Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aesthetic Quality of the Nipple–Areola Complex in Breast Reconstruction with a New Local Graft Technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Reconstruction of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) is the last stage of breast reconstruction and represents the search for symmetry in regard to the contralateral breast. The objective of this study was to present an areola reconstruction technique with local skin graft to improve the texture and aspect of the reconstructed areola, searching for a natural look.

Methods

This technique was performed on 122 patients who in the period from January 2000 to December 2005 were submitted to nipple and areola reconstruction. Once the position of the new nipple was determined, markings were made for the reconstruction of the areola. Then the external limit of the new areola was incised and the skin was centripetally deepidermized up to 85% of its diameter. After this procedure the detached skin was repositioned in its bed as a graft and sutured with 4.0 mononylon thread. Incisions with an 11-blade scalpel were then made in V and C forms associated with the detachment of this skin of the receptor area along the local graft so that at the end of the healing process they would determine alterations in the areolar texture mimicking the texture of a normal areola. All patients underwent tattooing 3 months after reconstruction of the NAC taking into account the different shades of the contralateral areola and nipple colors.

Results

The use of a local skin graft associated with C and V incisions allowed alteration in the texture of the reconstructed areola. The use of different ink shades for tattooing helped to give a tridimensional aspect to this areola. These factors determined a good aesthetic result in these patients.

Conclusion

This areola reconstruction using a local skin graft allows change in the areola texture and a tridimensional aspect similar to that of a normal areola without the inconvenience of grafting from a distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brent B, Bostwick J (1977) Nipple–areolar reconstruction with auricular tissues. Plast Reconst Surg 60:353–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatty MA, Berry RB (1997) Nipple–areola reconstruction by tattooing and nipple sharing. Br J Plast Surg 50(5):331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang WH (1984) Nipple reconstruction with a T-flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:140–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen SG, Chiu TF, Su WF et al (2005) Nipple-areola complex reconstruction using badge flap and intradermal tattooing. Br J Surg 92:435–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cronin ED, Humphreys DH, Ruiz-Razura A (1988) Nipple reconstruction: the S flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:783–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eskenazi L (1993) A one-stage nipple reconstruction with the “modified star” flap and immediate tattoo: a review of 100 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:671–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eng JS (1996) Bell flap nipple reconstruction: a new wrinkle. Ann Plast Surg 6:485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM (2005) Nipple reconstruction: the top hat technique. Ann Plast Surg 54:243–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartrampf CR, Culbertson JH (1984) A dermal-fat flap for nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:982–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallock GG, Altobelli JA (1993) Cylindrical nipple reconstruction using an H flap. Ann Plast Surg 30:23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hugo NE, Sultan MR, Hardy SP (1993) Nipple-areola reconstruction with intradermal tattoo and double-opposing pennant flaps. Ann Plast Surg 30:510–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR, Karas T, Cohen BE (2002) Nipple–areolar reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kroll SS, Hamilton S (1989) Nipple reconstruction with double-opposing-tab flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:520–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ et al (1997) Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1602–1605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kroll SS (1999) Integrated breast mound reduction and nipple reconstruction with the wraparound flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:687–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kroll SS (1999) Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing tab flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:511–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Little JW III (1983) One-stage reconstruction of a projecting nipple: the quadripod flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:126–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J III (2001) Nipple reconstruction using the C–V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:361–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lossing C, Brongo S, Holmström H (1998) Nipple reconstruction with a modified S-flap technique. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32:275–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Puckett CL, Concannon MJ, Croll GH et al (1992) Nipple reconstruction using the “inchworm” flap. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16:117–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramakrishnan VV, Mohan D, Villafane O et al (1997) Twin flap technique for nipple reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 39:241–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J (2002) Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:780–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanabe HY, Tai Y, Kiyokawa K et al (1997) Nipple–areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:431–43824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW III (1987) The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:699–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL (2001) Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:46–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nahabedian, MY, Tsangaris TN (2006) Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1083–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Márcio Paulino Costa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, M.P., Ferreira, M.C. Aesthetic Quality of the Nipple–Areola Complex in Breast Reconstruction with a New Local Graft Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 33, 774–779 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9387-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9387-z

Keywords

Navigation