Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mining-Related Sediment and Soil Contamination in a Large Superfund Site: Characterization, Habitat Implications, and Remediation

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historical mining activity (1850–1970) in the now inactive Tri-State Mining District provided an ongoing source of lead and zinc to the environment including the US Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site located in Cherokee County, southeast Kansas, USA. The resultant contamination adversely affected biota and caused human health problems and risks. Remediation in the Superfund site requires an understanding of the magnitude and extent of contamination. To provide some of the required information, a series of sediment and soil investigations were conducted in and near the Superfund site to characterize lead and zinc contamination in the aquatic and floodplain environments along the main-stem Spring River and its major tributaries. In the Superfund site, the most pronounced lead and zinc contamination, with concentrations that far exceed sediment quality guidelines associated with potential adverse biological effects, was measured for streambed sediments and floodplain soils located within or downstream from the most intensive mining-affected areas. Tributary streambeds and floodplains in affected areas are heavily contaminated with some sites having lead and zinc concentrations that are an order of magnitude (or more) greater than the sediment quality guidelines. For the main-stem Spring River, the streambed is contaminated but the floodplain is mostly uncontaminated. Measured lead and zinc concentrations in streambed sediments, lakebed sediments, and floodplain soils documented a persistence of the post-mining contamination on a decadal timescale. These results provide a basis for the prioritization, development, and implementation of plans to remediate contamination in the affected aquatic and floodplain environments within the Superfund site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

sources: (Pope 2005; Juracek 2006, 2013; Juracek and Becker 2009)

Fig. 3

source: (Pope 2005)

Fig. 4

source: (Juracek 2006)

Fig. 5

source: (Juracek 2006)

Fig. 6

source: (Juracek and Becker 2009)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelo RT, Cringan MS, Chamberlain DL, Stahl AJ, Haslouer SG, Goodrich CA (2007) Residual effects of lead and zinc mining on freshwater mussels in the Spring River Basin (Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma, USA). Sci Total Environ 384:467–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arbogast BF (1996) Analytical methods manual for the Mineral Resource Surveys Program. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–525

  • Axtmann EV, Luoma SN (1991) Large-scale distribution of metal contamination in the fine-grained sediments of the Clark Fork River, Montana, USA. Appl Geochem 6:75–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baudo R, Giesy JP, Muntau H (1990) Sediments: chemistry and toxicity of in-place pollutants. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell FG, Donnelly LJ (2006) Mining and its impact on the environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, Brunson EL, Ingersoll CG (2005) Acute and chronic toxicity of lead in water and diet to the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1807–1815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Besser JM, Ingersoll CG, Brumbaugh WG, Kemble NE, May TW, Wang N, MacDonald DD, Roberts AD (2015) Toxicity of sediments from lead–zinc mining areas to juvenile freshwater mussels (Lampsilis siliquoidea) compared to standard test organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:626–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer WN, Dalgarn J, Dudding S, French JB, Mateo R, Miesner J, Sileo L, Spann J (2004) Zinc and lead poisoning in wild birds in the Tri-State mining district (Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri). Arch Environ Con Tox 48:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley SB (1989) Incorporation of metalliferous sediments from historic mining into river floodplains. GeoJournal 19(1):5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley SB, Cox JJ (1990) The significance of the floodplain to the cycling of metals in the River Derwent Catchment, UK. Sci Total Environ 97/98:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer PA, Taylor MP (1997) The spatial distribution of heavy metal contaminated sediment across terraced floodplains. Catena 30:229–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brichta LC (1960) Catalog of recorded exploration drilling and mine workings, Tri-State Zinc-Lead District, Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma. US Bureau of Mines Information Circular 7993

  • Briggs PH, Meier AL (1999) The determination of forty two elements in geological materials by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 99–166

  • Brosius L, Sawin RS (2001) Lead and zinc mining in Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Public Information Circular 17

  • Byrne P, Reid I, Wood PJ (2010) Sediment geochemistry of streams draining abandoned lead/zinc mines in central Wales: the Afon Twymyn. J Soils Sedim 10:683–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calmano W, Hong J, Forstner U (1993) Binding and mobilization of heavy metals in contaminated sediments affected by pH and redox potential. Water Sci Technol 28:223–235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JW, Andrews GA, Beyer WN (2004) Zinc toxicosis in a free-flying trumpeter swan (Cygnus buccinator). J Wildl Dis 40:769–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SA, O’Day PA, Piechowski M (1998) Rock-water interactions controlling zinc, cadmium, and lead concentrations in surface waters and sediments, US Tri-State Mining District. 2. Geochemical interpretation. Environ Sci Technol 32:956–965

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, Wang F, Janssen C, Persoone G, Allen HE (1998) Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2221–2243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies BE (1983) Heavy metal contamination from base metal mining and smelting—implications for man and his environment. In: Thornton I (ed) Applied environmental geochemistry. Academic, New York, pp 425–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis IA, Coulthard TJ, Brewer P, Macklin MG (2009) The role of floodplains in attenuating contaminated sediment fluxes in formerly mined drainage basins. Earth Surf Proc Land 34:453–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drake KD (1999) Leachability of size-fractionated mine tailings from the Kansas portion of the Tri-State Mining District. Masters thesis in Urban Environmental Geology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, 94 p

  • Drake KD (2010) Influence of grain size on leachability of mine tailings with social indicators assessment of a mining area population. Doctoral dissertation in Geosciences and Public Affairs and Administration, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, 162 p

  • Dsa JV, Johnson KS, Lopez D, Kanuckel C, Tumlinson J (2008) Residual toxicity of acid mine drainage-contaminated sediment to stream macroinvertebrates: relative contribution of acidity vs. metals. Water Air Soil Pollut 194:185–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Laing G, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Meers E, Tack FMG (2009) Trace metal behavior in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:3972–3985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Strategies Consulting, LLC (ESC) (2001) Final Design Report, Baxter Springs Subsite (OU-3), Cherokee County Superfund site, Baxter Springs, Kansas, prepared for Baxter Springs Subsite Respondents by ESC, Moon Township

  • Environmental Strategies Consulting, LLC (ESC) (2003) Remedial Action Report, Baxter Springs Subsite (OU-3), Cherokee County Superfund Site, Baxter Springs, Kansas, prepared for Baxter Springs Subsite Respondents by ESC, Moon Township

  • Fenneman NM (1938) Physiography of eastern United States. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 559–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman MJ, Friedman LC (eds) (1989) Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 5, Chap A1

  • Ford KL, Beyer WN (2014) Soil criteria to protect terrestrial wildlife and open-range livestock from metal toxicity at mining sites. Environ Monit Assess 186:1899–1905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • High Plains Regional Climate Center (2014) Historical data summaries. http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/. Cited 16 May 2014

  • Horowitz AJ (1991) A primer on sediment-trace element chemistry, 2nd edn. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz AJ, Stephens VC (2008) The effects of land use on fluvial sediment chemistry for the conterminous US—Results from the first cycle of the NAWQA program: trace and major elements, phosphorus, carbon, and sulfur. Sci Total Environ 400:290–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HydroGeoLogic, Incorporated (HGL) (2010) Phase 3 Remedial Design, Cherokee County Superfund Site, Baxter Springs and Treece Subsites, Operable Units 3 and 4, Cherokee County, Kansas, prepared for EPA Region 7 by HGL, Overland Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll CG, Ivey CD, Brumbaugh WG, Besser JM, Kemble NE (2009) Toxicity assessment of sediments from the Grand Lake O’ the Cherokees with the amphipod Hyalella azteca. US Geological Survey Administrative Report CERC-8335-FY09-20-01. http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/oklahoma/envqual.htm. Accessed 16 May 2014

  • Jin S, Yang L, Danielson P, Homer C, Fry J, Xian G (2013) A comprehensive change detection method for updating the national land cover database to circa 2011. Remote Sens Environ 132:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juracek KE (2006) Sedimentation and occurrence and trends of selected chemical constituents in bottom sediment, Empire Lake, Cherokee County, Kansas, 1905–2005. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5307

  • Juracek KE (2013) Occurrence and variability of mining-related lead and zinc in the Spring River flood plain and tributary flood plains, Cherokee County, Kansas, 2009–2011. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5028

  • Juracek KE, Becker MF (2009) Occurrence and trends of selected chemical constituents in bottom sediment, Grand Lake O’ the Cherokees, northeast Oklahoma, 1940–2008. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5258

  • Lecce SA, Pavlowsky RT (1997) Storage of mining-related zinc in floodplain sediments, Blue River, Wisconsin. Phys Geogr 18:424–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin J, Macklin MG (1987) Metal mining and floodplain sedimentation in Britain. In: Gardiner V (ed) International Geomorphology. Wiley, New York, pp 1009–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin J, Davies BE, Wolfenden PJ (1977) Interactions between channel change and historic mining sediments. In: Gregory KJ (ed) River channel changes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 353–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottermoser BG (2010) Mine wastes—characterization, treatment and environmental impacts, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoma SN, Rainbow PS (2008) Metal contamination in aquatic environments—science and lateral management. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Dickinson NM, Wong MH (2002) Toxicity of Pb/Zn mine tailings to the earthworm Pheretima and the effects of burrowing on metal availability. Biol Fertil Soils 36:79–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:20–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DD et al (2010) Advanced screening-level ecological risk assessment (SLERA) for aquatic habitats within the Tri-State Mining District, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri, prepared for EPA Regions 6 and 7, Dallas, Texas and Lenexa, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin MG (1996) Fluxes and storage of sediment-associated heavy metals in floodplain systems—Assessment and river basin management issues at a time of rapid environmental change. In: Anderson MG, Walling DE, Bates PD (eds) Floodplain processes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 441–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin MG, Ridgway J, Passmore DG, Rumsby BT (1994) The use of overbank sediment for geochemical mapping and contamination assessment—Results from selected English and Welsh floodplains. Appl Geochem 9:689–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin MG, Brewer PA, Hudson-Edwards KA, Bird G, Coulthard TJ, Dennis IA, Lechler PJ, Miller JR, Turner JN (2006) A geomorphological approach to the management of rivers contaminated by metal mining. Geomorphology 79:423–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcoe LH, Lynch RA, Kegler MC, Skaggs VJ (2002) Lead sources, behaviors, and socioeconomic factors in relation to blood lead of Native American and white children—a community-based assessment of a former mining area. Environ Health Persp 110(supplement 2):221–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merefield JR (1995) Sediment mineralogy and the environmental impact of mining. In: Foster I, Gurnell A, Webb B (eds) Sediment and water quality in river catchments. Wiley, New York, pp 145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (1997) The role of fluvial geomorphic processes in the dispersal of heavy metals from mine sites. J Geochem Explor 58:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JN, Brook EJ, Johns C (1989) Grain size partitioning of metals in contaminated, coarse-grained river floodplain sediment: Clark Fork River, Montana, USA. Environ Geol Water S 14:107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris GL, Fan J (1998) Reservoir sedimentation handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger JS, Mulhall M, Pomatto MC, Sheverbush J, Hassanein RS (1990) Health problems in Galena, Kansas—a heavy metal mining Superfund site. Sci Total Environ 94:261–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger JS, Hu SC, Drake KD, Jim R (2009) Potential health impacts of heavy metal exposure at the Tar Creek Superfund site, Ottawa County, Oklahoma. Environ Geochem Health 31:47–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peplow D, Edmonds R (2006) Cell pathology and developmental effects of mine waste contamination on invertebrates and fish in the Methow River, Okanogan County, Washington (USA). Mine Water Environ 25:190–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pope LM (2005) Assessment of contaminated streambed sediment in the Kansas part of the historic Tri-State lead and zinc mining district, Cherokee County, 2004. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5251

  • Ritchie JC, McHenry JR (1990) Application of radioactive fallout cesium-137 for measuring soil erosion and sediment accumulation rates and patterns—a review. J Environ Qual 19:215–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sample BE, Hansen JA, Dailey A, Duncan B (2011) Assessment of risks to ground-feeding songbirds from lead in the Coeur d’Alene Basin, Idaho, USA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:596–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaider LA, Senn DB, Brabander DJ, McCarthy KD, Shine JP (2007) Characterization of zinc, lead, and cadmium in mine waste: implications for transport, exposure, and bioavailability. Environ Sci Technol 41:4164–4171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaider LA, Senn DB, Estes ER, Brabander DJ, Shine JP (2014) Sources and fates of heavy metals in a mining-impacted stream—temporal variability and the role of iron oxides. Sci Total Environ 490:456–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CJ, Whyte JJ, Brumbaugh WG, Tillitt DE (2005) Biochemical effects of lead, zinc, and cadmium from mining on fish in the Tri-states district of northeastern Oklahoma, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1483–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seaber PR, Kapinos FP, Knapp GL (1987) Hydrologic unit maps. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294

    Google Scholar 

  • Sileo L, Beyer WN, Mateo R (2004) Pancreatitis in wild zinc-poisoned waterfowl. Avian Pathol 32:655–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruill TB (1987) Assessment of water resources in lead-zinc mined areas in Cherokee County, Kansas, and adjacent areas. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2268

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer ET (1972) Foundations of climatology—an introduction to physical, dynamic, synoptic, and geographical climatology. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of the Interior (2008) Cherokee County restoration plan/environmental assessment, prepared by Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA, for the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1987) Record of Decision, Operable Unit Remedial Alternative Selection, Cherokee County Site, Galena Subsite, Cherokee County, Kansas, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1989) Record of Decision, Cherokee County, Galena subsite, Ground Water/Surface Water Operable Unit, EPA Region 7 Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1996a) Record of Decision, Galena Residential Soils, Galena subsite, Operable Unit #7, Cherokee County Superfund Site, Cherokee County, Kansas, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1996b) Record of Decision, Residential Yard and Mine Waste Yard Soils, Operable Units 02 and 03, Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt Site, Jasper County, Missouri, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1997a) Record of Decision, Residential Areas, Operable Unit #2, Tar Creek Superfund site, Ottawa County, Oklahoma, EPA Region 6, Dallas

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1997b) Record of Decision, Baxter Springs and Treece subsites, Operable Units #03/04, Cherokee County Superfund site, Cherokee County, Kansas, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Record of Decision, Ground Water, Operable Unit 04, Oronogo/Duenweg Mining Belt Site, Jasper County, Missouri, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2004a) Record of Decision, Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt Site, Jasper County Superfund Site, Jasper County, Missouri, Mine and Mill Waste, Operable Unit 1, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2004b) Record of Decision, Badger, Lawton, Waco, and Crestline subsites, Operable Unit #6, Cherokee County Superfund site, Cherokee County, Kansas, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Record of Decision Amendment, Cherokee County Superfund site, Baxter Springs and Treece subsites, Operable Units #03 and #04, Cherokee County, Kansas, EPA Region 7, Kansas City

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Field portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for the determination of elemental concentrations in soil and sediment, method 6200. http://epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/6200.pdf. Accessed Jan 2010

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Record of Decision, Operable Unit #4, Chat Piles, Other Mine and Mill Waste, and Smelter Waste, Tar Creek Superfund Site, Ottawa County, Oklahoma, EPA Region 6, Dallas

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Five-year review report, fourth five-year review report for the Cherokee County Superfund Site, Cherokee County, Kansas, EPA Region 7, Lenexa

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2014a) National priority list sites in the Midwest. http://www.epa.gov/region7/cleanup/npl_files/index.htm. Cited 30 April 2014

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2014b) SWAT modeling update in the Tri-State Mining District, EPA Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Laboratory, Cincinnati

  • van der Merwe D, Carpenter JW, Nietfeld JC, Miesner JF (2011) Adverse health effects in Canada geese (Branta Canadensis) associated with waste from zinc and lead mines in the Tri-State Mining District (Kansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri, USA). J Wildl Dis 3:650–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Metre PC, Callender E, Fuller CC (1997) Historical trends in organochlorine compounds in river basins identified using sediment cores from reservoirs. Environ Sci Technol 31:2339–2344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE, Owens PN, Carter J, Leeks GJL, Lewis S, Meharg AA, Wright J (2003) Storage of sediment-associated nutrients and contaminants in river channel and floodplain systems. Appl Geochem 18:195–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Ingersoll CG, Ivey CD, Hardesty DK, May TW, Augspurger T, Roberts AD, Van Genderen E, Barnhart MC (2010) Sensitivity of early life stages of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) to acute and chronic toxicity of lead, cadmium, and zinc in water. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2053–2063

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wildhaber ML, Allert AL, Schmitt CJ, Tabor VM, Mulhern D, Powell KL, Sowa SP (2000) Natural and anthropogenic influences on the distribution of the threatened Neosho madtom in a midwestern warmwater stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:243–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise SM (1980) Caesium-137 and lead-210—a review of the techniques and some applications in geomorphology. In: Cullingford RA, Davidson DA, Lewin J (eds) Timescales in geomorphology. Wiley, New York, pp 109–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The sediment and soil contamination studies completed by the U.S. Geological Survey were made possible, in part, by financial support provided by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. E. Juracek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Juracek, K.E., Drake, K.D. Mining-Related Sediment and Soil Contamination in a Large Superfund Site: Characterization, Habitat Implications, and Remediation. Environmental Management 58, 721–740 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0729-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0729-8

Keywords

Navigation