Abstract
In this paper, we develop a composite quantile regression estimator of linear error-in-variable models based on instrumental variables. The proposed estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal under fairly general assumptions. It neither requires the measurement errors and the regression errors to have the same variance nor to belong to the same location-scale symmetric distribution. The simulation results show that the proposed method generates unbiased and efficient estimates for different types of the distributions of the regression errors in finite samples. An application to real data collected from the survey of identical twins to study the economic returns to schooling is also provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abarin T, Wang L (2012) Instrumental variable approach to covariate measurement error in generalized linear models. Ann Inst Statist Math 64(3):475–493
Angrist JD, Krueger A (1991) Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Q J Econ 106:979–1014
Ashenfelter O, Krueger A (1994) Estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins. Am Econ Rev 84(5):1157–1173
Cai Z, Das M, Xiong H, Wu X (2006) Functional coeffcient instrumental variables models. J Econ 133:207–241
Cui H (1997) Asymptotic normality of M-estimates in the EV model. Syst Sci Math Sci 10(3):225–236
Cui H, Li R (1998) On parameter estimation for semi-linear errors-in-variables models. J Multivar Anal 64:1–24
Feng S, Xue L (2014) Bias-corrected statistical inference for partially linear varying coefficient errors-in-variables models with restricted condition. Ann Inst Stat Math 66(1):121–140
Fuller WA (1987) Measurement Error Models. Wiley, New York
Guan J, Wang L (2017) Instrumental variable estimation in linear quantile regression models with measurement error. Chin J Appl Probab Stat 33(5):475–486
Guo J, Tian M, Zhu K (2012) New efficient and robust estimation in varying-coefficient models with heteroscedasticity. Stat Sin 22:1075–1101
He X, Liang H (2000) Quantile regression estimates for a class of linear and partially linear error-in-variable models. Stat Sin 10:129–140
Huang Y, Wang C (2001) Consistent functional methods for logistic regression with errors in covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1469–1482
Jiang R (2015) Composite quantile regression for linear errors-in-variables models. Hacet J Math Stat 44:707–713
Jiang R, Yang X, Qian W (2012) Random weighting M-estimation for linear errors-in-variables models. J Korean Stat Soc 41:505–514
Jiang R, Zhou Z, Qian W, Chen Y (2013) Two step composite quantile regression for single-index models. Comput Stat Data Anal 64:180–191
Kai B, Li R, Zou H (2010) Local composite quantile regression smoothing:an efficient and safe alternative to local polynomial regression. J R Stat Soc B (Stat Methodol) 72:49–69
Kai B, Li R, Zou H (2011) New efficient estimation and variable selection methods for semiparametric varying-coefficient partially linear models. Ann Stat 39:305–332
Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50
Knight K (1998) Limiting distributions for L1 regression estimators under general conditions. Ann Stat 26:755–770
Liang H, Wang N (1997) Large sample theory in a semiparametric partially linear errors-in-variable model. Stat Sin 15:99–117
Ma Y, Tsiatis AA (2006) Closed form semiparametric estimators for measurement error models. Stat Sin 16:183–193
Rouse CE (1999) Further estimates of the economic return to schooling from a new sample of twins. Econ Educ Rev 18:149–157
Schennach SM (2007) Instrumental variable estimation of nonlinear errors-in-variables models. Econometrica 75(1):201–239
Stefanski LA, Carroll RJ (1987) Conditional scores and optimal scores for generalized linear measurement-error models. Biometrika 74:703–716
Tang L, Zhou Z, Wu C (2012a) Weighting composite quantile estimate and variable selection method for censored regression model. Stat Probab Lett 3:653–663
Tang L, Zhou Z, Wu C (2012b) Efficient estimation and variable selection for infinite variance autoregressive models. J Appl Math Comput 40:399–413
Wei Y, Carroll RJ (2009) Quantile regression with measurement error. J Am Stat Assoc 104(487):1129–1143
Zhang W, Li G, Xue L (2011) Profile inference on partially linear varying-coefficient errors-in-variables models under restricted condition. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(11):3027–3040
Zhao P, Xue L (2010) Variable selection for semiparametric varying coefficient partially linear errors-in-variables models. J Multivar Anal 101(8):1872–1883
Zou H, Yuan M (2008) Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. Ann Stat 36(3):1108–1126
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Theory and Advanced Technology (cstc2017jcyjAX0067, cstc2018jcyjAX0823), Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJ1600610, KJ1706163), the Program for University Innovation Team of Chongqing (CXTDX201601026), Fifth batch of excellent talent support program for Chongqing Colleges and University and Chongqing key laboratory of social economy and applied statistics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled “Composite quantile regression estimation of linear error-in-variable models using instrumental variables”.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 1
Let \(Q_n=\sqrt{n}(\hat{\beta }^\mathrm{CQR}-\beta )\) and \(R_{nk}=\sqrt{n}(\hat{b}_{\tau _k}-b_{\tau _k})\). Then \((R_{n1}, \ldots , R_{nK}, Q_n)\) is the minimizer of the following criterion
where \(\epsilon _i^*=Y_i-(\Gamma Z_i)^T\beta =\epsilon _i+\delta _i^T\beta \) and \(r_i=(\hat{\Gamma }Z_i-\Gamma Z_i)^T\beta \).
By applying the identity in Knight (1998), we have
where \(B_n=\sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{K}\sum \nolimits _{i=1}^{n}\int _{r_i}^{r_i+\left\{ R_{n,k}+(\Gamma Z_i)^TQ_n\right\} /\sqrt{n}}\left[ I(\epsilon _i^*\le b_{\tau _k}+t)-I(\epsilon _i^*\le b_{\tau _k})\right] dt\).
First, we consider \(B_n\).
Define \(R_n=B_n-E(B_n|Z_i)\). It can be shown that \(R_n=o_p(1)\). Therefore, we have
where \(S_n=\frac{1}{n}\sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{K}\sum \nolimits _{i=1}^{n}f(b_{\tau _k})\Gamma Z_iZ_i^T\Gamma ^T\). It can been shown that \(S_n=E(S_n)+o_p(1)=\sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{K}f(b_{\tau _k})\Gamma \Sigma _{ZZ^T}\Gamma ^T=o_p(1)\).
Since \(\mathcal {L}_n\) is a convex function, we have
It is easy to obtain that
and
Then the proof of Theorem 1 is concluded by the Central Limit Theorem.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, W., Yang, Y. Composite quantile regression estimation of linear error-in-variable models using instrumental variables. Metrika 83, 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-019-00734-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-019-00734-5