Skip to main content
Log in

A dynamic stress–strength model with stochastically decreasing strength

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a dynamic stress–strength model under external shocks. The strength of the system decreases with time and the failure occurs when the strength finally vanishes. Furthermore, there is another cause of the system failure induced by an external shock process. Each shock is characterized by the corresponding stress. If the magnitude of the stress exceeds the current strength, then the system also fails. We assume that the initial strength of the system and its decreasing drift pattern are random. We derive the survival function of the system and interpret the time-dependent dynamic changes of the random quantities which govern the reliability performance of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow RE, Proschan F (1975) Statistical theory of reliability and life testing. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichelt FE, Fischer K (1980) General failure model applied to preventive maintenance policies. IEEE Trans Reliab 29:39–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block HW, Borges W, Savits TH (1985) Age-dependent minimal repair. J Appl Probab 22:370–386

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2009) On a terminating shock process with independent wear increments. J Appl Probab 46:353–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2011) On new classes of extreme shock models and some generalizations. J Appl Probab 48:258–270

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cha JH, Finkelstein M (2012) Information-based thinning of point processes and its application to shocks models. J Stat Plan Inference 142:2345–2350

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein M (2008) Failure rate modelling for reliability and risk. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein M, Cha JH (2013) Stochastic modeling for reliability: shocks, burn-in and heterogeneous population. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming TR, Harrington DP (1991) Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Anderson JJ (2013) Shaping human mortality patterns through intrinsic and extrinsic vitality processes. Demogr Res 28:342–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AW, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AW, Shaked M (1979) Multivariate shock models for distributions with increasing hazard rate average. Ann Probab 7:343–358

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Savits TH, Shaked M (1981) Shock models and the MIFRA property. Stat Process Appl 11:273–283

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mori Y, Ellingwood BR (1994) Maintaining: reliability of concrete structures. I: role of inspection/repair. J Struct Eng 120:824–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked M, Shanthikumar J (2007) Stochastic orders. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strehler BL, Mildvan AS (1960) General theory of mortality and aging. Science 132:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noortwijk JM, van der Weide JAM, Kallen MJ, Pandey MD (2007) Gamma processes and peaks-over-threshold distributions for time-dependent reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:1651–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noortwijk JM (2009) A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:2–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenocur ML (1989) A reliability model based on the gamma process and its analytic theory. Adv Appl Probab 21:899–918

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and the referee for very careful and helpful comments, which have improved and clarified the presentation of our paper. The work of the first author was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2011-0017338). The work of the first author was also supported by Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009-0093827). The work of the second author was supported by the NRF (National Research Foundation of South Africa) Grant FA2006040700002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Hwan Cha.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Substituting a random \(R\) instead of its realization \(r\) into (6) and applying the operation of conditional expectation,

$$\begin{aligned} \lambda _S(t)=\int _{0}^{\infty } {\bar{M}}(r)\lambda (t)g(r|T_S>t)dr=E[{\bar{M}}(R)|T_S>t]\lambda (t), \end{aligned}$$

where, as follows from

$$\begin{aligned} P(T_S \ge t, R>r)=\int _{r}^{\infty }\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(u)\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(u)du \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} P(R>r|T_S\ge t)=\frac{\int _{r}^{\infty }\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(u)\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(u)du}{\int _{0}^{\infty }\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(u)\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(u)du}. \end{aligned}$$

Thus the conditional density of strength is given by

$$\begin{aligned} g(r|T_S>t)=\frac{\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(r)\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(r)}{\int _{0}^{\infty }\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(u)\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(u)du}. \end{aligned}$$
(19)

Observe that, for \(t_1<t_2\),

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{g(r|T_S> t_1)}{g(r|T_S> t_2)}=\exp \{{\bar{M}}(r)\int _{t_1}^{t_2}\lambda (x)dx\}\frac{\int _{0}^{\infty }\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(u)\int _{0}^{t_2}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(u)du}{\int _{0}^{\infty }\exp \{-{\bar{M}}(u)\int _{0}^{t_1}\lambda (x)dx\}\cdot g(u)du}, \end{aligned}$$

which is decreasing in \(r\). Thus, \((R|T_S>t_1) \le _{fr} (R|T_S>t_2)\), which also implies \((R|T_S>t_1) \le _{st} (R|T_S>t_2)\). As \({\bar{M}}(r)\) is decreasing function of \(r\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} E[{\bar{M}}(R)|T_S>t_1]\ge E[{\bar{M}}(R)|T_S>t_2]. \end{aligned}$$

Thus \({\tilde{p}}(t)\) is decreasing.

Alternatively, obtaining the derivative of the function \({\tilde{p}}(t)\) defined in (8) with respect to \(t\), it is easy to see that

$$\begin{aligned} {\tilde{p}}'(t)&= \Big (-E[({\bar{M}}(R))^2|T_S>t]+(E[{\bar{M}}(R)|T_S>t])^2\Big )\lambda (t) \\&= -Var({\bar{M}}(R)|T_S>t)\lambda (t)<0, \end{aligned}$$

where expectation is with respect to the pdf (19).

Appendix 2 (Proof of Theorem 1)

The unconditional survival function can be obtained by taking expectation of the conditional survival function in (9) with respect to all random quantities in the conditional part. This procedure will be performed sequentially.

First, we take expectation of

$$\begin{aligned} P(T_S>t|N(s),0\le s\le t; S_1,S_2,\ldots , S_{N(t)};R=r,V=v) \end{aligned}$$

with respect to the conditional distribution of \((S_1,S_2,\ldots ,S_{N(t)}|N(s),0\le s\le t;R=r,V=v)\) to obtain \(P(T_S>t|N(s),0\le s\le t;R=r,V=v)\). However, due to independence assumption,

$$\begin{aligned} (S_1,S_2,\ldots ,S_{N(t)}|N(s),0\le s\le t;R=r,V=v)=_d (S_1,S_2,\ldots ,S_{N(t)}) \end{aligned}$$

and thus,

$$\begin{aligned}&P(T_S>t|N(s),0\le s\le t;R=r,V=v)\\&\quad =I(r-vt>0)\prod \limits _{i=1}^{N(t)}M(r-vT_i). \end{aligned}$$

Again, due to the independence assumption, \(P(T_S>t|R=r,V=v)\) can be obtained by taking expectation of \(P(T_S>t|N(s),0\le s\le t;R=r,V=v)\) with respect to the shock process \(\{N(s),0\le s \le t\}=\{T_1,T_2,\ldots ,T_{N(t)}, N(t)\}\):

$$\begin{aligned} P(T_S>t|R=r,V=v)&= E\Big [I(r-vt>0)\prod \limits _{i=1}^{N(t)}M(r-vT_i)\Big ] \nonumber \\&= E\Big [E\Big [I(r\!-\!vt>0)\prod \limits _{i=1}^{N(t)}M(r\!-\!vT_i)\Big |N(t)\Big ]\Big ].\quad \end{aligned}$$
(20)

It is well known that the joint distribution of \(T_1,T_2,\ldots ,T_n\) given \(N(t)=n\) is the same as the joint distribution of order statistics \(T_{(1)}'\le T_{(2)}'\le \cdots \le T_{(n)}'\) of i.i.d. random variables \(T_1',T_2',\ldots ,T_{n}'\), where the pdf of the common distribution of \(T_j'\)’s is given by \(\lambda (x)/\varLambda (t)\), \(0 \le x \le t\), \(\varLambda (t)\equiv \int _{0}^{t}\lambda (u)du\). Therefore, it can be easily verified that

$$\begin{aligned}&E\Big [I(r-vt>0)\prod \limits _{i=1}^{N(t)}M(r-vT_i)\Big |N(t)=n\Big ]\nonumber \\&\quad =I(r-vt>0)\Big (E[M(r-vT_i')]\Big )^n \nonumber \\&\quad =I(r-vt>0)\Big ( \frac{1}{\varLambda (t)} \int _{0}^{t}M(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big )^n. \end{aligned}$$
(21)

From Eqs. (20) and (21),

$$\begin{aligned}&P(T_S>t|R=r,V=v)\nonumber \\&\quad =I(r-vt>0)\sum \limits _{n=0}^{\infty } \Big ( \frac{1}{\varLambda (t)} \int _{0}^{t}M(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big )^n \nonumber \\&\qquad \times \frac{ \Big (\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (u)du\Big )^n}{n!}\exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}\lambda (u)du\Big \}\nonumber \\&\quad =I(r-vt>0)\exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big \}. \end{aligned}$$
(22)

Finally, the unconditional survival function can be obtained by taking expectation of \(P(T_S>t|R=r,V=v)\) in (22) with respect to the joint distribution of \((R,V)\):

$$\begin{aligned} P(T_S>t)&= \int _{0}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{\infty } I(r-vt>0)\exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big \}h(v)g(r)dvdr\\&= \int _{0}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{r/t} \exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big \}h(v)g(r)dvdr. \end{aligned}$$

By applying Leibniz rule, the failure rate function of a system \(\lambda _S(t)\) is

$$\begin{aligned} \lambda _S(t)&= -\frac{P'(T_S>t)}{P(T_S>t)}=\frac{\int _{0}^{\infty } \frac{r}{t^2}\exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-\frac{r}{t}x)\lambda (x)dx \Big \}h(\frac{r}{t})g(r)dr}{\int _{0}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{r/t} \exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big \}h(v)g(r)dvdr} \\&+\,\frac{ \lambda (t) \int _{0}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{r/t}{\bar{M}}(r-vt)\exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big \}h(v)g(r)dvdr}{\int _{0}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{r/t} \exp \Big \{-\int _{0}^{t}{\bar{M}}(r-vx)\lambda (x)dx\Big \}h(v)g(r)dvdr}. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cha, J.H., Finkelstein, M. A dynamic stress–strength model with stochastically decreasing strength. Metrika 78, 807–827 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-015-0528-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-015-0528-x

Keywords

Navigation