Abstract
The response from a factorial experiment carried out in a time sequence may be affected by uncontrollable variables that are highly correlated with the time in which they occur. In such a situation, one possibility is to randomize the run order of the experiment. Another possibility is to use a systematic run order that is robust against time trends. Since randomized run orders make the time trend part of the error, it can be hoped that systematic run orders will be more effective to identify truly active factors. In this paper, a simulation study is used to compare the performances of the randomized and the systematic run orders. The response from an experiment where we have observed a strong time trend is used to demonstrate the influence of a realistic time trend on the run orders under consideration. The performance of the run orders is then measured by taking the probabilities of false rejection and the probabilities of detection of active contrasts. Our results show that the randomized run order managed to keep the nominal level, while the systematic did not. Additionally, when there were active factors, then the systematic run orders did not achieve more power than did the randomized run order.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adekeye KS (2004) Experimental design for quality improvement in the presence of time-trends. Ph.D thesis, Universität Dortmund (http://eldorado.uni-dortmund.de:8080/FB5/ls2/forschung/2004/Adekeye)
Bailey RA, Cheng CS, Kipnis P (1992) Construction of trend-resistant factorial designs. Statistica Sinica 2:393–411
Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Cheng CS, Jacroux M (1988) The construction of trend-free run orders of two-level factorial designs. J Am Stat Assoc 83:1152–1158
Daniel C (1959) Use of half normal plots in interpreting factorial two level experiments. Technometrics 1:311–341
de León G, Grima P, Tort-Martorell X (2003) Experimental order in factorial design. Paper presented at the 3rd ENBIS-Conference in Barcelona, 21–22 August, 2003 (Abstract at: http://www.enbis.org/barcelonaconference/abstracts.html♯114)
Gunter B (1993) Through a tunnel slowly with ball bearing and insight to teach experimental design. The American Statistician 47: 265–268
Kunert J (1997) On the use of the factor-sparsity assumption to get an estimate of the variance in saturated designs. Technometrics 39:81–90
Pankratz A (1983) Forecasting with univariate Box-Jenkins models: concepts and cases. John Wiley, New York
Toutenburg H, Gössl R, Kunert J (1998) Quality engineering. Eine Einführung in Taguchi-Methoden. Prentice Hall, München
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adekeye, K.S., Kunert, J. On the Comparison of Run Orders of Unreplicated 2k–p Designs in the Presence of a Time Trend. Metrika 63, 257–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-005-0016-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-005-0016-9