Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of population proportion in randomized response sampling using weighted confidence interval construction

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of estimation for binomial proportions of sensitive attributes in the population of interest. Randomized response techniques are suggested for protecting the privacy of respondents and reducing the response bias while eliciting information on sensitive attributes. By applying the Wilson (J Am Stat Assoc 22:209–212, 1927) score approach for constructing confidence intervals, various probable point estimators and confidence interval estimators are suggested for the common structures of randomized response procedures. In addition, efficiency comparisons are carried out to study the performances of the proposed estimators for both the cases of direct response surveys and randomized response surveys. Circumstances under which each proposed estimators is better are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A, Coull BA (1998) Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52: 119–126

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arnab R, Dorffner G (2007) Randomized response techniques for complex survey designs. Stat Pap 48: 131–141

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Böhning D (1998) Confidence interval estimation of a rate and the choice of sample size. Stat Med 7: 865–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouza CN (2009) Ranked set sampling and randomized response procedures for estimating the mean of a sensitive quantitative character. Metrika 70: 267–277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casella G, Berger RL (1990) Statistical inference. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Mukerjee R (1988) Randomized response: theory and techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Pal S (2008) Estimating sensitive proportions from Warner’s randomized responses in alternative ways restricting to only distinct units sampled. Metrika 68: 147–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (1990) The accuracy of approximate intervals for the binomial parameter. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 514–518

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clopper CJ, Pearson ES (1934) The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26: 404–413

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Devore JL (1977) A note on the RR techniques. Commun Stat Theory Methods 6: 1525–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diana G, Perri PF (2009) Estimating a sensitive proportion through randomized response procedures based on auxiliary information. Stat Pap 50: 661–672

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg BG, Abul-Ela Abdel-Latif A, Simmons WR, Horvitz DG (1969) The unrelated question RR model: theoretical framework. J Am Stat Assoc 64: 520–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat AS, Sinha BK (1991) Design and inference in finite population sampling. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz DG, Shah BV, Simmons WR (1967) The unrelated question RR model. Proc ASA Soc Stat Sec 65–72

  • Huang KC (2008) Estimation for sensitive characteristics using optional randomized response technique. Qual Quant 42: 679–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang KC (2010) Unbiased estimators of mean, variance and sensitivity level for quantitative characteristics in finite population sampling. Metrika 71: 341–352

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JM, Elam ME (2007) A stratified unrelated question randomized response model. Stat Pap 48: 215–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe R (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17: 857–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier J, May WL (2006) Weighted confidence interval construction for binomial parameters. Stat Methods Med Res 15: 37–46

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S (2008) Unbiasedly estimating the total of a stigmatizing variable from a complex survey on permitting options for direct or randomized responses. Stat Pap 49: 157–164

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavarao D (1978) On an estimation problem in Warner’s randomized response technique. Biometrics 34: 87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Mangat NS (1996) Elements of survey sampling. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Soeken KL, Macready GB (1982) Respondents’ perceived protection when using randomized response. Psychol Bull 92: 487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu JW, Tian GL, Tang ML (2008) Two new models for survey sampling with sensitive characteristic: design and analysis. Metrika 67: 251–263

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Warner SL (1965) Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc 60: 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22: 209–212

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei-Pei Kuo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, HJ., Kuo, MP. Estimation of population proportion in randomized response sampling using weighted confidence interval construction. Metrika 75, 655–672 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-011-0346-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-011-0346-8

Keywords

Navigation