Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the minimally invasive Ajust™ system in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Methods

This was a prospective multicentre study. All patients with primary urodynamic stress urinary incontinence were prospectively selected to receive the Ajust™ procedure. The International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form (ICI-SF), Women Irritative Prostate Symptoms Score (W-IPSS), PGI-S, and PGI-I questionnaires were used to evaluate the impact of incontinence and voiding dysfunction on QoL and to measure patient's perception of incontinence severity and improvement.

Results

From January 2009 to October 2009, 111 consecutive subjects were enrolled in the study. At 6 months, 102 were available for outcomes analysis. The subjective and objective cure rates were 85.7% and 91.4%, respectively. The ICI-SF and W-IPSS questionnaires showed a statistical significant improvement in symptom scores.

Conclusions

In the short-term follow-up, the Ajust™ system was effective in restoring continence in more than 85% of subjects with a highly significant improvement in QoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

QoL:

Quality of life

SIS:

Single incision sling

MUCP:

Maximum urethral closure pressure

References

  1. Moore RD, Serels SR, Davila GW, Settle P (2009) Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): a review including TVT, TOT, and mini sling. Surg Technol Int 18:157–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D, Van der Aa F (2010) Single incision mini-sling versus transobturator sling: a compatrative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings. Int Urogynecol J 21:773–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Preclinical study: a rabbit model to evaluate Ajust™ adjustable single incision sling components-12 weeks data. 2009 C.R. Bard, Inc, http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf9/K092607.pdf

  4. Tubaro A, Zattoni F, Prezioso D, Scarpa RM, Pesce F, Rizzi CA et al (2006) Italian validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires. BJU Int 97:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yalcin I, Bump R (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tubaro A, Prezioso D, Zattoni F, Artibani W, Pesce F, Scarpa RM, Simoni L [2003] The flow study: validation of four questionnaires on symptoms and quality of life in Italian women with LUTS. In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society, 33rd Annual Meeting, Florence, Italy, 5–9 October 2003

  7. Breivik EK, Bjornsson G, Skovlund E (2000) A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 16:22–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Novara G, Galfano A, Boscolo-Berto R, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Ficarra V, Artibani W (2008) Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol 53:288–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyles S, Edwards R, Gregory W, Clark A (2007) Complications associated with trans-obturator sling procedures. Int Urogynecol J 18:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Neuman M (2008) Perioperative complications and early follow-up with 100 TVT- secur procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezapour M, Novara G, Meier PA, Holste J, Landgrebe S, Artibani W (2007) A 3-month preclinical trial to assess the performance of a new TVT-like mesh (TVTx) in a sheep model. Int Urogynecol J 18:183–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Ambrogi V, Pifarotti P, Ricci L, Spreafico L (2009) TVT secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. One year data from a multicentre prospective trial. Int Urogynecol J 20:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Basu M, Duckett J (2010) A randomised trial of retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence. BJOG 117:730–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schraffordt Koops SE, Bisseling TM, vanBrummen HJ, Heintz PM, Vervest HAM (2006) What determines a successful tension-free vaginal tape? A prospective multicenter cohort study: results from the Netherlands TVT database. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim YN, Dwyer P, Muller R, Rosamilla A, Lee J, Kobi S (2010) Do the Advantage slings work as well as the tension-free vaginal tapes? Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1157-6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:1043–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnson P, Jomaa M, Lanner L, Nilsson CG et al (1998) A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 9:210–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Waltregny D, de Leval J (2009) The TVT-obturator surgical procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a clinical update. Int Urogynecol J 20:337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Meschia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meschia, M., Barbacini, P., Baccichet, R. et al. Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 22, 177–182 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1254-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1254-6

Keywords

Navigation