Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture using the clavicle reductor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to introduce a self-designed clavicle reductor and to test the effectivity of a alternative minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique (MIPO) for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCFs) with the application of our self-designed clavicle reductor.

Method

From October 2012 to February 2013, 27 male patients who suffered with unilateral displaced midshaft clavicular fracture (DMCFs) were included into our study. Patients were treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique with the application of our self-designed clavicle reductor and followed up regularly. Constant-Murley score was employed to test the functional outcomes at one year’s follow up.

Result

The average follow-up time for the 27 patients was 15.8 months (range, 13–18 months). The average age of all patients was 32.6 (range, 21 to 48). According to OTC system, 12 cases were simple fractures (15-B1), ten cases were wedge fractures (15-B2) and five cases were comminuted fractures (15-B3). With the application of the clavicle reductor, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique can be performed without any barrier in all of the 27 cases. Operative duration was 48.1 minutes (range, 35–65 minutes) and average fluoroscopy time was 12.8 seconds (range, from 7 to 22 seconds). All of the 27 cases healed from four to six months post-operatively. The average Constant-Murley-score of the 27 patients was 92.7 ± 5.88 (range, 80 to 100). No complications were noted.

Conclusion

The self-designed clavicle reductor can effectively pave the way for the application of MIPO technique in the treatment of DMCFs. MIPO technique with locking reconstruction plate is a feasible and worthwhile alternative for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCFs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van der Meijden OA, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ (2012) Treatment of clavicle fractures: current concepts review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(3):423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neer CS 2nd (1960) Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc 172:1006–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jorgensen A, Troelsen A, Ban I (2014) Predictors associated with nonunion and symptomatic malunion following non-operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures−a systematic review of the literature. Int Orthop 38:2543–2549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD (2005) Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the evidence-based orthopaedic trauma working group. J OrthopTrauma 19(7):504–507

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA (1997) Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79(4):537–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Y, Tian Y, Dong T et al (2015) Management of the mid-shaft clavicle fractures using plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation: an updated meta-analysis. Int Orthop 39:319–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Millett PJ, Hurst JM, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ (2011) Complications of clavicle fractures treated with intramedullary fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(1):86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strauss EJ, Egol KA, France MA, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (2007) Complications of intramedullary Hagie pin fixation for acute midshaft clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(3):280–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H (1997) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A20–A30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):452–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nordqvist A, Petersson C (1994) The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson CM (1998) Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(3):476–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Collinge C, Devinney S, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2006) Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma 20(10):680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen YF, Wei HF, Zhang C, Zeng BF, Zhang CQ, Xue JF, Xie XT, Lu Y (2012) Retrospective comparison of titanium elastic nail (TEN) and reconstruction plate repair of displaced midshaftclavicular fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(4):495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Apivatthakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S (2005) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury 36(4):530–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sohn HS, Shin SJ, Kim BY (2012) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using anterior-inferior plating of clavicularmidshaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(2):239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang H, Qu W (2012) Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures using a locking compression plate: comparison between mini-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique and conventional open reduction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(6):666–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Babst R, Hehli M, Regazzoni P (2001) LISS tractor. Combination of the “less invasive stabilization system” (LISS) with the AO distractor for distal femur and proximal tibial fractures. Unfallchirurg 104(6):530–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perren SM (2002) The technology of minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). Injury 33(Suppl 1):VI–VII

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krettek C, Muller M, Miclau T (2001) Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC14–SC23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingze Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

The studyhas approvedby the Ethical Board of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Shijiazhuang, China) after a thorough examination and verification.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Chen, W., Sun, J. et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture using the clavicle reductor. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1679–1683 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3392-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3392-z

Keywords

Navigation