Skip to main content
Log in

Novel methodology for the study of mercury methylation and reduction in sediments and water using 197Hg radiotracer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercury tracers are powerful tools that can be used to study mercury transformations in environmental systems, particularly mercury methylation, demethylation and reduction in sediments and water. However, mercury transformation studies using tracers can be subject to error, especially when used to assess methylation potential. The organic mercury extracted can be as low as 0.01% of the endogenous labeled mercury, and artefacts and contamination present during methylmercury (MeHg) extraction processes can cause interference. Solvent extraction methods based on the use of either KBr/H2SO4 or HCl were evaluated in freshwater sediments using 197Hg radiotracer. Values obtained for the 197Hg tracer in the organic phase were up to 25-fold higher when HCl was used, which is due to the coextraction of 197Hg2+ into the organic phase during MeHg extraction. Evaluations of the production of MeHg gave similar results with both MeHg extraction procedures, but due to the higher Hg2+ contamination of the controls, the uncertainty in the determination was higher when HCl was used. The Hg2+ contamination of controls in the HCl extraction method showed a nonlinear correlation with the humic acid content of sediment pore water. Therefore, use of the KBr/H2SO4 method is recommended, since it is free from these interferences. 197Hg radiotracer (T 1/2 = 2.673 d) has a production rate that is about 50 times higher than that of 203Hg (T 1/2 = 46.595 d), the most frequently used mercury radiotracer. Hence it is possible to obtain a similar level of performance to 203Hg when it is used it in short-term experiments and produced by the irradiation of 196Hg with thermal neutrons, using mercury targets with the natural isotopic composition. However, if the 0.15% natural abundance of the 196Hg isotope is increased, the specific activity of the 197Hg tracer can be significantly improved. In the present work, 197Hg tracer was produced from mercury 51.58% enriched in the 196Hg isotope, and a 340-fold increase in specific activity with respect to natural mercury targets was obtained. When this high specific activity tracer is employed, mercury methylation and reduction experiments with minimum mercury additions are feasible. Tracer recovery in methylation experiments (associated with Me197Hg production from 197Hg2+ spike, but also with Hg2+ contamination and Me197Hg artefacts) with marine sediments was about 0.005% g−1 WS (WS: wet sediment) after 20 h incubation with mercury additions of 0.05 ng g−1 WS, which is far below natural mercury levels. In this case, the amount of Hg2+ reduced to Hg0 (expressed as the percent 197Hg0 recovered with respect to the 197Hg2+ added) varied from 0.13 to 1.6% g−1 WS. Me197Hg production from 197Hg2+ spike after 20 h of incubation of freshwater sediment ranged from 0.02 to 0.13% g−1 WS with mercury additions of 2.5 ng g−1 WS, which is also far below natural levels. 197Hg0 recoveries were low, 0.0058 ± 0.0013% g−1 WS, but showed good reproducibility in five replicates. Me197Hg production from 197Hg2+ spiked in freshwater samples ranged from 0.1 to 0.3% over a period of three days with mercury additions of 10 ng L−1. A detection limit of 0.05% for Me197Hg production from 197Hg2+ spike was obtained in seawater in a 25 h incubation experiment with mercury additions of 12 ng L−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilmour CC, Henry EA, Mitchell R (1992) Environ Sci Technol 26:2281–2287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mauro JBN, Guimaraes JRD, Hintelmann H, Watras CJ, Haack EA, Coelho-Souza SA (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:983–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marvin-DiPasquale MC, Agee J, Bouse RM, Jaffe BE (2003) Environ Geol 43:260–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardfeldt K, Munthe J, Stromberg D, Lindqvist O (2003) Sci Total Environ 304:127–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siciliano SD, O’Driscoll NJ, Tordon R, Hill J, Beauchamp S, Lean DRS (2005) Environ Sci Technol 39:1071–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Furutani A, Rudd JW (1980) Appl Environ Microbiol 40(4):770–776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimaraes JRD, Malm O, Pfeiffer C (1995) Sci Total Environ 175:151–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stordal MC, Gill GA (1995) Water Air Soil Pollut 80:725–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Summers AO, Silvers S (1978) Ann Rev Microbiol 332:637–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Toribara TY (1985) Int J Appl Radiat Is 36:903–904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilmour CC, Riedel GS (1995) Water Air Soil Pollut 80:747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Czuba M, Akagi H, Mortimer DC (1981) Environ Pollut Ser B 2:345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jereb V, Horvat M, Drobne D, Pihlar B (2003) Sci Tot Environ 304:269–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oremland RS, Culbertson CW, Winfrey MR (1991) Appl Environ Microbiol 57(1):130–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hines M, Horvat M, Faganeli J, Bonzongo J-C, Barkey T, Major EB, Scott KJ, Bailey EA, Warwick JJ, Lyons WB (2000) Environ Res 83:129–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuli KJ (2005) Nuclear wallet cards. National Brookhaven Laboratory, Upton, NY

  17. Pérez Catán S, Ribeiro Guevara S, Marvin-DiPasquale M, Arribére M, Cohen IM (2004) Mater Geoenviron 51:910–914

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ribeiro Guevara S, Arribére M, Jereb V, Pérez Catán S, Horvat M (2004) Mater Geoenviron 51:1928–1931

    Google Scholar 

  19. Melamed R, Trigueiro FE, Villas Boas RC (2000) Appl Organomet Chem 14:473–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rocha JC, Sargentini E, Zara LF, Rosa AH, dos Santos A, Burba P (2000) Talanta 53:551–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sjoblom A, Meili M, Sundbom M (2000) Sci Total Environ 261:115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Isoflex USA (2005) Certificate of analysis I-ICZ-01/04/050110-10. Isoflex USA, San Francisco, CA

  23. Firestone RB, Shirley V (1996) Table of isotopes. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kosta L, Byrne AR (1969) Talanta 16:1297–1303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Horvat M, Liang L, Bloom NS (1993) Anal Chim Acta 282(1):153–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Horvat M, Liang L, Bloom NS (1993) Anal Chim Acta 281(1):135–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang L, Horvat M, Bloom NS (1994) Talanta 41(3):371–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hintelman H (1999) Chemosphere 39:1093–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weast RC (ed)(1980) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 60th edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bowles KC, Apte SC (1998) Anal Chem 70:395–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Morris DP, Zagarese H, Williamson CE, Balseiro EG, Hargreaves BR, Modenutti B, Moeller R, Queimalinos C (1995) Limnol Oceanogr 40:1381–1391

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guimaraes JRD, Meili M, Malm O, de Souza Brito EM (1998) Sci Total Environ 213:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cossa D, Coquery M, Gobeil C, Martin M (1996) Mercury fluxes at the ocean margins. In: Baeyens W, Ebinghaus R, Vasiliev O (eds) Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances (NATO ASI Series 2. Environment Vol. 2). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leermakers M, Meuleman C, Baeyens W (1996) Mercury distribution and fluxes in Lake Baikal. In: Baeyens W, Ebinghaus R, Vasiliev O (eds) Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances (NATO ASI Series 2. Environment Vol. 2). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baeyens W, Leermakers M (1996) Particulate, dissolved and methylmercury budgets for the Scheldt estuary (Belgium and the Netherlands). In: Baeyens W, Ebinghaus R, Vasiliev O (eds) Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances (NATO ASI Series 2. Environment Vol. 2). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fostier AH, Forti MC, Guimaraes JRD, Melfi AJ, Boulet R, Espirito Santo CM, Krug FJ (2000) Sci Total Environ 260:201–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mughabghab SF, Divadeenam M, Holden NE (1981) Neutron cross-sections, vols. 1, 2. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted under the program funded by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology (MVSZT) of the R Slovenia (P1-0143), and project PICT 13-13276, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología, Argentina. The results are directly related to the bilateral cooperation between the Jožef Stefan Institute and Centro Atómico Bariloche, under the bilateral agreement between the MVSZT, Slovenia, and SECyT, Argentina. The authors thank Dr. Mark Marvin DiPasqualle for suggesting the study of the influence of humic acid on the seasonal variation in MeHg recoveries of control samples in Lake Escondido, and for supplying the humic acid material for the experiment. Acknowledgement is also due to Dr. A.R. Byrne and Dr. Chai Zhifang for suggesting the use of enriched 196Hg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Ribeiro Guevara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ribeiro Guevara, S., Žižek, S., Repinc, U. et al. Novel methodology for the study of mercury methylation and reduction in sediments and water using 197Hg radiotracer. Anal Bioanal Chem 387, 2185–2197 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1040-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1040-y

Keywords

Navigation