Abstract
Purpose
To determine multi-parametric MRI features that can help differentiate malignant omental caking from benign omental thickening in the setting of portal hypertension.
Methods
We identified 19 patients with an abnormal omentum on MRI and an available reference standard: 11 patients with portal hypertension and benign omental thickening (9 male, 2 female, mean age 58 ± 6 years) and 8 patients with metastatic omental caking (4 male, 4 female, mean age 61 ± 13 years). Criteria for benign omental thickening were no evidence of malignancy for at least 24 months of follow-up (n = 7), negative ascites cytology (n = 2), or absence of malignancy on pathologic analysis of liver explant (n = 2). Criteria for omental malignancy were positive omental biopsy (n = 6) or ascites cytology (n = 2). Two radiologists (R1 and R2) evaluated characteristics of the thickened omentum on MRI.
Results
Findings occurring with significantly higher frequency in malignant omental caking were hyperintensity on high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (R1 88% vs. 0%, R2 88% vs. 0%), hyperenhancement (R1 75% vs. 0%, R2 75% vs. 0%), and convex outer omental contour (R1 88% vs. 0%, R2 75% vs. 9%) (all p ≤ 0.001); discrete omental nodules were significantly more frequent in malignant omental thickening for R1 (63% vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Features not significantly different between groups included decreased ADC, T2 hyperintensity, vessels coursing through the omentum, moderate/large volume ascites, splenomegaly, and mesenteric edema (all p ≥ 0.058).
Conclusion
Abnormal signal on DWI, hyperenhancement, and convex outer contour are helpful MRI features to differentiate malignant from benign omental thickening.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mamlouk MD, Vansonnenberg E, Shankar S, Silverman SG (2011) Omental cakes: unusual aetiologies and CT appearances. Insights Imaging 2(4):399–408. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0105-4
Sompayrac SW, Mindelzun RE, Silverman PM, Sze R (1997) The greater omentum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(3):683–687. doi:10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057515
Yoo E, Kim JH, Kim MJ, et al. (2007) Greater and lesser omenta: normal anatomy and pathologic processes. Radiographics 27(3):707–720. doi:10.1148/rg.273065085
Sangster GP, Previgliano CH, Nader M, Chwoschtschinsky E, Heldmann MG (2013) MDCT imaging findings of liver cirrhosis: spectrum of hepatic and extrahepatic abdominal complications. HPB Surgery 2013
Healy J, Reznek R (1998) The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes. Eur Radiol 8(6):886–900
Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Morgan VA, Giles SL, deSouza NM (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging of peritoneal disease for noninvasive staging of advanced ovarian cancer. Radiographics 30(5):1269–1285. doi:10.1148/rg.305105073
Chopra S, Dodd GD III, Chintapalli KN, Esola CC, Ghiatas AA (1999) Mesenteric, omental, and retroperitoneal edema in cirrhosis: frequency and spectrum of CT findings. Radiology 211(3):737–742
Semelka RC (2010) Abdominal-Pelvic MRI, vol. 3. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell
Katyal S, Oliver JH 3rd, Peterson MS, et al. (2000) Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 216(3):698–703. doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se24698
Motherby H, Nadjari B, Friegel P, et al. (1999) Diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 20(6):350–357
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doshi, A.M., Campbell, N., Hajdu, C.H. et al. Differentiation of Malignant Omental Caking from Benign Omental Thickening using MRI. Abdom Imaging 40, 1157–1163 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0259-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0259-x