Skip to main content
Log in

Formability evaluation for low conductive sheet metal by novel specimen design in electromagnetic forming

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we report a new method to test the formability of low conductive metal sheet under electromagnetic forming using a single planar spiral coil. Proposed novel design of test articles can produce the biaxial tensile strain state, uniaxial tensile strain state, and plane strain state, respectively. The three strain states created by the novel specimen designs were then verified by simulations. Finally, the forming limits of Ti-6Al-4V sheet metal in three different stain states during electromagnetic forming were determined by corresponding experiments using the novel specimen designs. The results indicate that the new method is reasonable and reliable. Formability of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy experienced significant improvement when compared with that in quasi-static condition. The extent of improvement was greatest in the plane strain state, reaching 73.65 %. The proposed specimen designs can also be used to test the formability of sheet metal under quasi-static conditionse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang J, Goel A, Yang F, Gau J-T (2009) Blank optimization for sheet metal forming using multi-step finite element simulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(7–8):709–720. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1383-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan LC, Fu MW, Li N, Lu J (2010) FEA-aided design of multi-stage drawing process and tooling for production of a miniature sheet metal component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(9–12):993–1000. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2163-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daehn GS, Vohnout VJ, DuBois L (1999) Improved formability with electromagnetic forming: fundamentals and a practical example. Minerals, Metals and Materials Society/AIME, 184 Thorn Hill Road, Warrendale, PA 15086–7528, USA

  4. Seth M, Vohnout VJ, Daehn GS (2005) Formability of steel sheet in high velocity impact. J Mater Process Technol 168(3):390–400. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hecker SS (1974) Cup test for assessing stretchability. Met Eng Q 14(4):30–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka K (1963) Study on the formability of steel sheets. Yawata technical report 264:141–154

  7. Golovashchenko SF (2007) Material formability and coil design in electromagnetic forming. J Mater Eng Perform 16(3):314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li C, Liu D, Yu H, Ji Z (2009) Research on formability of 5052 aluminum alloy sheet in a quasi-static-dynamic tensile process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(2):117–124. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dariani BM, Liaghat GH, Gerdooei M (2009) Experimental investigation of sheet metal formability under various strain rates. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 223(6):703–712. doi:10.1243/09544054jem1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y-J, Lee R-S, Gau J-T (2012) Formability evaluation by novel specimen designs in sheet metal forming with two-step strain paths. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. doi:10.1177/0954405412468559

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee R, Cheng T, Luo F (2010) A novel formability test method for electro-magnetic forming of aluminum sheet. Steel Res Int 81(9):1042–1047

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rohatgi A, Soulami A, Stephens EV, Davies RW, Smith MT (2014) An investigation of enhanced formability in AA5182-O Al during high-rate free-forming at room-temperature: quantification of deformation history. J Mater Process Technol 214(3):722–732. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagoner RH, Wang N-M (1979) An experimental and analytical investigation of in-plane deformation of 2036-T4 aluminum sheet. Int J Mech Sci 21(5):255–264. doi:10.1016/0020-7403(79)90001-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li F, Mo J, Zhou H, Fang Y (2013) 3D Numerical simulation method of electromagnetic forming for low conductive metals with a driver. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(9–12):1575–1585. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4124-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kıranlı E (2009) Determination of material constitutive equation of a biomedical grade Ti6Al4V alloy for cross-wedge rolling. Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Li F-Q, Mo J-H, Li J-J, Huang L, Zhou H-Y (2013) Formability of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy sheet in magnetic pulse bulging. Mater Des 52:337–344. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fenqiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, F., Mo, J., Li, J. et al. Formability evaluation for low conductive sheet metal by novel specimen design in electromagnetic forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 1677–1685 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8893-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8893-9

Keywords

Navigation