Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical audit of tetanus prophylaxis in open hand surgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Requirements of wound management include wound excision, cleansing, administration of antibacterials and prophylaxis against Tetanus. We performed a prospective study to highlight areas of concern and discrepancy between the national recommendations of Tetanus prophylaxis in patients with open hand injuries and the actual practice of a tertiary plastic surgery centre.

Methods

Data were collected on Tetanus immunisation status, wound type and prophylaxis administered to patients admitted to day surgery unit for wound exploration. Following the first group (A) analysis, teaching on Tetanus prophylaxis was provided. Second group (B) of patients was recruited to the study 8 weeks later.

Results

Both the quality of documentation and correct type of Tetanus prophylaxis administered improved by 46 and 66 %, respectively, in the post-teaching group.

Conclusions

Simple measures like teaching and distribution of guidelines improved clinical practice and reduced number of clinical errors.

Level of evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hayashida K, Murakami C, Fujioka M (2012) Tetanus following replantation of an amputated finger: a case report. J Med Case Rep 6(1):343

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brand DA, Acampora D, Gottlieb LD et al (1983) Adequacy of antitetanus prophylaxis in six hospital emergency rooms. Engl J Med 309(11):636–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Talan DA, Abrahamian FM, Moran GJ et al (2004) Tetanus immunity and physician compliance with tetanus prophylaxis practices among emergency department patients presenting with wounds. Ann Emerg Med 43:305–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The green book of immunisations against infectious disease, Chapter 30: Tetanus. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/148506/Green-Book-Chapter-30-dh_103982.pdf (viewed on 13th March 2014)

  5. Tetanus surveillance—United States, 2001–2008. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Apr 1;60(12):365–9

  6. Anuradha S (2006) Tetanus in adults—a continuing problem: an analysis of 217 patients over 3 years from Delhi, India, with special emphasis on predictors of mortality. Med J Malaysia 61(1):7–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chukwubike OA, God'spower AE (2009) A 10-year review of outcome of management of tetanus in adults at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Ann Afr Med 8(3):168–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Savage EJ, Nash S, McGuinness A et al (2007) Audit of tetanus prevention knowledge and practices in accident and emergency departments in England. Emerg Med J 24(6):417–21

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarwar U, Javed M, Wilson-Jones N (2014) Tetanus prophylaxis: are we getting it right? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(2):287–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adeboye KA, Sangowawa O (2002) Tetanus prophylaxis in the A&E department. J R Soc Med 95(3):113

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stubbe M, Mortelmans LJ, Desruelles D et al (2007) Improving tetanus prophylaxis in the emergency department: a prospective, double-blind cost-effectiveness study. Emerg Med J 24:648–53

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombet I, Saguez C, Sanson-Le Pors MJ et al (2005) Diagnosis of tetanus immunization status: multicenter assessment of a rapid biological test. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12(9):1057–62

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edsall G, Elliott MW, Peebles TC et al (1967) Excessive use of tetanus toxoid boosters. JAMA 202(1):111–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments to M. Moustaki for her help with the data collection and statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The study was approved by the clinical audit department from St Thomas Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jurga Pikturnaite.

Additional information

This work has been in part presented at the ASIT 2013 conference, Manchester, and as a result, its abstract was published in the International Journal of Surgery (2013).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pikturnaite, J., Ahmed, J. & James, M. Clinical audit of tetanus prophylaxis in open hand surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 38, 221–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-1045-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-1045-2

Keywords

Navigation