Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the impact of trails on residential property values in the presence of spatial dependence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impacts of a multi-purpose trail on residential property values in a hedonic model. Using a large housing data set in combination with street network distances, we show that proximity to trail entrances positively effects property values. Among other things, our study compares the hedonic model results from three different spatial specifications. We pay specific attention to the direct and indirect effects on residential property prices associated with potential changes in house characteristics. In addition, our study predicts property values around trail entrances using a ‘modified spatial predictive process’ approach that is well suited for capturing spatial dependence in large data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘Friends’ help out scenic Little Miami trail: Loveland—For supporters of the Little Miami Scenic Trail, their charge borders on a sacred trust, Cincinnati Enquirer August 21 2010. The 2 days of count were Wednesday, July 28 and Sunday, August 8 2010.

  2. Estimation results available on requests.

  3. Not to be confused with the assessed value used for property tax calculations which, in Ohio, is simply defined as 35 % of the true market value.

  4. Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation results are based on a simulated chain where the first 5,000 samples are discarded as a ‘burn-in’ period, followed by 15,000 iterations that were collected to produce posterior summaries for the parameters of interest.

  5. Since the spacing of the locations is relatively irregular, we could use a space-covering design (see Royle and Nychka 1998). To overcome this issue, we implement a larger numbers of knots making sure that results are robust to the selection of knots.

References

  • Anderson ST, West SE (2006) Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(6):773–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asabere P, Huffman F (2009) The relative impacts of trails and greenbelts on home prices. J Real Estate Finance Econ 38(4):408–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Gelfand AE, Finley AO, Sang H (2008) Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial datasets. J R Stat Soc Ser 70:825–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry BJL, Bednarz RS (1975) A hedonic model of prices and assessments for singlefamily homes: does the assessor follow the market or the market follow the assessor? Land Econ 51(1):21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasington David M (1999) Which measures of school quality does the housing market value? J Real Estate Res 18:395–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P, Sheppard S (1995) On the prices of land and the value of amenities. Economica 62(246):247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp JM, Nanda A, Ross SL (2008) Which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition on property values. J Urban Econ 63(2):451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotteleer G, van Kooten GC (2012) Expert opinion versus actual transaction evidence in the valuation of non-market amenities. Econ Model 29(1):32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley and Sons, New York

  • Finley AO, Sang H, Banerjee S, Gelfand AE (2009) Improving the performance of predictive process modeling for large datasets. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:2873–2884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand AE, Ecker MD, Knight JR, Sirmans CF (2004) The dynamics of location in home price. J Real Estate Finance Econ 29:149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess DB, Almeida TM (2007) Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Stud 44(5):1041–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel K, Zabel J (2001) Estimating the economic benefits of cleaning up Superfund sites: the case of Woburn, Massachusetts. J Real Estate Finance Econ 22(2–3):163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizek K (2006) Two approaches to valuing some of bicycle facilities’ presumed benefits: propose a session for the 2007 National Planning Conference in the City of Brotherly Love. J Am Plan Assoc 72(3): 309–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2):132–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2004) Models for spatially dependent missing data. J Real Estate Finance Econ 29(2):233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) An introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman Hall/CRC Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey G, Man J, Payton S, Dickson K (2004) Property values, recreation values, and urban greenways. J of Park Recreat Adm 22(3):69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AK, Rasmussen DW (2001) Measuring the impact of crime on house prices. Appl Econ 33(15):1981–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogush P, Krizek KJ, Levinson D (2005) The value of trail access on home purchases. Presented at 84th annual meeting of transportation research board in Washington, DC, 9–13 Jan 2005

  • Nicholls S, Crompton JL (2005) The impact of greenways on property values: evidence from Austin, Texas. J Leis Res 37(3):321–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls S, Crompton JL (2007) The impact of a golf course on residential property values. J Sport Manag 21(4):555–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1):34–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle JA, Nychka D (1998) An algorithm for the construction of spatial coverage designs with implementation in SPLUS. Comput Geosci 24:479–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B 64:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente J, Wu SS, Gelfand A, Sirmans CF (2005) Apartment rent prediction using spatial modeling. J Real Estate Res 27:105–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventolo WL, Williams MR (1994) Fundamentals of real estate appraisal. Real Estate Education Company, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Cincinnati for support of this research through an University Research Council (URC) Interdisciplinary Grant. We want to thank also David Brasington for providing us with data about school districts and tax rates, Thomas Wuerzer and Kat Haessler for their support with the ArcGis network analysis, and Andrea Yang for all of her editorial work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Parent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parent, O., vom Hofe, R. Understanding the impact of trails on residential property values in the presence of spatial dependence. Ann Reg Sci 51, 355–375 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0543-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0543-z

JEL Classification

Navigation