Skip to main content
Log in

Properties of additive frailty model in survival analysis

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study a general additive frailty model along with some special cases and examples. The monotonicity of the population hazard is investigated in comparison to the baseline hazard rate. Examples are provided where the unconditional failure rate turns out to be increasing or bathtub shaped even when the baseline hazard is increasing. Association measure, for the additive case, of the correlated life times is studied with several examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen OO, Gjessing HK (2001) Understanding the shape of the hazard rate: a process point of view. Stat Sci 16:1–22

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti A, Caffo B, Ohman-Strickland P (2004) Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency and possible remedies. Compuat Stat Data Anal 47:639–653

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow RE, Proschan F (1975) Statistical theory of reliability: probability models. Hole, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow RE, Marshall AW, Proschan F (1963) Properties of probability distributions with monotone hazard rate. Ann Math Stat 34:375–389

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cha JH, Finkelstein (2014) Some notes on unobserved parameters (frailties) in reliability modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 123:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of family tendancy in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65:141–151

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davis HT, Feldstein ML (1979) The generalized Pareto law as a model for progessively censored survival data. Biometrika 66(2):299–306

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau L, Janssen P (2008) The frailty model. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RC, Gupta RD (2009) General frailty model and stochastic orderings. J Stat Plan Inference 139:3277–3287

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RC, Gupta RD (2010) Random effect survival models and stochastic comparisons. J Appl Probab 47:426–440

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RC, Kirmani SNUA (2006) Stochastic comparisons in frailty models. J Stat Plan Inference 136:3647–3658

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RC, Warren R (2001) Determination of change points of non-monotonic failure rates. Commun Stat Theory Methods 30(8, 9):1903–1920

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gurland J, Sethuraman J (1995) How pooling failure data may reverse increasing failure rate. J Am Stat Assoc 90:1416–1423

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanagal DD (2011) Modeling survival data using frailty models. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ, Singer B (1984) The identifibility of the proportional hazard model. Rev Econ Stud 51:231–241

  • Hjorth J (1980) A reliability distribution withn increasing, decreasing, constant and bathtub-shaped failure rates. Technometrics 22:99–108

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (1984) Lifetable methods for hetrogeneous populations: distributions describing the heterogeneity. Biometrika 71:75–83

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (1991) Modeling hetereogeneity in survival data. J Appl Probab 28:695–701

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (1995) Frailty models for survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 1:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley Interscience, New York

  • Kim J, Lee S (1998) Two sample goodness of fit test for additive risk models with censored observations. Biometrika 85:593–603

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JP, Moechberger ML, Li YH, Wang ST (1992) Estimating random effects in the Farmingham heart study. In: Klein JP, Goel P (eds) Survival analysis. State of the art. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 99–120

  • Lawless JF (2003) Statistical models and methods for life time data. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang KY, Self SG, Bandeen-Roche KJ, Zeger S (1995) Some recent developments for regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Lifetime Data Anal 1:403–416

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Oakes D, Ying Z (1998) Additive hazards regression with current status data. Biometrika 85:289–298

  • Lin DY, Ying Z (1994) Separametric analysis of the additive risk model. Biometrika 81:61–71

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JD (1999) On conditions for mixtures of increasing failure rate distributions to have increasing failure rate. Prob Eng Inf Sci 13:33–36

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn NL, Singpurwalla ND (1997) Comment: “Burn in” makes us feel good. Stat Science 12:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen T, Scheike TH (2002) Efficient estimation in additive hazards regression with current status data. Biometrika 89:649–658

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen T, Scheike TH, Zucker DM (2011) The Aalen additive gamma frailty hazards model. Biometrika 98(4):831–843

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee SP, Roy D (1998) Bivariate distributions through Cox’s regression model. In: Mukherjee SP, Basu SK, Sinha BK (eds) Frontiers in probability and statistics. Norosa Publishing Co, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair UN, Sankaran PG (2012) Some results on additive hazard model. Metrika 75:389–402

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1989) Bivariate survival models induced by fralities. J Am Stat Assoc 84:487–493

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prekopa A (1973) On logarithmic concave measures and functions. Acta Sci Math 33:335–343

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked M (1977) A family of concepts of dependence for bivariate distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 72:642–650

  • Silva GL, Amaral Turkman MA (2004) Bayesian analysis of an additive survival model with frailty. Commun Stat Theory Methods 33:2517–2533

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tomazella VL, Louzada-Neto F, Silva GL (2006) Bayesian modeling of recurrent events data with an additive gamma frailty distribution and a homogeneous Poisson process. J Stat Theory Appl 5(4):417–429

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Sttalard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16(3):439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wienke A (2010) Frailty models In survival analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin G, Ibrahim JG (2005) A class of Bayesian shared gamma frailty models with multivariate failure time data. Biometrics 61:208–216

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to the referee for some useful suggestions which enhanced the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramesh C. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, R.C. Properties of additive frailty model in survival analysis. Metrika 79, 1–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-015-0540-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-015-0540-1

Keywords

Navigation