Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative prediction of muscular invasiveness of bladder cancer with radiomic features on conventional MRI and its high-order derivative maps

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine radiomic features which are capable of reflecting muscular invasiveness of bladder cancer (BC) and propose a non-invasive strategy for the differentiation of muscular invasiveness preoperatively.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients with clinicopathologically confirmed BC were included in this retrospective study. A total of 118 cancerous volumes of interest (VOI) were segmented from patients’ T2 weighted MR images (T2WI), including 34 non-muscle invasive bladder carcinomas (NMIBCs, stage <T2) and 84 muscle invasive ones (MIBCs, stage ≥T2). The radiomic features quantifying tumor signal intensity and textures were extracted from each VOI and its high-order derivative maps to characterize heterogeneity of tumor tissues. Statistical analysis was used to build radiomic signatures with significant inter-group differences of NMIBCs and MIBCs. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and a support vector machine (SVM)-based feature selection and classification strategy were proposed to first rebalance the imbalanced sample size and then further select the most predictive and compact signature subset to verify its differentiation capability.

Results

From each tumor VOI, a total of 63 radiomic features were derived and 30 of them showed significant inter-group differences (P ≤ 0.01). By using the SVM-based feature selection algorithm with rebalanced samples, an optimal subset including 13 radiomic signatures was determined. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index were improved to 0.8610 and 0.7192, respectively.

Conclusion

3D radiomic signatures derived from T2WI and its high-order derivative maps could reflect muscular invasiveness of bladder cancer, and the proposed strategy can be used to facilitate the preoperative prediction of muscular invasiveness in patients with bladder cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, et al. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark PE, et al. (2015) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: bladder cancer. Natl Compr Cancer Netw: 30–33.

  3. Grob B, Macchia R (2001) Radical transurethral resection in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Endourol 15(4):419–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein J, et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19(3):666–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aerts HJ, et al. (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Makram M, et al. (2003) The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumours. Eur Urol 43(3):241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakse G, et al. (2004) A second-look TUR in T1 transitional cell carcinoma: why? Eur Urol 45(5):539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mackin D, et al. (2015) Measuring computed tomography scanner variability of radiomics features. Invest Radiol 50(11):757–765

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang YQ, et al. (2016) Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(18):2157–2164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee G., et al. (2016) Radiomics and its emerging role in lung cancer research, imaging biomarkers and clinical management: State of the art. Eur J Radiol

  11. Summers RM (2016) Texture analysis in radiology: does the emperor have no clothes? Abdom Radiol (NY).

  12. Shi Z, et al. (2013) Characterization of texture features of bladder carcinoma and the bladder wall on MRI: initial experience. Acad Radiol 20(8):930–938

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu X, et al. (2016) Differentiating bladder carcinoma from bladder wall using 3D textural features: an initial study. SPIE 2016:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu X, et al. (2017) Three-dimensional texture features from intensity and high-order derivative maps for the discrimination between bladder tumors and wall tissues via MRI. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1522-8

  15. Rosenkrantz AB, et al. (2013) Utility of quantitative MRI metrics for assessment of stage and grade of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 201(6):1254–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hall marks of cancer. Cell 100(57):57–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiagalingam S (2006) A cascade of modules of a network defines cancer progression. Cancer Res 66(15):7379–7385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Eary JF, et al. (2008) Spatial heterogeneity in sarcoma 18F-FDG uptake as a predictor of patient outcome. J Nucl Med 49(12):1973–1979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lertampaiporn S, et al. (2013) Heterogeneous ensemble approach with discriminative features and modified-SMOTEbagging for pre-miRNA classification. Nucleic Acids Res 41(1):e21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chicklore S, et al. (2013) Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(1):133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mu W, et al. (2015) Staging of cervical cancer based on tumor heterogeneity characterized by texture features on (18)F-FDG PET images. Phys Med Biol 60(13):5123–5139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon HJ, Kim Y, Kim BS (2015) Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur Radiol 25(12):3648–3658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fehr D, et al. (2015) Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images. PNAS 112(46):E6265–E6273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ganeshan B, et al. (2010) Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage. Cancer Imaging 10:137–143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chae H-D, et al. (2014) Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas1. Radiology 273(1):285–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hwang In-pyeong, et al. (2015) Persistent pure ground-glass nodules larger than 5 mm: differentiation of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas from preinvasive lesions or minimally invasive adenocarcinomas using texture analysis. Investig Radiol 50(11):798–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Song B, et al. (2014) Volumetric texture features from higher-order images for diagnosis of colon lesions via CT colonography. Int J CARS: 1–11

  28. Hu Y, et al. (2016) Texture feature extraction and analysis for polyp differentiation via computed tomography colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging

  29. Xiao D, et al. (2016) 3D detection and extraction of bladder tumors via MR virtual cystoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(1):89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X, et al. (2015) Quantitative analysis of bladder wall thickness for magnetic resonance cystoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(10):2402–2409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haralick R, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I (1973) Texture features for image classification. Trans Syst Man Cybern 3(6):610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagarajan MB, et al. (2013) Computer-aided diagnosis in phase contrast imaging X-ray computed tomography for quantitative characterization of ex vivo human patellar cartilage. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(10):2896–2903

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Simoes R, Walsum A, Slump C (2014) Classification and localization of early-stage Alzheimer’s disease in magnetic resonance images using a patch-based classifier ensemble. Neuroradiology: 1–12.

  34. Chawla NV, et al. (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 2002(16):321–357

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang G, et al. (2012) Computer-aided diagnosis in CT colonography based on bi-labeled classifier. Int J CARS 7:S274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Han F, et al. (2015) Texture feature analysis for computer-aided diagnosis on pulmonary nodules. J Digit Imaging 28(1):99–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fetit A, et al. (2015) Three-dimensional textural features of conventional MRI improve diagnostic classification of childhood brain tumours. NMR Biomed 28(9):1174–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Carrobles M, et al. (2015) Influence of texture and colour in breast TMA classification. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0141556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zayed N, Elnemr H (2015) Statistical analysis of Haralick texture features to discriminate lung abnormalities. Int J Biomed Imaging 2015:267807

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Golub T, Slonim D, Tamayo P (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286:531–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu Z, Tan M (2008) ROC-based utility function maximization for feature selection and classification with applications to high-dimensional protease data. Biometrics 64:1155–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Correas JM, et al. (2016) Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of real-time shear-wave elastography. Radiology 275(1):280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sevcenco S, et al. (2014) Prospective evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI of the bladder as a biomarker for prediction of bladder cancer aggressiveness. Urol Oncol 32(8):1166–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Takeuchi M, et al. (2009) Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted mr imaging—accuracy for diagnosing t stage and estimating histologic grade1. Radiology 251(1):112–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenkrantz AB, et al. (2015) Whole-lesion diffusion metrics for assessment of bladder cancer aggressiveness. Abdom Imaging 40(2):327–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Long-Biao Cui from Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University for the inspiration and discussion of the research idea in this study, and Mr. Dan Xiao for his technical support on medical image processing. More importantly, we would like to thank all editors and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful, helpful, and thought-provoking suggestions on the quality improvement of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongbing Lu.

Ethics declarations

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 81230035; Shaanxi Provincial Foundation for Social Development and Key Technology under Grant Nos. 2015SF177 and 2016SF302.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.

Additional information

Xiaopan Xu and Yang Liu are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, X. et al. Preoperative prediction of muscular invasiveness of bladder cancer with radiomic features on conventional MRI and its high-order derivative maps. Abdom Radiol 42, 1896–1905 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1079-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1079-6

Keywords

Navigation