Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting spatially dependent origin and destination commodity flows

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore origin–destination forecasting of commodity flows between 15 Spanish regions, using data covering the period from 1995 to 2004. The 1-year-ahead forecasts are based on a recently introduced spatial autoregressive variant of the traditional gravity model. Gravity (or spatial interaction models) attempt to explain variation in \(N = n^2\) flows between \(n\) origin and destination regions that reflect a vector arising from an \(n\) by \(n\) flow matrix. The spatial autoregressive variant of the gravity model used here takes into account spatial dependence between flows from regions neighboring both the origin and destinations during estimation and forecasting. One-year-ahead forecast accuracy of non-spatial and spatial models are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The external border or frontier effect has been studied by McCallum (1995), Helliwell (1996, 1998), Anderson and van Wincoop (2003), Okubo (2004), Gil et al. (2005), Nitsch (2000), Evans (2003) and Chen (2004).

  2. Helliwell (1996), Wolf (2000) and Combes et al. (2005) among others.

  3. We use the symbol \(\otimes \) to denote a Kronecker product.

  4. For the robust model \(A = (I_N - \rho W_c ) V^{1/2}\) and \(\Omega = \sigma ^2_{\varepsilon } (A^{\prime } V^{-1} A)^{-1}\), where \(V\) is a diagonal matrix containing the variance scalar estimates.

References

  • Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):17092

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen N (2004) Intra-national versus International Trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter? J Int Econ 63(1):93118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combes PP, Lafourcade M, Mayer T (2005) The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France. J Int Econ 66(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CL (2003) The economic significance of national border effects. Am Econ Rev 93(4):1291312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Griffith DA (2008) Modeling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data: an application to patent citation data in the European Union. J Reg Sci 48:969–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Scherngell T, Jansenberger E (2006) The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe evidence from a spatial interaction modelling perspective. Geogr Anal 38(3):288–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmendia A, Llano-Verduras C, Requena-Silventre F (2012) Network and the disappearance of the intranational home bias. Econ Lett 116:178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J (1993) Bayesian treatment of the independent student t linear model. J Appl Econom 8:19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P, Llano-Verduras C, Requena-Silventre F (2010) Competitiveness and interregional as well as and international trade: the case of Catalonia. Int J Ind Organ 28:415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil S, Llorca R, Martinez JA, Oliver J (2005) The border effect in Spain. World Econ 28:1617–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger A (1962) Best linear unbiased prediction in the linear model. J Am Stat Assoc 57:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (2007) Spatial structure and spatial interaction: 25 years later. Rev Reg Stud 37(1):28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA, Jones K (1980) Explorations into the relationship between spatial structure and spatial interaction. Environ Plan A 12(2):187201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimpe C, Patuelli R (2011) Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach. Ann Reg Sci 46:519–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell JF (1996) Do national borders matter for Quebecs trade? Can J Econ 29(3):50722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell JF (1998) How much do national borders matter? Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

  • Keith K, LeSage JP (2004) Robust decomposition analysis of wage differentials. J Econ Soc Meas 29(4):487–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Brown JP, Florax RJGM (2010) A two-step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: theory, small sample performance and an application. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40(4):241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP (1997) Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models. Int Reg Sci Rev 20(1/2):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Fischer MM (2010) Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 409–433

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Llano-Verduras C (2013) A spatial interaction model with spatial structured origin and destination effects. J Geogr Syst 15(3):265–289

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2004) Conditioning upon all the data: improved prediction via imputation. J Real Estate Finance Econ 29:233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2008) Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. J Reg Sci 48(5):941–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, New York

  • Llano-Verduras C, Esteban A, Pérez J, Pulido A (2010) Opening the interregional trade black box: the C-Intereg Database For The Spanish Economy (1995–2005). Int Reg Sci Rev 33(3):302–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llano-Verduras C, Minondo A, Requena-Silvente F (2011) Is the border effect an artefact of geographical aggregation? World Econ 34(10):1771–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum J (1995) National borders matter: Canadian-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns. Am Econ Rev 85(3):61523

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch V (2000) National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union. Can J Econ 33(4):1091–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo T (2004) The border effect in the Japanese Market: a gravity model analysis. Jpn Int Econ 18:111

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, LeSage JP (2008) Spatial econometric models, prediction. In: Shekhar Shashi, Xiong Hui (eds) Encyclopedia of geographical information science. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Requena F, Llano C (2010) The border effects in Spain: an industry level analysis. Empirica 37:455–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell R, Lata R (2013) Towards an integrated European Research Area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data. Pap Reg Sci 92(3):555–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Smith TE (1995) Gravity models of spatial interaction behavior. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefelsdorf M (2003) Misspecifications in interaction model distance decay relations: a spatial structure effect. J Geogr Syst 5:25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T (2001) On sampling the degree-of-freedom of Student’s-t disturbances. Stat Probab Lett 52:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf H (2000) Intra-national home bias in trade. Rev Econ Stat 82(4):555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. LeSage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LeSage, J.P., Llano-Verduras, C. Forecasting spatially dependent origin and destination commodity flows. Empir Econ 47, 1543–1562 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-013-0786-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-013-0786-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation