Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential advantages of contemporary MoM THA implants include less volumetric wear with subsequent reduction of polyethylene wear-induced osteolysis and greater component stability with use of large-diameter femoral heads. However, there have been concerns regarding significantly elevated revision rates in MoM THA due to MoM-related complications such as adverse local tissue reaction (pseudotumour) formation. The increased failure rate in MoM hip arthroplasty is associated with the generation of biologically active, nanometer sized metal particles from the MoM bearing surfaces and taper junctions, which result in the development of a localized, adverse periprosthetic soft tissue response. The focus of this article is to provide an update on (1) implant, surgical and patient factors associated with adverse local tissue reactions (pseudotumours) and (2) the clinical systematic evaluation and management of patients with MoM hip arthroplasty based on the currently available evidence. There should be a low threshold to conduct a systematic clinical evaluation of patients with MoM hip arthroplasty as early recognition and diagnosis will allow the initiation of prompt and appropriate treatment. As a symptomatic MoM total hip arthroplasty may have intrinsic and extrinsic causes, patients should be evaluated systematically, utilizing risk stratification algorithms. Although specialized laboratory tests such as metal ion levels and cross sectional imaging modalities such as MARS MRI can be used to facilitate clinical decision making, over-reliance on any single investigative tool in the clinical decision-making process should be avoided. Further research is required to obtain a better understanding of implant and patient risk factors associated with tribocorrosion in MoM total hip arthroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J (1966) Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48(2):245–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnley J (1970) Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 72:7–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deutman R, Mulder TJ, Brian R, Nater JP (1977) Metal sensitivity before and after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(7):862–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Cleland D, Leung F (2003) Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:282–296. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000043066.62337.9d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedigrew KM, Ruh EL, Zhang Q, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL, Nunley RM (2012) 2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):299–306. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2131-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matharu GS, Pandit HG, Murray DW, Treacy RB (2015) The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 39(10):2031–2036. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2692-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Innmann MM, Gotterbarm T, Kretzer JP, Merle C, Ewerbeck V, Weiss S, Aldinger PR, Streit MR (2014) Minimum ten-year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger. Int Orthop 38(5):929–934. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2228-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corten K, MacDonald SJ (2010) Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):351–357. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolognesi MP, Ledford CK (2015) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: patient evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23(12):724–731. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(7):1614–1620. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vendittoli PA, Roy A, Mottard S, Girard J, Lusignan D, Lavigne M (2010) Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations: a follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):12–19. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ (2012) Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(18):1655–1661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper HJ, Urban RM, Wixson RL, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ (2013) Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(10):865–872. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):847–851. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP (2005) An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(1):18–27. doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.00949

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandit H, Vlychou M, Whitwell D, Crook D, Luqmani R, Ostlere S, Murray DW, Athanasou NA (2008) Necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours in bilateral resurfacing hip arthoplasties: evidence for a type IV immune response. Virchows Arch 453(5):529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zywiel MG, Cherian JJ, Banerjee S, Cheung AC, Wong F, Butany J, Gilbert C, Overgaard C, Syed K, Jacobs JJ, Mont MA (2016) Systemic cobalt toxicity from total hip arthroplasties: review of a rare condition Part 2—measurement, risk factors, and step-wise approach to treatment. Bone Joint J 98-B(1):14–20. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung AC, Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Wong F, Butany J, Gilbert C, Overgaard C, Syed K, Zywiel MG, Jacobs JJ, Mont MA (2016) Systemic cobalt toxicity from total hip arthroplasties: review of a rare condition Part 1 - history, mechanism, measurements, and pathophysiology. Bone Joint J 98-B(1):6–13. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antoniou J, Zukor DJ, Mwale F, Minarik W, Petit A, Huk OL (2008) Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):142–148. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Langton DJ, Sidaginamale R, Lord JK, Nargol AV, Joyce TJ (2012) Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings. Bone Joint Res 1(4):56–63. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.14.2000047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Balso C, Teeter MG, Tan SC, Howard JL, Lanting BA (2016) Trunnionosis: does head size affect fretting and corrosion in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.009

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bayley N, Khan H, Grosso P, Hupel T, Stevens D, Snider M, Schemitsch E, Kuzyk P (2015) What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):477–484. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3824-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hjorth MH, Stilling M, Soballe K, Bolvig LH, Thyssen JP, Mechlenburg I, Jakobsen SS (2015) No association between pseudotumors, high serum metal-ion levels and metal hypersensitivity in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 5-7-year follow-up. Skeletal Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00256-015-2264-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Triantafyllopoulos GK, Elpers ME, Burket JC, Esposito CI, Padgett DE, Wright TM (2016) Otto aufranc award: large heads do not increase damage at the head-neck taper of metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):330–338. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4468-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whitehouse MR, Endo M, Zachara S, Nielsen TO, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2015) Adverse local tissue reactions in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty due to trunnion corrosion: the risk of misdiagnosis. Bone Joint J 97-B(8):1024–1030. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobs JJ, Wimmer MA (2013) An important contribution to our understanding of the performance of the current generation of metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(8):e53. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavigne M, Belzile EL, Roy A, Morin F, Amzica T, Vendittoli PA (2011) Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels in four types of metal-on-metal large-diameter femoral head total hip arthroplasty: the potential influence of the adapter sleeve. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 2):128–136. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hutt J, Lavigne M, Lungu E, Belzile E, Morin F, Vendittoli PA (2016) Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels among four types of large-head, metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty implants: a concise follow-up, at five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(4):257–266. doi:10.2106/JBJS.O.00201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brock TM, Sidaginamale R, Rushton S, Nargol AV, Bowsher JG, Savisaar C, Joyce TJ, Deehan DJ, Lord JK, Langton DJ (2015) Shorter, rough trunnion surfaces are associated with higher taper wear rates than longer, smooth trunnion surfaces in a contemporary large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty system. J Orthop Res 33(12):1868–1874. doi:10.1002/jor.22970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kwon YM, Glyn-Jones S, Simpson DJ, Kamali A, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW (2010) Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):356–361. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matthies AK, Henckel J, Cro S, Suarez A, Noble PC, Skinner J, Hart AJ (2014) Predicting wear and blood metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Orthop Res 32(1):167–174. doi:10.1002/jor.22459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA (2008) Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 18(3):212–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hart AJ, Ilo K, Underwood R, Cann P, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Skinner J (2011) The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(3):315–320. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hart AJ, Muirhead-Allwood S, Porter M, Matthies A, Ilo K, Maggiore P, Underwood R, Cann P, Cobb J, Skinner JA (2013) Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? Multivariate analysis of two hundred and seventy-six components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(8):678–685. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haughom BD, Erickson BJ, Hellman MD, Jacobs JJ (2015) Do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(8):2521–2529. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4227-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gross TP, Liu F (2012) Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(1):27–34. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1290-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ebramzadeh E, Campbell P, Tan TL, Nelson SD, Sangiorgio SN (2015) Can wear explain the histological variation around metal-on-metal total hips? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):487–494. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3874-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pattyn CA, Lauwagie SN, Verdonk RC (2011) Whole blood metal ion concentrations in correlation with activity level in three different metal-on-metal bearings. J Arthroplasty 26(1):58–64. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(12):1566–1574. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mathiesen EB, Lindgren JU, Blomgren GG, Reinholt FP (1991) Corrosion of modular hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(4):569–575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kwon YM, Lombardi AV, Jacobs JJ, Fehring TK, Lewis CG, Cabanela ME (2014) Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the american association of hip and knee surgeons, the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons, and the hip society. J Bone and Joint Surg 96(1):e4. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Matharu GS, Mellon SJ, Murray DW, Pandit HG (2015) Follow-up guidance for metal-on-metal hip replacement patients should be updated. Int Orthop 39(3):609–610. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2667-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Silverman EJ, Ashley B, Sheth NP (2016) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: is there still a role in 2016? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9(1):93–96. doi:10.1007/s12178-016-9323-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wyles CC, Van Demark IIIRE, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT (2014) High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2):509–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kwon YM, Antoci V Jr, Leone WA, Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Liow MH (2016) Utility of serum inflammatory and synovial fluid counts in the diagnosis of infection in taper corrosion of dual taper modular stems. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.020

    Google Scholar 

  47. Paul HY, Cross MB, Moric M, Levine BR, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Jacobs JJ, Della Valle CJ (2015) Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):498–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, Cameron A, Schiller K, Booth RE Jr, Parvizi J (2015) The alpha-defensin test for periprosthetic joint infection outperforms the leukocyte esterase test strip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(1):198–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. De Pasquale D, Stea S, Squarzoni S, Bordini B, Amabile M, Catalani S, Apostoli P, Toni A (2014) Metal-on-metal hip prostheses: correlation between debris in the synovial fluid and levels of cobalt and chromium ions in the bloodstream. Int Orthop 38(3):469–475. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2137-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Engh CA, MacDonald SJ, Sritulanondha S, Korczak A, Naudie D, Engh C (2014) Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a five-year, prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(6):448–455. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kwon YM, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Cabanela ME, Jacobs JJ (2014) Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty 29(11):2060–2064. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hothi HS, Berber R, Panagiotopoulos AC, Whittaker RK, Rhead C, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2016) Clinical significance of corrosion of cemented femoral stems in metal-on-metal hips: a retrieval study. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3116-4

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Bandi AS, Maggiore P, Tarassoli P, Sampson B, Skinner AJ (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(10):1308–1313. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.26249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Williams DH, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2011) Prevalence of pseudotumor in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(23):2164–2171. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Liow MH, Urish KL, Preffer FI, Nielson GP, Kwon YM (2016) Metal ion levels are not correlated with histopathology of adverse local tissue reactions in taper corrosion of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.041

    Google Scholar 

  56. Reito A, Parkkinen J, Puolakka T, Pajamaki J, Eskelinen A (2015) Diagnostic utility of joint fluid metal ion measurement for histopathological findings in metal-on-metal hip replacements. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:393. doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0851-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Krachler M, Thomsen M, Heisel C (2009) Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33(6):1531–1536. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0729-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kwon YM, Liow MH, Dimitriou D, Tsai TY, Freiberg AA, Rubash HE (2016) What is the natural history of “asymptomatic” pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty? Minimum 4-year metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging longitudinal study. J Arthroplast

  59. Kwon YM, Lombardi AV, Jacobs JJ, Fehring TK, Lewis CG, Cabanela ME (2014) Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(1):e4. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Reito A, Moilanen T, Puolakka T, Pajamaki J, Eskelinen A (2014) Repeated metal ion measurements in patients with high risk metal-on-metal hip replacement. Int Orthop 38(7):1353–1361. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2300-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kwon YM, Dimitriou D, Liow MH, Tsai TY, Li G (2016) Is ultrasound as useful as metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging in longitudinal surveillance of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.033

    Google Scholar 

  62. Siddiqui IA, Sabah SA, Satchithananda K, Lim AK, Cro S, Henckel J, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2014) A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MARS MRI and ultrasound of the painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 85(4):375–382. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.908345

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kwon YM (2014) Cross-sectional imaging in evaluation of soft tissue reactions secondary to metal debris. J Arthroplast 29(4):653–656. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. European Commission. The safety of metal-on-metal joint replacements with a particular focus on hip implants. European Commission 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_042.pdf (date last assessed 27 April 2016)

  65. Masri BA, Mitchell PA, Duncan CP (2005) Removal of solidly fixed implants during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(1):18–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fabi D, Levine B, Paprosky W, Della Valle C, Sporer S, Klein G, Levine H, Hartzband M (2012) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics 35(7):e1009–1016. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120621-12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon Y-M, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard D, Murray D, Gill H (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91(8):1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ (2014) Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes. Hip Int: J Clini Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 24(4):311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulos G (2011) Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 42(2):259–269. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2011.01.003, ix

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Munro JT, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2014) High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2):523–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Liddle AD, Satchithananda K, Henckel J, Sabah SA, Vipulendran KV, Lewis A, Skinner JA, Mitchell AW, Hart AJ (2013) Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in a tertiary center: a prospective study of 39 hips with between 1 and 4 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop 84(3):237–245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Rajpura A, Porter ML, Gambhir AK, Freemont AJ, Board TN (2010) Clinical experience of revision of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL). Hip Int: J Clini Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 21(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Fink Barnes LA, Johnson SH, Patrick DA Jr, Macaulay W (2014) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip arthroplasty: two to five year outcomes in men younger than sixty five years. Int Orthop 38(12):2435–2440. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2506-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pelclova D, Sklensky M, Janicek P, Lach K (2012) Severe cobalt intoxication following hip replacement revision: clinical features and outcome. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 50(4):262–265. doi:10.3109/15563650.2012.670244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Berstock JR, Baker RP, Bannister GC, Case CP (2014) Histology of failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty; three distinct sub-types. Hip Int 24(3):243–248. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Perino G, Ricciardi BF, Jerabek SA, Martignoni G, Wilner G, Maass D, Goldring SR, Purdue PE (2014) Implant based differences in adverse local tissue reaction in failed total hip arthroplasties: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. BMC Clin Pathol 14:39. doi:10.1186/1472-6890-14-39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Higgs GB, Hanzlik JA, MacDonald DW, Gilbert JL, Rimnac CM, Kurtz SM, Implant Research Center Writing C (2013) Is increased modularity associated with increased fretting and corrosion damage in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty devices?: a retrieval study. J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):2–6. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.040

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Tan SC, Teeter MG, Del Balso C, Howard JL, Lanting BA (2015) Effect of taper design on trunnionosis in metal on polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(7):1269–1272. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Nassif NA, Nawabi DH, Stoner K, Elpers M, Wright T, Padgett DE (2014) Taper design affects failure of large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2):564–571. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3115-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Panagiotidou A, Meswania J, Hua J, Muirhead-Allwood S, Hart A, Blunn G (2013) Enhanced wear and corrosion in modular tapers in total hip replacement is associated with the contact area and surface topography. J Orthop Res 31(12):2032–2039. doi:10.1002/jor.22461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. De Martino I, Assini JB, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Westrich GH (2015) Corrosion and fretting of a modular hip system: a retrieval analysis of 60 rejuvenate stems. J Arthroplasty 30(8):1470–1475. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S (2002) A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 401:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Min Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liow, M.H.L., Kwon, YM. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 885–892 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3305-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3305-1

Keywords

Navigation