Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-term outcomes of Altis® single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective single-center study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Data on Altis® (Coloplast), a new adjustable single-incision sling (SIS) procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and complication rates of this procedure.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, a total of 52 women with SUI were implanted with an Altis® sling in an ambulatory setting. Before and after intervention (3, 6, and 12 months), women completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF). In addition, patients underwent a cough stress test at each evaluation and a post-voiding residual urine volume estimation at 3 months. The main outcomes measured were subjective cure (ICIQ-SF = 0), subjective improvement (ICIQ-SF >0 and < preoperative ICIQ-SF), and objective cure (negative cough stress test and no pad usage) rates. De novo overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, changes in voiding habits and adverse events were also analyzed.

Results

The subjective cure rate at 12 months was 84.0 %, with an additional improvement rate of 8.0 %. The objective cure rate was 90.2 %. Later postoperative complications included 1 case of vaginal extrusion (requiring surgical removal of the eroded mesh segment), 3 cases of vaginal exposure of the adjustment thread (managed conservatively), de novo urgency in 3 patients, and mild dyspareunia in 2 patients.

Conclusions

The Altis® sling is a safe and effective SIS procedure for the treatment of SUI with a short-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norton P, Brubaker L (2006) Urinary Incontinence in women. Lancet 367(9504):57–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93(3):324–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19(8):1043–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore RD, Serels SR, Davila GW, Settle P (2009) Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): a review including TVT, TOT, and mini-sling. Surg Technol Int 18:157–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornu JL, Sèbe P, Peyrat L, Ciofu C, Cussenot O, Haab F (2010) Midterm prospective evaluation of TVT-Secur reveals high failure rate. Eur Urol 58(1):156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Ambrogi V, Pifarotti P, Ricci L, Spreafico L (2009) TVT-Secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. one year data from a multi-centre prospective trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):313–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Debodinance P, Lagrange E, Amblard J et al (2008) TVT Secur: more and more minimally invasive. Preliminary prospective study of 110 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 37(3):229–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Baccichet R et al (2011) Short-term outcomes with the Ajust system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 22(2):177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel-Fattah M, Agur W, Abdel-All M et al (2011) Prospective multi-centre study of adjustable single-incision mini-sling (Ajust) in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women: 1-year follow-up study. BJU Int 109(6):880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornu JN, Peyrat L, Skurnik A, Ciofu C, Lucente VR, Haab F (2012) Ajust single incision transobturator sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: results after 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 23:1265–1270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mostafa A, Agur W, Abdel-All M et al (2012) A multicentre prospective randomised study of single-incision mini-sling (Ajust®) versus tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-OTM) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: pain profile and short-term outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165(1):115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mostafa A, Agur W, Abdel-All M et al (2013) Multicenter prospective randomized study of single-incision mini-slings vs. tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in management of female stress urinary incontinence: a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Urology 82(3):552–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dias J, Freitas R, Amorim R, Xambre L, Costa L, Ferraz L (2013) Altis® single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: short term outcomes from a single centre. Eur Urol Suppl 12:e895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamanini J, Dambros M, D’Ancona C, Palma P, Netto N Jr (2004) Validation of the “International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form” (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese. Rev Saude Publica 38(3):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22:3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gauruder-Burmester A, Popken G (2009) The MiniArc Sling System in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Braz J Urol 35(3):334–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2009) Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int 18:175–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moalli PA, Papas N, Menefee S, Albo M, Meyn L, Abramowitch SD (2008) Tensile properties of five commonly used mid-urethral slings relative to the TVT. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(5):655–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rezapour M, Novara G, Meier PA, Holste J, Landgrebe S, Artibani W (2007) A 3-month preclinical trial to assess the performance of a new TVT-like mesh (TVTx) in a sheep model. Int Urogynecol J 18(2):183–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Basu M, Duckett J (2010) A randomised trial of retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 117(6):730–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy M, Culligan PJ, Arce CM et al (2005) Is the cough test necessary when placing the tension-free vaginal tape? Obstet Gynecol 105(2):319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koops SE, Bisseling TM, van Brummen HJ, Heintz AP, Vervest HA (2006) What determines a successful tension free vaginal tape? A prospective multicentre cohort study: results from the Netherlands TVT database. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(1):65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmgren C, Nilsson S, Lanner L, Hellberg D (2005) Long-term results with tension-free vaginal tape on mixed and stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 106(1):38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Long CY, Hsu CS, Wu MP, Liu CM, Wang TN, Tsai EM (2009) Comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21(4):342–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P et al (2011) Single-incision sling system as primary treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: prospective 12 months data from a single institution. BJU Int 108(10):1616–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ulmsten U, Flaconer C, Johnson P et al (1998) A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9(4):210–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Waltregny D, de Leval J (2009) The TVT-obturator surgical procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a clinical update. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):337–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennelly MJ, Moore RD, Nguyen JN, Lukban J, Siegel S (2012) Miniarc single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 23(9):1285–1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Fattah M, Mustafa A, Familusi A, Ramsay I, N’dow J (2012) Prospective randomized controlled trial of transobturator tapes in management of urodynamic stress incontinence in women: 3-year outcomes from the Evaluation of Transobturator Tapes study. Eur Urol 62(5):843–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Conflicts of interest

None.

Contribution to the manuscript

J. Dias: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing.

L. Xambre: project development, data management, manuscript editing.

L. Costa: manuscript editing.

P. Costa: data collection.

L. Ferraz: manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Dias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dias, J., Xambre, L., Costa, L. et al. Short-term outcomes of Altis® single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective single-center study. Int Urogynecol J 25, 1089–1095 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2355-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2355-4

Keywords

Navigation