Skip to main content
Log in

Taper Design Affects Failure of Large-head Metal-on-metal Total Hip Replacements

  • Symposium: 2013 Hip Society Proceedings
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties have demonstrated poor survival. Damage at the taper-trunnion junction is a contributing factor; however, the influence of junction design is not well understood.

Questions/purposes

(1) Does taper type affect fretting, corrosion, and volumetric wear at the junction? (2) Do taper types have different wear patterns? (3) Does larger offset or head diameter increase fretting, corrosion, and wear? (4) Is the extent of fretting and corrosion associated with earlier failure?

Methods

Taper damage in 40 retrieved heads was subjectively graded for fretting and corrosion, and wear was determined with high-resolution confocal measurement. Taper types (11/13, 12/14, and Type 1) differed by angle, distal diameter, and contact length; Type 1 were thinnest and 11/13 had longer contact lengths.

Results

Fretting scores were higher in 11/13 than in Type 1 tapers. Volumetric wear and wear rates did not differ among types. Uniform, circumferential, and longitudinal wear patterns were observed in all types, but fretting, corrosion, and wear did not differ among the patterns. Head diameter and lateral offset did not correlate with fretting, corrosion, or wear. No correlation was found between fretting, corrosion, or wear and length of implantation.

Conclusions

In general, thicker tapers with longer contact lengths were associated with greater fretting scores, whereas no relationship was found among the three designs for corrosion scores or volumetric wear. This finding suggests that trunnion diameter and engagement length are important factors to consider when improving taper-trunnion junction design.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2A–B
Fig. 3
Fig. 4A–C
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop NEH. High friction moments in large hard-on-hard hip replacement bearings in conditions of poor lubrication. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:807–813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolland B, Maul C, Cook RB, Roques A, Wood R, Latham JM. Profiling tapers for retrieval analysis of metal on metal modular heads. Bone Jt J Orthop Proc Suppl. 2013;95:139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolland BJRF, Culliford DJ, Langton DJ, Millington JPS, Arden NK, Latham JM. High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:608–615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cales B, Stefani Y. Risks and advantages in standardization of bores and cones for heads in modular hip prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43:62–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chana R, Esposito C, Campbell PA, Walter WK, Walter WL. Mixing and matching causing taper wear: corrosion associated with pseudotumour formation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:281–286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;271:305–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper H, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1655–1661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dyrkacz RMR, Brandt J-M, Ojo OA, Turgeon TR, Wyss UP. The influence of head size on corrosion and fretting behaviour at the head-neck interface of artificial hip joints. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1036–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garellick G, Karrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Goteborg, Sweden: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report; 2010. Available at: www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2010-2-eng.sflb.ashx. Accessed May 28, 2013.

  10. Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ. In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:1533–1544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:149–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Langton DJ, Sidaginamale R, Lord JK, Nargol AVF, Joyce TJ. Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings. Bone Jt Res. 2012;1:56–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mercer D, Bergman N. Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Annual Report 2011. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide SA Australia: Austrialian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry; 2011.

  14. Meyer H, Mueller T, Goldau G, Chamaon K, Ruetschi M, Lohmann CH. Corrosion at the cone/taper interface leads to failure of large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties. Clin. Orthop. 2012;470:3101–3108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephanie Tow for her assistance with this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader A. Nassif MD.

Additional information

One of the authors (TW) received institutional support from Synthes Spine, West Chester, PA, USA, and Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA. One of the authors (DEP) is a consultant for Mako, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, and Stryker. One or more of the authors has a royalty agreement with Mako (DEP) and Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland (TW). One of the authors (TW) has ownership interest in Exactech, Gainesville, FL, USA.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA-approval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

This work was performed in the Mary and Fred Trump Institute for Implant Analysis (Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA).

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigation were conducted in conformity with ethical principle of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Nassif, N.A., Nawabi, D.H., Stoner, K. et al. Taper Design Affects Failure of Large-head Metal-on-metal Total Hip Replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 564–571 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3115-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3115-3

Keywords

Navigation