Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Key factors in reducing morbidity following inguinal node dissections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Inguinal node dissection is associated with high incidence of post-operative morbidity.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent inguinal node dissection at The Christie Hospital between 2001 and 2008. Two hundred thirty two patients undergoing 247 inguinal node dissection outcomes were assessed with a median follow-up of 29 months (range 5 to 75).

Results

Our overall complication rate was 61 %. Our wound infection rate is 34 % with 10 % wound necrosis, 25 % wound breakdown, 35 % seroma, 23 % lymphoedema and 0.4 % haematoma rate. The overall and individual complication rate, including infection wound breakdown, skin necrosis, seroma formation and lymphoedema, was significantly lower with use of a transverse incision for access compared to using a Lazy S and longitudinal incisions (P < 0.008 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Patients undergoing Sartorius switch had a reduced rate of seroma formation (P = 0.018). The preservation of the long saphenous veins was also associated with a reduction on the overall complication rate (P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Inguinal node dissection postoperative complications are reduced by transverse incision, Sartorius switch and preservation of the long saphenous vein.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic/risk study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rouzier R, Haddad B, Dubenard G, Dubois P, Paniel BJ (2003) Inguinofemoral dissection for carcinoma of the vulva: effect of modifications of extent and technique on morbidity and survival. J Am Coll Surg 1996(3):442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paley J, Johnson PR, Adcock LL et al (1997) The effect of Sartorius transposition on wound morbidity following inguinal–femoral lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 64:237–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spiess PE, Hermandez MS, Pettaway CA (2009) Contemporary lymph node dissection: minimizing complications. World J Urol 27(2):205–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poos HP, Kruijff S, Bastiaannet E, van Ginkel RJ, Hoekstra HJ (2007) Therapeutic groin dissection for melanoma: risk factors for short term morbidity. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(1):102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beitsch P, Balch C (1992) Operative morbidity and risk factor assessment in melanoma patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection. Am J Surg 164:462–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dardarian TS, Gray HJ, Morgan MA, Rubin SC, Randall TC (2006) Saphenous vein sparing during inguinal lymphadenectomy to reduce morbidity in patients with vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 101:140–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawton G, Rasque H, Ariyan S (2002) Preservation of muscle fascia to decrease lymphedema after complete axillary and ilioinguinofemoral lymphadenectomy for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 195:339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erba P, Wettstein R, Rieger UM, Haug M, Pierer G, Kalbermatten DF (2008) A study of the effect of Sartorius transposition on lymph flow after ilioinguinal node dissection. Ann Plast Surg 61(3):310–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M et al (2004) Operative morbidity associated with groin dissections. Surg Today 34(5):413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Urist MM, Maddox WA, Kennedy JE, Balch CM (1983) Patient risk factors and surgical morbidity after regional lymphadenectomy in 204 melanoma patients. Cancer 51:2152–2156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Serpell JW, Carne PWG, Bailey M (2003) Radical lymph node dissection for melanoma. ANZ J Surg 73:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karakousis CP (1998) Therapeutic node dissections in malignant melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 5:473–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw JH, Rumball EM (1990) Complications and local recurrence following lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 77:760–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Vries M, Vonkeman WG, Van Ginkel RJ, Hoekstra HJ (2006) Morbidity after inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:785–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baas PC, Schraffordt Koops H, Hoekstra HJ, Oosterhuis JW, Oldhoff J (1992) Groin dissection in the treatment of lower-extremity melanoma. Short-term and long-term morbidity. Arch Surg 127:281–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karakousis CP, Driscoll DL (1994) Groin dissection in malignant melanoma. Br J Surg 81:1771–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hughes TMD, Thomas JM (1999) Combined inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissection for stage II melanoma. Br J Surg 86:1493–1498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Akkooi ACJ, Bouwhuis MG, Van Geel AN et al (2007) Morbidity and prognosis after therapeutic lymph node dissections for malignant melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes TMD, A’Hern RP, Thomas JM (2000) Prognosis and surgical management of patients with palpable inguinal lymph node metastases from melanoma. Br J Surg 87:892–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Judson PL, Jonson AL, Paley PJ et al (2004) A prospective, randomized study analyzing Sartorius transposition following inguinal–femoral lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 95(1):226–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karakousis CP, Driscoll DL, Rose B, Walsh DL (1994) Groin dissection in malignant melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1(4):271–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson DE, Lo RK (1984) Complications of groin dissection in penile cancer: experience with 101 lymphadenectomies. Urology 24(4):312–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamat MR, Kulkarni JN, Tongaonkar HB (1993) Carcinoma of the penis: the Indian experience. J Surg Oncol 52:50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopes A, Hidalgo GS, Kowalski LP, Torlani H, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP (1996) Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156:1637–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravi R (1993) Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol 72:941–945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Darai E, Karaitianos I, Durand JC (1988) Treatment of inguinal lymph nodes in cancer of the penis: apropos of 85 cases treated at the Institut Curie. Ann Chir 42:748–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ayyappan K, Ananthakrishnan N, Sankaran V (1994) Can regional lymph node involvement be predicted in patients with carcinoma of the penis? Br J Urol 73:549–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA (2002) Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Centre experience. J Urol 167:1638–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith JAJ, Chang SS (2004) Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a contemporary series. J Urol 172:494–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Swan MC, Furniss D, Cassel OCS (2004) Surgical management of metastatic inguinal lymphadenopathy. BMJ 329(7477):1272–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mortenson MM, Xing Y, Weaver S et al (2008) Fibrin sealant does not decrease seroma output or time to drain removal following inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in melanoma: a randomized controlled trial (CNT 00506311). World J Surg Oncol 6:63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank The Department of Medical Records at The Christie Hospital for their assistance with this project.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK

    S. Rimouche, P. Kumar, K. Gajanan, J. V. Muphy & G. L. Ross

  2. Department of Urology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    S. Ball, V. Sangar, M. Lau, V. A. C. Ramani & N. W. Clarke

  3. Department of Medical Statistics, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    R. Swindell

  4. Department of Gynaecology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    A. Ahmed, B. Winter-Roach & R. Slade

Authors
  1. S. Rimouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Gajanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. V. Muphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Swindell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. V. Sangar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. Lau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. V. A. C. Ramani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. N. W. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. A. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. B. Winter-Roach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. R. Slade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. G. L. Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. L. Ross.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimouche, S., Ball, S., Kumar, P. et al. Key factors in reducing morbidity following inguinal node dissections. Eur J Plast Surg 36, 171–178 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0757-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0757-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation