accumulation of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate by Rhodobacter sphaeroides on various carbon and nitrogen substrates. FEMS Microbiol Lett 162:39–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim MS, Baek JS, Lee JK (2006) Comparison of H2 accumulation by Rhodobacter sphaeroides KD131 and its uptake hydrogenase and PHB synthase deficient mutant. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31:121–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi H, Suzuki T, Kinoshita N et al (1984) Amplification of the Streptococcus faecalis proton-translocating ATPase by a decrease in cytoplasmic pH. J Bacteriol 158:1157–1160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lakin GF (1992) Biometry. Vishaya shcola, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levin DB, Pitt L, Love M (2004) Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:173–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL et al (1953) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michels AM, Konings WN (1978) The electrochemical proton gradient generated by light in membrane vesicles and chromatophores from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Eur J Biochem 85:147–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ooshima H, Takakuwa S, Katsuda T et al (1998) Production of hydrogen by a hydrogenase-deficient mutant of Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Ferment Bioengin 85:470–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ormerod JG, Ormerod KS, Gest H (1961) Light-dependent utilization of organic compounds and photoproduction of molecular hydrogen by photosynthetic bacteria, relationship with nitrogen metabolism. Arch Biochem Biophys 94:449–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paronyan AKh (2003) Ecology, biological peculiarities of phototrophic bacteria of Armenia and perspectives of their application. DSc thesis. Abovyan, Armenia (in Russian)

  23. Puchkov EO, Bulatov IS, Zimchenko VP (1983) Investigation of intracellular pH in Escherichia coli by 9-aminoacridine fluorescence measurements. FEMS Microbiol Lett 20:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reith JH, Wijffels RH, Barten H (2003) Bio-methane & Bio-hydrogen: Status and perspectives of biological methane and hydrogen production. Novem, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  25. Setty OH, Hendler RW, Shrager RI (1983) Simultaneous measurements of proton motive force, delta pH, membrane potential, and H+/O ratios in intact Escherichia coli. Biophys J 43:371–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taussky HH, Shorr E (1953) A microcolorimetric method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus. J Biol Chem 202:675–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trchounian AA, Vassilian AV (1994) Relationship between the F0F1-ATPase and K+transport system within the membrane the anaerobically growth Escherichia coli. N, N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide-sensitive ATPase activity in mutants with defects in K+-transport. J Bioenerg Biomembr 26:563–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zakharova NB, Rubin VI (1980) Thin layer chromatography of erythrocyte nucleotides on Silufol plates. Lab Delo 12:735–738 (in Russian)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thank Prof. P. Kazaryan (Eolyan Hematology Center, Yerevan) for his help in ANP determination and valuable comments. This study was supported by the Armenian National Science and Education Fund, USA (ANSEF NS-Biotechnology-1668) and by the Research Grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia (#1012-2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armen Trchounian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakobyan, L., Gabrielyan, L. & Trchounian, A. Proton Motive Force in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Under Anaerobic Conditions in the Dark. Curr Microbiol 62, 415–419 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9723-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9723-1

Keywords

Navigation