Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary regarding the inter-reader reproducibility of PI-RADS version 2

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277:142818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park SY, Jung DC, Oh YT, et al. (2016) Prostate cancer: PI-RADS version 2 helps preoperatively predict clinically significant cancers. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.16151133

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. (2015) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4015-6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D, et al. (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 Lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152542

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric mr imaging. Radiology 277(3):741–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269(2):482–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marks LS (2016) Some prostate cancers are invisible to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Br J Urol (in press)

  10. Kasel-Seibert M, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. (2016) Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 85(4):726–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43(6):543–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shankar V, Bangdiwala SI (2014) Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lantz CA, Nebenzahl E (1996) Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 49(4):431–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, et al. (2002) Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224(3):871–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E (2009) Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 252(3):665–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, et al. (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):813–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karmazyn B, Tawadros A, Delaney LR, et al. (2015) Ultrasound classification of solitary renal cysts in children. J Pediatr Urol 11(3):149 e141–149 e146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenkrantz AB, Oto A, Turkbey B, Westphalen AC (2016) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look. AJR Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15765

    Google Scholar 

  19. Puech P, Randazzo M, Ouzzane A, et al. (2015) How are we going to train a generation of radiologists (and urologists) to read prostate MRI? Curr Opin Urol 25(6):522–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Litjens GJ, Barentsz JO, Karssemeijer N, Huisman HJ (2015) Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI. Eur Radiol 25(11):3187–3199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Niaf E, Lartizien C, Bratan F, et al. (2014) Prostate focal peripheral zone lesions: characterization at multiparametric MR imaging–influence of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Radiology 271(3):761–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz

  2. Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA

    Daniel J. Margolis

Authors
  1. Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel J. Margolis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew B. Rosenkrantz.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Rosenkrantz: Royalties from Thieme Medical Publishers. Margolis: None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenkrantz, A.B., Margolis, D.J. Commentary regarding the inter-reader reproducibility of PI-RADS version 2. Abdom Radiol 41, 907–909 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0756-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0756-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation