In this issue of the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Pfister et al. [1] evaluate the performance of 18F-fluoroethylcholine (18F-FEC) and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients undergoing salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). The introduction of novel imaging modalities and tracers has increased the detection of oligometastatic PCa recurrence, potentially justifying the use of sLND rather than a systemic approach. The present study is premised on the notion that radiopharmaceutical agents can be useful for guiding surgical procedures in cases of predominant nodal recurrence of PCa. This is a topic of great interest to urologists, radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians. What evidence must we consider for the use of sLND? Could extended LND rather than sLND during radical prostatectomy (RP) improve patient survival? What is the best imaging modality for ensuring appropriate treatment?
These closely related questions are important because they prompt us to examine the value of clinical trials in the area of sLND in PCa. The literature is lacking in both randomized trials comparing sLND with a control group treated with current best practice and prospective case–control studies evaluating the impact of PET imaging for the detection of lymph node metastases before or after RP. The “scientific run” to the best imaging modality and highest-performing tracer is justified only if they provide a survival benefit and improved quality of life for patients with oligometastatic PCa.
In addressing this issue, therefore, key points to consider in the design of future studies include (1) selection of the patient population, (2) previous therapies and ongoing androgen therapy, (3) extension of sLND, (4) the definition of endpoints and outcomes, (5) a comparison of different imaging modalities in the same population, and (6) whom to randomize—for example, the patients, the surgeons, or the imaging technologists?
In the study by Pfister et al. [1], 66 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 38 underwent 18F-FEC and 28 underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to sLND. Differences between the two populations must be considered, including demographic characteristics, primary treatments, and follow-up management. In our opinion, the selection of patients is the key driver for the trial. Only patients with well-defined treatment of the primary tumor should be included.
The extension of lymphadenectomy during RP should be defined, even though the role of pelvic lymph node dissection remains one of the most controversial areas in the management of clinically localized PCa. However, recent advances in our understanding of tumor biology and the introduction of a new PCa classification system [2] should enable better stratification of patients and should provide information about the best treatment strategy.
Any systemic or combination therapy should be avoided before sLND procedures. This is of pivotal importance, given the potential effects of hormone or radiation therapy on PET/CT performance. In our experience, patients with hormone-sensitive PCa and those with castration-resistant cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy and treatment with new anti-hormonal agents (e.g. abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide), respectively, demonstrate a significant reduction in radiolabeled choline PET/CT uptake in the lymph nodes after the administration of drugs (Fig. 1). In addition, careful selection of the time from primary treatment to sLND and the PSA cutoff before salvage surgery is critical, because they will affect the sensitivity and specificity of nuclear imaging modalities. In the study by Pfister et al. [1], PSA values ranged from 0.04 to 8.4 ng/mL, with a median of 2.7 and 2.35 ng/mL, respectively, for 18F-FEC and 68Ga-PSMA. However, PSA alone cannot predict a positive PET/CT, because the sensitivity and specificity of radiolabeled choline in these patients is increased in cases of low PSA doubling time and high PSA velocity [3].
Accuracy is a frequent endpoint in diagnostic studies. However, a series of different outcomes should be addressed in PCa patient candidates for sLND. For example, the current literature shows that some patients benefit from sLND, with approximately 9–19 % remaining free from biochemical recurrence, and approximately 26–34 % remaining free from clinical recurrence [4, 5]. However, these data indicate that the benefit of sLND in the majority of cases is prolonging survival and/or postponing hormone therapy, but not achieving a complete cure. Indeed, whether these patients would have died from PCa without the removal of the lymph node metastases is unknown. Information about the site of nodal relapse may be suboptimal, particularly for sacral and retroperitoneal regions. Extended retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is likely the only approach for limiting the effect of the Will Rogers phenomenon. The risk of surgical complications is obviously also an ethical concern. Although Pfister et al. [1] reported no data about site/region accuracy for either 18 F-FEC or 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, reports available in the literature indicate that the accuracy of radiolabeled choline for the detection of retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence ranges from 20 to 40 % [6–8], thus guiding the use of extended sLND in only a small percentage of patients.
Another important issue is the comparison of different imaging modalities, such as diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline or 68Ga-PSMA, in the same population. The study by Pfister et al. [1] was performed in different study populations. Although patient characteristics were similar, certain biological tumor features would have affected the accuracy of both radiopharmaceutical agents. Most published papers, however, have discussed the performance of DW-MRI in lymph node staging in PCa before primary treatment. The reliability of the technique for detecting clinical lymph node relapse after primary treatment is still unknown, and therefore warrants further investigation [3].
Finally, several medical reasons can be considered as confounders, both surgical (i.e. individual surgical volume, expertise and commitment to performing sLND) and imaging issues (i.e. blinded analysis, reading experience and reproducible methodology).
In conclusion, while a prospective randomized trial may provide definitive answers to the abovementioned “clinical questions” concerning the role of sLND, conversely, it could lead to misleading conclusions. Therefore, it is extremely important to adopt different treatment regimens by considering the biology and behavior of PCa. In this regard, careful patient selection, novel biomarkers, and developments in nuclear medicine will certainly help in resolving these issues.
References
Pfister D, Porres D, Heidenreich A, Heidegger I, Knuechel R, Steib F, et al. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC than with F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016. doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3366-9. In press.
Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Dalahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:244–52.
Abdollah F, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Stenzl A, Stief C, Tombal B, et al. Contemporary role of salvage lymphadenectomy in patients with recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67:839–49.
Zattoni F, Nehra A, Murphy CR, Rangel L, Mynderse L, Lowe V, et al. Mid-term outcomes following salvage lymph node dissection for prostate cancer nodal recurrence status post–radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.008. In press.
Ost P, Bossi A, Decaestecker K, De Meerleer G, Giannarini G, et al. Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2015;67:852–63.
Rigatti P, Suardi N, Briganti A, Da Pozzo LF, Tutolo M, Villa L, et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol. 2011;60:935–43.
Suardi N, Gandaglia G, Gallina A, Di Trapani E, Scattoni V, Vizziello D, et al. Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Eur Urol. 2015;67:299–309.
Rinnab L, Mottaghy FM, Simon J, Volkmer BG, de Petriconi R, Hautmann RE, et al. [11 C] Choline PET/CT for targeted salvage lymph node dissection in patients with biochemical recurrence after primary curative therapy for prostate cancer. Urol Inter. 2008;81:191–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Not necessary.
Additional information
This Editorial Commentary refers to the article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3366-9
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zattoni, F., Guttilla, A. & Evangelista, L. Can 68GA-PSMA or radiolabeled choline PET/CT guide salvage lymph node dissection in recurrent prostate cancer?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43, 1407–1409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3401-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3401-x