Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic versus Open Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with superior oncological outcome in comparison with percutaneous RFA. The present study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the relative perioperative safety and postoperative outcome of the laparoscopic or thoracoscopic approach versus the open approach to RFA for small HCC.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in 55 consecutive patients who underwent open (n = 32) or laparoscopic/thoracoscopic (LTS) RFA (n = 23) for primary unresectable HCC between January 2005 and December 2010. Baseline characteristics, survival/recurrence rates, and complications after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was a trend showing that LTS RFA was performed for tumors located in the anterior segment (e.g., segments III, V, VIII). The LTS RFA group had a significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter postoperative hospital stay, compared with the open RFA group. No major postoperative complications occurred in patients who underwent LTS RFA. No significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival and local recurrence rates were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

In consideration of operative invasiveness and postoperative recovery, LTS RFA is superior to the open approach in patients with small HCC. Moreover, the surgical outcome did not differ between the two approaches. Laparoscopic/thorascopic RFA can be considered to be a useful procedure for ablation therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H et al (2005) Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 242:252–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fan ST, Ng IO, Poon RT et al (1999) Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: the surgeon’s role in long-term survival. Arch Surg 134:1124–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O et al (2002) Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 131:311–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Livraghi T, Giorgio A, Marin G et al (1995) Hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis in 746 patients: long-term results of percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 197:101–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation improves prognosis compared with ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤4 cm. Gastroenterology 127:1714–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S et al (2005) A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 129:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aramaki M, Kawano K, Ohno T et al (2004) Microwave coagulation therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1784–1787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Teratani T, Yoshida H, Shiina S et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in so-called high-risk locations. Hepatology 43:1101–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang JW, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Croome KP et al (2011) Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations. World J Gastroenterol 17:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K et al (2003) Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer 97:1253–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hori T, Nagata K, Hasuike S et al (2003) Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Gastroenterol 38:977–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueno S, Sakoda M, Kubo F et al (2009) Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yokoyama T, Egami K, Miyamoto M et al (2003) Percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches of radiofrequency ablation treatment for liver cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10:425–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ballem N, Berber E, Pitt T et al (2008) Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term follow-up. HPB 10:315–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cassera MA, Potter KW, Ujiki MB et al (2011) Computed tomography (CT)-guided versus laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a single-institution comparison of morbidity rates and hospital costs. Surg Endosc 25:1088–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Minami Y, Kudo M (2010) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status. World J Radiol 2:417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Izumi N (2011) Recent advances of radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Machi J, Uchida S, Sumida K et al (2001) Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors: percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open surgical approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 5:477–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Topal B, Hompes D, Aerts R et al (2007) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic vs. open radiofrequency ablation for hepatic malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:603–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka S, Shimada M, Shirabe K et al (2009) Surgical radiofrequency ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an endoscopic or open approach. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1169–1173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YS, Lee WJ, Rhim H et al (2010) The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (>2 and <5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. Am J Roentgenol 195:758–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Ohmori S et al (2002) Radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment response based on tumor size and morphology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1225–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Takaki H et al (2008) Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization versus hepatectomy. Radiology 247:260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong SN, Lin CJ, Lin CC et al (2008) Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations. Am J Roentgenol 190:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang YJ, Liang HH, Chen MS et al (2007) Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation with or without ethanol injection: a prospective randomized trial. Radiology 244:599–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan

    Masahiko Sakoda, Shinichi Ueno, Satoshi Iino, Koji Minami, Kei Ando, Yota Kawasaki, Hiroshi Kurahara, Yukou Mataki, Kousei Maemura, Hiroyuki Shinchi & Shoji Natsugoe

Authors
  1. Masahiko Sakoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shinichi Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Satoshi Iino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Koji Minami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kei Ando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yota Kawasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hiroshi Kurahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yukou Mataki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kousei Maemura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hiroyuki Shinchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shoji Natsugoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiko Sakoda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakoda, M., Ueno, S., Iino, S. et al. Endoscopic versus Open Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J Surg 37, 597–601 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1868-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1868-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation