Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bio-Revitalization: Effects of NASHA on Genes Involving Tissue Remodeling

  • Original Article
  • Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The “non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid” (NASHA) is a widely used product in bio-revitalization injective procedures in esthetic medicine. The present research aimed to quantitatively evaluate the therapeutic effect of one of the more used bio-revitalization products on cultured dermal fibroblasts. RT-PCR was used for gene expression profiling of some proteins known to be relevant in skin homeostasis.

Methods

Human dermal fibroblasts were seeded on a culture medium enriched with a product for dermal bio-revitalization, consisting of stabilized hyaluronic acid gel 20 mg/ml. After 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, the cDNA was amplified by real-time PCR. Gene expression was quantified with the delta/delta calculation method.

Results

In this study, the gene of metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 is strongly expressed after NASHA incubation. The MMP-2 encoding gene instead is less expressed, but both evidence the same temporal trend, being progressively up-regulated after 24 and 48 h, thereafter the expression decreases, whereas MMP-3 maintains the same up-regulation at 72 h. Hyaluronan synthase 1 and desmoplakin are progressively up-regulated and increase at 24, 48, and 72 h. Hyaluronidase 1 and neutrophil elastase genes are overexpressed, but at 72 h they both exhibit the same behavior as the other degradative enzymes MMP-13 and MMP-2.

Conclusions

Skin bio-revitalization by injecting the tested NASHA gel produces an enhancement in the expression of some genes involved in extracellular matrix degradation and organization. In this study, a time-dependent behavior, different for genes encoding degradative compared to synthesis proteins, was demonstrated.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sadick NS (2008) The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life. Dermatol Online J 14:2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Avantaggiato A, Palmieri A, Carinci F, Pasin M, Bertuzzi GL (2013) Biostimulation and biorevitalization: effects on human skin fibroblasts. Ann Oral Maxillofac Surg 1:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leighton R, Akermark C, Therrien R, Richardson JB, Andersson M, Todman MG, Arden NK, Group DS (2014) NASHA hyaluronic acid vs. methylprednisolone for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22:17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao SS (2014) Current and emerging treatment options for fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol 48:752–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mattioli G, Guida E, Rossi V, Podesta E, Jasonni V, Ghiggeri GM (2012) Intraureteral injection of NASHA/Dx gel under direct ureteroscopic visualization for the treatment of primary high-grade vesicoureteral reflux. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:844–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamada J, Kitayama J, Tsuno NH, Yamashita H, Miyato H, Soma D, Otani K, Kamei T, Ishigami H, Hidemura A, Kaisaki S, Takahashi K, Nagawa H (2008) Intra-peritoneal administration of paclitaxel with non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid as a vehicle–a new strategy against peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Cancer Lett 272:307–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton RG, Strobos J, Adkinson NF Jr (2007) Immunogenicity studies of cosmetically administered nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid particles. Dermatol Surg 33(Suppl 2):S176–S185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim HK, Suh DH, Lee SJ, Shin MK (2014) Rejuvenation effects of hyaluronic acid injection on nasojugal groove: prospective randomized split face clinical controlled study. J Cosmet Laser Ther 16:32–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Streker M, Reuther T, Krueger N, Kerscher M (2013) Stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin for skin rejuvenation: face, hand, and decolletage. J Drugs Dermatol 12:990–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerscher M, Bayrhammer J, Reuther T (2008) Rejuvenating influence of a stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of nonanimal origin on facial skin aging. Dermatol Surg 34:720–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reuther T, Bayrhammer J, Kerscher M (2010) Effects of a three-session skin rejuvenation treatment using stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin on skin elasticity: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol Res 302:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker AH, Edwards DR, Murphy G (2002) Metalloproteinase inhibitors: biological actions and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Sci 115:3719–3727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogura Y, Tajrishi MM, Sato S, Hindi SM, Kumar A (2014) Therapeutic potential of matrix metalloproteinases in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Front Cell Dev Biol 2:11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G (2006) Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res 69:562–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Lin Z, Foolen J, Schoen I, Santoro A, Zenobi-Wong M, Vogel V (2014) Disentangling the multifactorial contributions of fibronectin, collagen and cyclic strain on MMP expression and extracellular matrix remodeling by fibroblasts. Matrix Biol 40:62–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koster MI, Dinella J, Chen J, O’Shea C, Koch PJ (2014) Integrating animal models and in vitro tissue models to elucidate the role of desmosomal proteins in diseases. Cell Commun Adhes 21:55–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Jassar C, Bernadomicron P, Chidgey M, Overduin M (2013) Hinged plakin domains provide specialized degrees of articulation in envoplakin, periplakin and desmoplakin. PLoS One 8:e69767

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bigliardi PL, Neumann C, Teo YL, Pant A, Bigliardi-Qi M (2015) Activation of the delta-opioid receptor promotes cutaneous wound healing by affecting keratinocyte intercellular adhesion and migration. Br J Pharmacol 172:501–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Jassar C, Bikker H, Overduin M, Chidgey M (2013) Mechanistic basis of desmosome-targeted diseases. J Mol Biol 425:4006–4022

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chua F, Laurent GJ (2006) Neutrophil elastase: mediator of extracellular matrix destruction and accumulation. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3:424–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Korkmaz B, Horwitz MS, Jenne DE, Gauthier F (2010) Neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsin G as therapeutic targets in human diseases. Pharmacol Rev 62:726–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Avantaggiato A, Bertuzzi G, Vitiello U, Iannucci G, Pasin M, Pascali M, Cervelli V, Carinci F (2014) Role of antioxidants in dermal aging: an in vitro study by q-RT-PCR. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:1011–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Avantaggiato A, Girardi A, Palmieri A, Pascali M and Carinci F (2015) Comparison among bio-revitalizing injective products: a study on skin fibroblast cultures. Rejuvenation Res. doi:10.1089/rej.2014.1654

  25. Averbeck M, Gebhardt CA, Voigt S, Beilharz S, Anderegg U, Termeer CC, Sleeman JP, Simon JC (2007) Differential regulation of hyaluronan metabolism in the epidermal and dermal compartments of human skin by UVB irradiation. J Invest Dermatol 127:687–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The products used in the present study were bought independently by the authors and no founds were received from the company. The proprietary name, also known as brand name or trade name, was used for clarity and should not be viewed as an endorsement by the authors of a specific product.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Palmieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avantaggiato, A., Girardi, A., Palmieri, A. et al. Bio-Revitalization: Effects of NASHA on Genes Involving Tissue Remodeling. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 459–464 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0514-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0514-8

Keywords

Navigation