Skip to main content
Log in

MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: an implemented program

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Emergent MRI is now a viable alternative to CT for evaluating appendicitis while avoiding the detrimental effects of ionizing radiation. However, primary employment of MRI in the setting of clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis has remained significantly underutilized.

Objective

To describe our institution’s development and the results of a fully implemented clinical program using MRI as the primary imaging evaluation for children with suspected appendicitis.

Materials and methods

A four-sequence MRI protocol consisting of coronal and axial single-shot turbo spin-echo (SS-TSE) T2, coronal spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR), and axial SS-TSE T2 with fat saturation was performed on 208 children, ages 3 to 17 years, with clinically suspected appendicitis. No intravenous or oral contrast material was administered. No sedation was administered. Data collection includes two separate areas: time parameter analysis and MRI diagnostic results.

Results

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for pediatric appendicitis indicated a sensitivity of 97.6% (CI: 87.1–99.9%), specificity 97.0% (CI: 93.2–99.0%), positive predictive value 88.9% (CI: 76.0–96.3%), and negative predictive value 99.4% (CI: 96.6–99.9%). Time parameter analysis indicated clinical feasibility, with time requested to first sequence obtained mean of 78.7 +/− 52.5 min, median 65 min; first-to-last sequence time stamp mean 14.2 +/− 8.8 min, median 12 min; last sequence to report mean 57.4 +/− 35.2 min, median 46 min. Mean age was 11.2 +/− 3.6 years old. Girls represented 57% of patients.

Conclusion

MRI is an effective and efficient method of imaging children with clinically suspected appendicitis. Using an expedited four-sequence protocol, sensitivity and specificity are comparable to CT while avoiding the detrimental effects of ionizing radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hernanz-Schulman M (2010) CT and US in the diagnosis of appendicitis: an argument for CT. Radiology 255:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Callahan M, Rodriguez D, Taylor G (2002) CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 224:325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner D, Hall E (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Strouse P (2010) Pediatric appendicitis: an argument for US. Radiology 255:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tkacz J, Anderson S, Soto J (2009) MR imaging in gastrointestinal emergencies. Radiographics 29:1767–1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hormann M, Paya K, Eibenberger K et al (1998) MR imaging in children with nonperforated acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced MR imaging in sonographically selected cases. AJR 171:467–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cobben L, Groot I, Kingma L et al (2009) A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 19:1175–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang N et al (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259:231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edelstein W, Mahesh M, Carrino J (2010) MRI: time is dose–and money and versatility. JACR 7:650–652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barger R, Nandalur K (2010) Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of appendicitis in adults: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 17:1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doria A, Moineddin R, Kellenberger C et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? a meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf H (2002) Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT—a prospective randomized study. Radiology 223:633–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldisserotto M, Valduga S, da Cunha CF (2008) MR imaging evaluation of the normal appendix in children and adolescents. Radiology 249:278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F et al (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology 241:175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our pediatric surgical colleagues (Drs. Robert Cilley, Brett Engbrecht, Mary Santos, Dorothy Rocourt, Kerry Fagelman and Peter Dillon) for their support. We also thank Tim Elliot (Radiology Information Systems) for assistance with time parameter analysis and Allen Kunselman (Biostatistical Consulting Service) for statistical analysis. We are also grateful to all our MR technologists (including team leaders Jason Hatter, Joan Hartman and Dana Fortney).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael M. Moore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, M.M., Gustas, C.N., Choudhary, A.K. et al. MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: an implemented program. Pediatr Radiol 42, 1056–1063 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2412-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2412-4

Keywords

Navigation