Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How import integration changes firms’ decisions to innovate

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how Russian manufacturing firms pursue technology innovation in response to imports. The research is based on the data from two surveys of manufacturing companies performed in 2005 and 2009. The findings show beneficial effects of importing on innovation. Previous involvement in the importation of equipment and intermediates leads to future innovation, and there is evidence of simultaneous choice in favour of imports and innovation in case of manufacturing equipment. The learning effects from importing seem to be higher for product than for process innovation. The decisions of firms to invest in innovation and to import are sensitive to their location, technology position, pressure from import competition, and their efforts to conduct R&D in addition to importing embodied knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D (2003) Patterns of skill premia. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):199–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya RC, Keller W (2010) International trade, foreign direct investments, and technology spillovers. Chapter 19. In: Hall B, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation. Elsevier, North-Holland

  • Aghion Ph, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 20(2):701–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion Ph, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S (2004) Entry and productivity growth: evidence from microlevel panel data. J Eur Econ Assoc Pap Proc 2(2/3):265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiti M, Konings J (2007) Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. Am Econ Rev 97(5):1611–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristei D, Catellani D, Franco C (2013) Firms’ exporting and importing activities: is there a two-way relationship? Rev World Econ 149(1):55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: Henderson JV, Thriss JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2731–2739

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekes G, Harastozi P (2010) Agglomeration premium and trading activity of firms. Discussion papers MT-DP – 2010/1, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

  • Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, Scott PK (2007) Firms in international trade. J Econ Perspect 21(3):105–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertschek I (1995) Product and process innovation as a response to increasing imports and foreign direct investment. J Ind Econ 43(4):341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom N, Romer PM, Spephen J, Terry SJ, Van Reenen J (2013) A trapped-factors model of innovation. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 103(3):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein A, Cravino J, Vogel J (2013) Importing skill-biased technology. Am Econ J Macroecon 5(2):32–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos P (2011) Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinean firms. Am Econ Rev 101(1):304–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi Y-S, Hahn CH (2013) Effects of imported intermediate varieties in plant total factor productivity and product switching: evidence from Korean manufacturing. Asian Econ J 27(2):125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe DT, Helpman E (1995) International R&D spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 39(5):859–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colantone I, Crino R (2014) New imported inputs, new domestic products. J Int Econ 92(1):147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damijan J, Konings J, Polanec S (2014) Import churning and export performance of multi-product firms. World Econ 37(11):1483–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damijan J, Kostevc Č (2015) Learning from trade through innovation. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 77(3):408–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N, Topalova P (2011) Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: evidence from India. Q J Econ 125(4):1727–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnichenko Y, Svejnar J, Terrell K (2010) Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. Am Econ J Macroecon 2(2):194–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z, Hausman JA (1986) Errors in variables in panel data. J Econ 31(1):93–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan R (2002) The impact of imported and domestic technologies on the productivity of firms: panel data evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. J Dev Econ 69(1):23–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller W (2002) Trade and the transmission of technology. J Econ Growth 7(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kugler M, Verhoogen E (2009) Plants and imported inputs: new facts and an interpretation. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 99(2):501–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • lammarino S, McCann P (2013) Multinationals and economic geography: location, technology and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Ng T (2012) Do imports spur incremental innovation in the South? China Econ Rev 23(4):819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Batiz L, Romer P (1991) Economic integration and endogenous growth. Q J Econ 106(2):531–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Political Econ 98(5):71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith ShW (2014) Follow me to the innovation frontier? Leaders, laggards and the differential effects of imports and exports on technological innovation. J Int Bus Stud 45(3):248–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (2007) Quality, trade and the moving window: the globalization process. Econ J 117(524):469–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J (2012) International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Rev World Econ 148(2):235–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J-Y, Blomstrőm M (1992) Foreign investment and technology transfer: a simple model. Eur Econ Rev 36(1):137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple SR (2005) A simple model of firm heterogeneity, and wages. J Int Econ 65(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research University-Higher School of Economics under the Basic Research Program, and by the FP7 Collaborative SEARCH Research Project “Sharing Knowledge Assets: Interregionally Cohesive Neighbourhoods”. The authors are grateful to three anonymous reviewers, and to Ann Hartell, Edward Bergman, and participants of the 52nd European conference of the Regional Science Association for very helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ksenia Gonchar.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, and 8.

Table 6 Sample structure by sector and plant size, % of total respondents
Table 7 Definition of variables
Table 8 Pairwise correlations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonchar, K., Kuznetsov, B. How import integration changes firms’ decisions to innovate. Ann Reg Sci 60, 501–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0697-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0697-6

JEL Classification

Navigation