Skip to main content
Log in

Level of conus medullaris termination in adult population analyzed by kinetic magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the change of conus medullaris termination (CMT) level in neutral, flexion and extension positions and to analyze the effects of age and gender on the CMT level.

Methods

The midline sagittal T2-weighted kinetic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI) study of 585 patients was retrospectively reviewed to identify the level of CMT. All patients were in an upright position. A straight line perpendicular to the long axis of the cord was drawn from the tip of the cord and then subtended to the adjacent vertebra or disk space. The CMT level was labeled in relation to the upper, middle and lower segments of adjacent vertebra or disk space and assigned values from 0 to 12 [0 = upper third of T12 (T12U), and 12 = upper third of L3 (L3U)]. All parameters were collected for neutral, flexion and extension positions.

Results

The level of CMT had the highest incidence (17.61%) at L1 lower (L1L) in neutral position, 17.44% at L1 upper (L1U) in flexion, and 16.92% at L1 middle (L1M) in extension with no significant differences among three positions (p > 0.05) in weight-bearing status. Moreover, the level of CMT was not correlated with age (p > 0.05). In terms of gender, the level of CMT was lower in women than in men in neutral position, flexion, and extension (p < 0.05). Furthermore, when divided by age in decades, there was a significant difference between females and males in the age group 60–69 years in neutral, flexion and extension position, respectively (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The level of CMT in the neutral position was in accordance with previous cadaveric and supine-position MRI studies, and it did not change with flexion and extension. Women had lower CMT level than men, especially in the older population. This information can be very valuable when performing spinal anesthesia and spinal punctures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ba Z, Zhao W, Wu D, Huang Y, Kan H (2012) MRI Study of the position of the conus medullaris in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthopedics 35:E899–E902. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120525-31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer DF, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Oakes WJ, Tubbs RS (2008) Study of the effects of flexion on the position of the conus medullaris. Child Nerv Syst 24:1043–1045. doi:10.1007/s00381-008-0640-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen SL, Huang YH, Wei TY, Huang KM, Ho SH, Bih LI (2012) Motor and bladder dysfunctions in patients with vertebral fractures at the thoracolumbar junction. Eur Spine J 21:844–849. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2062-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demiryurek D, Aydingoz U, Aksit MD, Yener N, Geyik PO (2002) MR imaging determination of the normal level of conus medullaris. Clin Imag 26:375–377. doi:10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00451-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Do DH, Taghavi CE, Fong W, Kong MH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2011) The relationship between degree of facet tropism and amount of dynamic disc bulge in lumbar spine of patients symptomatic for low back pain. Eur Spine J 20:71–78. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1558-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fettes PD, Leslie K, McNabb S, Smith PJ (2006) Effect of spinal flexion on the conus medullaris: a case series using magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesthesia 61:521–523. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04641.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gatonga P, Ogeng’o JA, Awori KO (2010) Spinal cord termination in adult africans: relationship with intercristal line and the transumbilical plane. Clin Anat 23:563–565. doi:10.1002/ca.20963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hauck EF, Wittkowski W, Bothe HW (2008) Intradural microanatomy of the nerve roots S1–S5 at their origin from the conus medullaris. J Neurosurg Spine 9:207–212. doi:10.3171/SPI/2008/9/8/207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JT, Bahk JH, Sung J (2003) Influence of age and sex on the position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier’s line in adults. Anesthesiology 99:1359–1363. doi:10.1097/00000542-200312000-00018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lao L, Daubs MD, Scott TP, Lord EL, Cohen JR, Yin R, Zhong G, Wang JC (2015) Effect of disc degeneration on lumbar segmental mobility analyzed by kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 40:316–322. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lao L, Daubs MD, Takahashi S, Lord EL, Cohen JR, Zhong G, Wang JC (2016) Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation. Eur Spine J 25:222–229. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3977-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu A, Zhang W, Sun M, Ma C, Yan S (2016) Evidence-based status of pulsed radiofrequency treatment for patients with shoulder pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain Pract 16:518–525. doi:10.1111/papr.12310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Needles JH (1935) The caudal level of termination of the spinal cord in American whites and American Negroes. Anat Rec 63:417–424. doi:10.1002/ar.1090630409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neer RM, SWAN Investigators (2010) Bone loss across the menopausal transition. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1192:66–71. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05233.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahmani M, Vaziri Bozorg SM, Ghasemi Esfe AR, Morteza A, Khalilzadeh O, Pedarzadeh E, Shakiba M (2011) Evaluating the reliability of anatomic landmarks in safe lumbar puncture using magnetic resonance imaging: does sex matter? Int J Biomed Imaging 2011:868632. doi:10.1155/2011/868632

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ranger MR, Irwin GJ, Bunbury KM, Peutrell JM (2008) Changing body position alters the location of the spinal cord within the vertebral canal: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Brit J Anaesth 101:804–809. doi:10.1093/bja/aen295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reimann AF, Anson BJ (1944) Vertebral level of termination of the spinal cord with report of a case of sacral cord. Anat Rec 88:127–138. doi:10.1002/ar.1090880108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reynolds F (2001) Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 56:238–247. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01422-2.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Romanes G (1981) Cunningham’s textbook of anatomy, 12th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 624.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saifuddin A, Burnett SJ, White J (1998) The variation of position of the conus medullaris in an adult population—a magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 23:1452–1456. doi:10.1097/00007632-199807010-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skrzypiec D, Tarala M, Pollintine P, Dolan P, Adams MA (2007) When are intervertebral discs stronger than their adjacent vertebrae? Spine 32:2455–2461. doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181573b87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soleiman J, Demaerel P, Rocher S, Maes F, Marchal G (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging study of the level of termination of the conus medullaris and the thecal sac: influence of age and gender. Spine 30:1875–1880. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000174116.74775.2e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomson A (1894) Fifth annual report of the committee of collective investigation of the anatomical society of Great Britain and Ireland for the year 1893–94. J Anat Physiol 29:35–60

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams A (2005) Gray’s Anatomy, 39th edn. Elsevier, Edinburgh, pp 775–787.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Witkamp TD, Vandertop WP, Beek FJ, Notermans NC, Gooskens RH, van Waes PF (2001) Medullary cone movement in subjects with a normal spinal cord and in patients with a tethered spinal cord. Radiology 220:208–212. doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl06208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by departmental funds. Authors would like to thank AiM Radiology Medical Group, especially to Yusuf A. Khan, Sameer U. Khan and Aziza Qadir MD for their help on obtaining and uploading kMRI images in the database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zorica Buser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None for the current study. Financial disclosures outside of submitted work: Buser Z—Consulting: Xenco Medical, AO Spine; Wang JC—Royalties: Aesculap, Biomet, Amedica, Seaspine, Synthes; Stock Ownership: Fziomed; Private Investments: Promethean Spine, Paradigm spine, Benevenue, NexGen, Vertiflex, electrocore, surgitech, corespine, expanding orthopaedics, osprey, bone biologics, curative biosciences, pearldiver; Board of Directors: North American Spine Society (non-financial, reimbursement for travel for board meetings, courses, etc.), North American Spine Foundation (non-financial), Cervical Spine Research Society (non-financial, reimbursement for travel for board meetings), AO Spine/AO Foundation (honorariums for board position); Fellowship Support: AO Foundation (spine fellowship funding paid to institution).

Additional information

A. Liu and K. Yang contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, A., Yang, K., Wang, D. et al. Level of conus medullaris termination in adult population analyzed by kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 39, 759–765 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1813-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1813-3

Keywords

Navigation