Abstract
We set out to determine the incidence of symptomatic postpartum urinary retention (PUR) after vaginal delivery and to establish any associated risk factors. We carried out a retrospective case-control study of women having PUR after vaginal delivery from 2001 to 2005. Four controls, matched for date of delivery, were selected for each case in univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses. There were 15,757 deliveries and 30 cases of PUR (incidence 0.2%). Median duration of PUR was 19 days (range 3–85). Eighty percent were managed with intermittent self-catheterization. The use of regional analgesia increased the risk of PUR [odds ratio (OR) 6.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01–19.96], while ethnicity (Caucasian vs Asian) reduced the risk (OR 0.27, CI 0.08–0.85) (p<0.05). PUR is uncommon but carries significant morbidity. Epidural analgesia and Asian ethnic origin increase the risk. We recommend routine catheterization for up to 24 h after delivery after epidural analgesia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Groutz A, Gordon D, Wolman I, Jaffa A, Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB (2001) Persistent postpartum urinary retention in contemporary obstetric practice. J Reprod Med 46:44–48
Lee SN, Lee CP, Tang OS, Wong WM (1999) Postpartum urinary retention. Int J Gynecol Obstet 66:287–288
Yip SK, Brieger G, Hin LY, Chung T (1997) Urinary retention in the post-partum period. The relationship between obstetric factors and the post-partum post-void residual bladder volume. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:667–672
Yip SK, Sahota D, Pang MW, Day L (2005) Postpartum urinary retention. Obstet Gynecol 106:602–606
Yip SK, Sahota D, Pang MW, Chang A (2004) Postpartum urinary retention. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:881–891
Shah JPR, Dasgupta P (2000) Voiding difficulties and retention. In: Stanton SL, Monga AK (eds) Clinical urogynaecology, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 259–272
Jewell NP (2003) Statistics for epidemiology. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, USA
Collett D (2002) Modelling binary data, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, USA
StataCorp (2004) Stata statistical software: release 8.2. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX
Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, vol. II—the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Scientific Publications, no. 82
Ching-Chung L, Shuenn-Dhy C, Ling-Hong T, Ching-Chang H, Chao-Lun C, Po-Jen C (2002) Postpartum urinary retention. Assessment of contributing factors and long-term clinical impact. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:365–368
Carley ME, Carley JM, Vasdev G, Lesnick TG, Webb MJ, Ramin KD, Lee RA (2002) Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:430–433
Zaki M, Pandit M, Jackson S (2004) National survey for intrapartum and postpartum bladder care: assessing the need for guidelines. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111:874–876
Weil A, Reyes H, Rottenberg RD, Beguin F, Herrman WL (1983) Effect of lumbar epidural analgesia on lower urinary tract function in the immediate postpartum period. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:428–432
Kermans G, Wyndaele JJ, Thiery M, De Sy W (1986) Puerperal urinary retention. Acta Urol Belg 54:376–385
Oloffson CI, Ekblom AO, Ekman-Ordeberg GE, Irestedt LE (1997) Postpartum urinary retention: a comparison between two methods of epidural analgesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 71:31–34
Teo R, Yisa S, Mayne C, Tincello D (2005) A comparison of urodynamic diagnoses and detrusor muscle function in White and South Indian Asian women. J Urol 174:184–186
RCOG Study Group (2002) Incontinence in women. RCOG Study Group recommendation, vol. 6. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology, p 4 (June)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teo, R., Punter, J., Abrams, K. et al. Clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery: a retrospective case-control study. Int Urogynecol J 18, 521–524 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0183-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0183-x