Skip to main content
Log in

Perceiving affordances for different motor skills

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined several factors that affect people’s ability to perceive possibilities for action. In Experiment 1, 24 participants crossed expanses of various sizes in three conditions: leaping, a familiar, launching action system; arm-swinging on monkey bars, an unpracticed skill that uses the arms rather than the legs; and crawling on hands and knees, a disused skill that involves all four limbs. Before and after performing each action, participants gave verbal judgments about the largest gap they could cross. Participants scaled initial judgments to their actual abilities in all three conditions. But they considerably underestimated their abilities for leaping, a launching action, and for arm-swinging when it was performed as a launching action; judgments about crawling, a non-launching action, and arm-swinging when it was performed as a non-launching action were more accurate. Thus, launching actions appear to produce a deficit in perceiving affordances that is not ameliorated by familiarity with the action. However, after performing the actions, participants partially corrected for the deficiency and more accurately judged their abilities for launching actions—suggesting that even brief action experience facilitates the perception of affordances. In Experiment 2, we confirmed that the deficit was due to the launching nature of the leaping and arm-swinging actions in Experiment 1. We asked an additional 12 participants to cross expanses using two non-launching actions using the legs (stepping across an expanse) and the arms (reaching across an expanse). Participants were highly accurate when judging affordances for these actions, supporting launching as the cause of the underestimation reported in Experiment 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolph KE (1995) Psychophysical assessment of toddlers’ ability to cope with slopes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:734–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adolph KE (1997) Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monogr Soc ResChild Dev 62:1–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Adolph KE, Joh AS (2009) Multiple learning mechanisms in the development of action. In: Woodward A, Needham A (eds) Learning and the infant mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 172–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Adolph KE, Vereijken B, Shrout PE (2003) What changes in infant walking and why. Child Dev 74:474–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adolph KE, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Ishak S, Karasik LB, Lobo SA (2008) Locomotor experience and use of social information are posture specific. Dev Psychol 44:1705–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adolph KE, Joh AS, Eppler MA (2010) Infants’ perception of affordances of slopes under high and low friction conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:797–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adolph KE, Berger SE, Leo AJ (2011) Developmental continuity? Crawling, cruising, and walking. Dev Sci 14:306–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby BM, Heegaard JH (2002) Role of arm motion in the standing long jump. J Biomech 35:1631–1637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bril B, Breniere Y (1989) Steady-state velocity and temporal structure of gait during the first six months of autonomous walking. Hum Mov Sci 8:99–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn S, Kullmann N, Gollhofer A (2004) The effects of a sensorimotor training and a strength training on postural stabilisation, maximum isometric contraction and jump performance. Int J Sports Med 25:56–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carello C, Grosofsky A, Reichel FD, Solomon HY, Turvey MT (1989) Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecol Psychol 1:27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Piñero J, Ortega FB, Artero EG, Girela-Rejón MJ, Mora J, Sjöström M, Ruiz JR (2010) Assessing muscular strength in youth: usefulness of standing long jump as a general index of muscular fitness. J Strength Cond Res 24:1810–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comalli DM, Franchak JM, Char A, Adolph KE (2012) Younger and older adults’ perception of affordances for doorways and ledges (Manuscript in preparation)

  • Fajen BR, Riley MA, Turvey MT (2008) Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. Int J Sports Psychol 40:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Fath AJ, Fajen BR (2011) Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture. Perception 40:887–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franchak JM, Adolph KE (2012a) Gut Estimates: Pregnant women perceive possibilities for walking through doorways (Manuscript in preparation)

  • Franchak JM, Adolph KE (2012b) What infants know and what they do: Perceiving possibilities for walking through openings. Dev Psychol. doi:10.1037/a0027530 (Advance online publication)

  • Franchak JM, van der Zalm DJ, Hartzler BM, Adolph KE (2009) Perceiving affordances for navigating through openings. In: International conference on perception and action, Minneapolis, MN

  • Franchak JM, van der Zalm D, Adolph KE (2010) Learning by doing: action performance facilitates affordance perception. Vision Res 50:2758–2765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franchak JM, Celano EC, Adolph KE (2012) Perception of passage through openings cannot be explained geometric body dimensions alone (Manuscript in revision)

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi T, Takada H, Matsuura Y, Imanaka K (2004) Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users. J Exp Psychol Appl 10:55–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi T, Cinelli ME, Greig MA, Patla AE (2006) Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: adaptation to artificially altered bodily states. Exp Brain Res 175:50–59. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0525-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joh AS, Adolph KE (2006) Learning from falling. Child Dev 77:89–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joh AS, Adolph KE, Narayanan PJ, Dietz VA (2007) Gauging possibilities for action based on friction underfoot. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:1145–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella-Shaw JM, Shaw R, Turvey MT (1992) Perceiving “walk-on-able” slopes. Ecol Psychol 4:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konczak J, Meeuwsen HJ, Cress ME (1992) Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:691–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kretch KS, Adolph KE (in press) No bridge too high: Infants decide whether to cross based on bridge width not drop-off height. Dev Sci

  • Kretch KS, Adolph KE (2013) Cliff or step? Posture-specific learning at the edge of a drop-off. Child Dev 84:226–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Beall AC (1998) Visually controlled locomotion: its dependence on optic flow, three-dimensional space perception, and cognition. Ecol Psychol 10:271–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark LS (1987) Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:361–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mark LS, Baillet JA, Craver KD, Douglas SD, Fox T (1990) What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecol Psychol 2:325–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark LS, Jiang YJ, King SS, Paasche J (1999) The impact of visual exploration on judgements of whether a gap is crossable. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:287–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meylan C, McMaster T, Cronin J, Mohammad NI, Rogers C, DeKlerk M (2009) Single-leg lateral, horizontal, and vertical jump assessment: reliability, interrelationships, and ability to predict sprint and change-of-direction performance. J Strength Cond Res 23:1140–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mondschein ER, Adolph KE, Tamis-LeMonda CS (2000) Gender bias in mothers’ expectations about infant crawling. J Exp Child Psychol 77:304–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepping G, Li F (2005) Effects of response task on reaction time and the detection of affordances. Mot Control 9:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Pufall PB, Dunbar C (1992) Perceiving whether or not the world affords stepping onto and over: a developmental study. Ecol Psychol 4:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Davis TJ, Shockley K, Armstrong R (2008) Tuning into another person’s action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:919–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramenzoni VC, Davis TJ, Riley MA, Shockley K (2010) Perceiving action boundaries: learning effects in perceiving maximum jumping-reach affordances. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:1110–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regia-Corte T, Wagman JB (2008) Perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface depends on height of center of mass. Exp Brain Res 191:25–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuckler MA (1996) Development of visually guided locomotion: barrier crossing by toddlers. Ecol Psychol 8:209–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp-Childs W, Bingham GP (2009) The affordance of barrier crossing in young children exhibits dynamic, not geometric, similarity. Exp Brain Res 198:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanucci JK, Geuss MN (2010) Duck! Scaling the height of a horizontal barrier to body height. Atten Percept Psychophy 72:1338–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Yang C, Bardy BG (2005) Affordance judgments and nonlocomotor body movement. Ecol Psychol 17:75–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Yang C, Giveans MR, Flanagan M, Bardy BG (2009) Movement in the perception of an affordance for wheelchair locomotion. Ecol Psychol 21:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH (1984) Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:683–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH, Whang S (1987) Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:371–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA (2011) Influences of head and torso movement before and during affordance perception. J Mot Behav 43:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart R, Ledebt A, Fong BF, de Vries H, Savelsbergh GJP (2005) The affordance of gap crossing in toddlers. Infant Behav Dev 28:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported by Award Number R37HD033486 from the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. We thank Danielle Bendicksen for her help in designing procedures, running participants, and coding data. We thank Gregory Murphy and John Franchak for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E. Adolph.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, W.G., Chan, G.L.Y., Vereijken, B. et al. Perceiving affordances for different motor skills. Exp Brain Res 225, 309–319 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3328-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3328-9

Keywords

Navigation