Abstract
Multiple mating is common in many socially monogamous birds and mammals, but why is still unclear. Fertility insurance is one the posited genetic benefits. However, this mechanism fails if females cannot detect male infertility before mating, and infertile sperm are equally capable of fertilizing eggs (e.g., fertilization occurs but is followed by early developmental arrest): multiple mating simply exchanges whole brood loss for partial brood loss with no difference in the overall proportion of failed offspring. However, I note here that these two options will rarely result in equivalent reproductive success: partial brood loss will generally result in more surviving offspring than whole brood loss vs. whole brood survival due to increasing per capita survival of offspring in smaller broods. A partial fertility strategy can yield benefits even in the extreme case where fertility is cryptic and defective sperm are capable of fertilizing eggs. Moreover, partial fertility will yield an added benefit to fertility insurance when the precedence of fertile over infertile sperm is incomplete.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akçay E, Roughgarden J (2007) Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evol Ecol Res 9:855–868
Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M (2005) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am Nat 165:S26–S37
Bloom SE (1972) Chromosome abnormalities in chicken (Gallus domesticus) embryos: types, frequencies and phenotypic effects. Chromosoma 37:309–326
Brommer JE, Korsten P, Bouwman KM, Berg ML, Komdeur J (2007) Is extrapair mating random? On the probability distribution of extrapair young in avian broods. Behav Ecol 18:895–904
Creasy MR, Crolla JA, Alberman ED (1976) A cytogenetic study of human spontaneous abortions using banding techniques. Hum Genet 31:177–196
Fechheimer NS (1981) Origins of heteroploidy in chick embryos. Poult Sci 60:1365–1371
Finn S, Civetta A (2010) Sexual selection and the molecular evolution of ADAM proteins. J Mol Evol 71:231–240
Forbes S (2009) Portfolio theory and how parent birds manage investment risk. Oikos 118:1561–1569
Forbes S (2010) Family structure and variation in reproductive success in blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:475–483
Forbes S (2011) Social rank governs the effective environment of siblings. Biol Lett 7:346–348
Forbes S, Wiebe M (2010) Egg size and asymmetric sibling rivalry in red-winged blackbirds. Oecologia 163:361–372
Forstmeier W, Ellegren H (2010) Trisomy and triploidy are sources of embryo mortality in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:2655–2660
Golubovsky MD (2002) Paternal familial twinning: hypothesis and genetic/medical implications. Twin Res 5:75–86
Golubovsky MD (2003) Postzygotic diploidization of triploids as a source of unusual cases of mosaicism, chimerism and twinning. Hum Reprod 18:236–242
Gray EM (1996) Female control of offspring paternity in a western population of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:267–278
Gray EM (1997) Do red-winged blackbirds benefit genetically from seeking extra-pair copulations? Anim Behav 53:605–623
Griffith SC (2007) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection. Am Nat 169:274–281
Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra-pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212
Hasson O, Stone L (2009) Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations. Biol Rev 84:225–244
Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64
Kisdi É (2003) Reinforcement with multiple mating. Trends Ecol Evol 18:165–166
Krist M, Munclinger P (2011) Superiority of extra-pair offspring: maternal but not genetic effects as revealed by a mixed cross-fostering design. Mol Ecol 20:5074–5091
Lifjeld JT, Laskemoen T, Fossøy F, Johnsen A, Kleven O (2007) Functional infertility among territorial males in two passerine species, the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus and the bluethroat Luscinia svecica. J Avian Biol 38:267–272
Roff DA (1992) Evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York
Sheldon BC (1993) Sexually transmitted disease in birds: occurrence and evolutionary significance. Phil Trans R Soc B 339:491–497
Sheldon BC (1994) Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:25–30
Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506
Snook RR, Hosken DJ, Karr TL (2011) The biology and evolution of polyspermy: insights from cellular and functional studies of sperm and centrosomal behavior in the fertilized egg. Reproduction 142:779–792
Stearns S (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD (2002) The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat Rev Genet 3:137–144
Vacquier VD (1998) Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science 281:1995–1998
Weatherhead PJ, Montgomerie R, Gibbs HL, Boag PT (1994) The cost of extra-pair fertilizations to female red-winged blackbirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:315–320
Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT (1995) Pair and extra-pair mating success relative to male quality in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:81–91
Westneat DF (1992) Do female red-winged blackbirds engage in a mixed mating strategy? Ethology 92:7–28
Westneat DF (1993) Polygyny and extrapair fertilizations in eastern red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol 4:49–60
Westneat DF, Rambo TB (2000) Copulation exposes female red-winged blackbirds to bacteria in male semen. J Avian Biol 31:1–7
Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:365–396
Yasui Y (1998) The ‘genetic benefits’ of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol Evol 13:246–250
Acknowledgments
This work would not have been possible without the assistance of a very large number of field assistants—too numerous to list here—over the years. I am grateful to them all. Funding for this work was provided by the University of Winnipeg and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. I thank Trish Schwagmeyer, Douglas Mock, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Rubenstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forbes, S. Partial fertility and polyandry: a benefit of multiple mating hiding in plain sight?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68, 1329–1334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1743-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1743-6