Abstract
An early age at first marriage is known to be associated with a high risk of divorce. Yet, it has been suggested that beyond a certain point, the relationship between age at marriage and marital instability may become positive because as unmarried women begin to hear their biological clock tick, they may settle for matches far from the optimal. Analyses based on cycles 5 and 6 of the National Surveys of Family Growth show that the relationship between age at marriage and marital instability is strongly negative up to the late 20s, with a flattening of the curve thereafter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Contrary to the prediction of Becker’s (1973) model, there is positive assortative mating by wages when other factors are held constant. Lam (1988) provides an explanation for this empirical regularity. He develops the idea that joint consumption of public goods, an important source of gains from marriage, generates a tendency for positive assortative mating by wages due to the returns from the spouses having similar demands for public goods.
Another interpretation that has been suggested for the effect of age is as a proxy for the length of search and the quality of the match (Weiss and Willis 1997). However, as the pattern of delayed marriage has unfolded over the past decades, the connection between age at marriage and the length of the dating process has weakened. Substantial anecdotal evidence suggests that couples entering marriage in the late 20s and 30s often first met as mature adults.
To minimize loss of information, imputations were used for missing data. Most imputations, including the dates of various events, were available in the public use data files, based on sophisticated imputation procedures. The few cases that had missing information on education were assigned the lowest education category; the modal category was used for other control variables. Dummy variables indicating imputations for the controls were included in preliminary runs; they were insignificant in all cases and dropped in the final models.
In the empirical analysis, union dissolution was defined as of the date of divorce for respondents whose first marriage had ended in divorce, and as of the date the spouses stopped living together for those who had been married only once and were separated at the time of the interview. Unions that were dissolved through widowhood were treated as censored at the time of the husband’s death.
The estimated fifth-year dissolution probability for the reference woman is lower in this specification because the regression now includes the husband’s and couple’s characteristics and the modal traits are generally associated with stabilizing forces (husband not married before, homogamy in all dimensions).
References
Amato PR (1996) Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. J Marriage Fam 58:628–640
Axinn WG, Thornton A (1992) The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: selectivity or causal influence? Demography 29:357–374
Becker G (1973) A theory of marriage. In: Schultz TW (ed) Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 299–344
Becker G (1991) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Becker G, Landes EM, Michael RT (1977) An economic analysis of marital instability. J Polit Econ 85(6):1141–1187
Bennett NG, Klimas Blanc A, Bloom DE (1988) Commitment and the modern union: assessing the link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability. Am Sociol Rev 53:127–138
Brown SL (1998) Cohabitation as marriage prelude versus marriage alternative: the significance of psychological well-being. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association
Bumpass LL, Castro-Martin T, Sweet J (1991) The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. J Fam Issues 12(1):22–42
Castro-Martin T, Bumpass LL (1989) Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography 26(1):37–52
Cherlin A (2004) The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. J Marriage Fam 66:848–861 (November)
Chiswick CU, Lehrer EL (1990) On marriage-specific capital: its role as a determinant of remarriage. J Popul Econ 3:193–213
Fitch CA, Ruggles S (2000) Historical trends in marriage formation: the United States 1850–1990. In: Waite L, Bachrach C, Hindin M, Thomson E, Thornton A (eds) The ties that bind: perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 59–90
Goldstein JR (1999) The leveling of divorce in the United States. Demography 36(3):409–414
Groves RM, Benson G, Mosher WD, Rosenbaum J, Granda P, Axinn W, Lepkowsk JMi, Chandra A (2005) “Plan and operation of the 2002 national survey of family growth”. Vital and health statistics, series 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyatsville, MD
Kalmijn M, de Graaf PM, Janssen JP (2005) Intermarriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands: the effects of differences in religion and in nationality, 1974–94. Popul Stud 59(1):71–85
Kelly JE, Mosher WD, Duffer AP, Kinsey SH (1997) Plan and operation of the 1995 national survey of family growth. Vital Health Stat 1(36):1–89
Lam D (1988) Marriage markets and assortative mating with household public goods: theoretical results and empirical implications. J Hum Resour 23(4):462–487
Lehrer EL (1988) Determinants of marital instability: a Cox-regression analysis. Appl Econ 20(2):195–210
Lehrer EL (1996) The determinants of marital stability: a comparative analysis of first and higher order marriages. In: Schultz TP (ed) Research in population economics 8. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 91–121
Lehrer EL (2003) The economics of divorce. In: Grossbard-Shechtman S (ed) Marriage and the economy: theory and evidence from industrialized societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–74
Lehrer EL (2004) Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Popul Dev Rev 30(4):707–726
Lehrer EL, Chiswick CU (1993) Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography 30(3):385–404
Lillard L, Brien MJ, Waite LJ (1995) Pre-marital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: is it self-selection? Demography 32(3):437–458
McLanahan S (2004) Diverging destinies: how children fare under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4):607–628
McLanahan S, Bumpass L (1988) Intergenerational consequences of family disruption. Am J Sociol 94:130–152
Oppenheimer VK (1988) A theory of marriage timing. Am J Sociol 94:563–591
Phillips JA, Sweeney MM (2005) Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among white, black, and Mexican American women. J Marriage Fam 67:296–314
Popenoe D, Dafoe Whitehead B (1999) Should we live together? What young adults need to know about cohabitation before marriage. The National Marriage Project. Available at http://www.smartmarriages.com/cohabit.html (last visited July 11, 2006)
Popenoe D, Dafoe Whitehead B (2004) The state of our unions 2004. The National Marriage Project. Available at http://marriage.rutgers.edu/Publications/SOOU/TEXTSOOU2004.htm (last visited July 11, 2006)
Raley RK, Bumpass L (2003) The topography of the divorce plateau: levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research 8(8), http://www.demographic-research.org.
Schoen R (1992) First unions and the stability of first marriages. J Marriage Fam 54:281–284
Teachman JD (2002) Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors. Demography 39:331–351
Teachman JD, Polonko KA (1993) Cohabitation and marital stability in the United States. Soc Forces 69:207–220
Thornton A, Axinn WG, Hill DH (1992) Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. Am J Sociol 98(3):628–651
Tzeng MS (1992) The effects of socioeconomic heterogamy and changes on marital dissolution for first marriages. J Marriage Fam 54(3):609–619
U.S. Census Bureau (2004) http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/tabsMS-2.pdf
Waite LJ (1995) Does marriage matter? Demography 32(4):483–507
Waite LJ, Lillard LA (1991) Children and marital disruption. Am J Sociol 96(4):930–953
Waite LJ, Lehrer EL (2003) The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: a comparative analysis. Popul Dev Rev 29(2):255–275
Weiss Y (1997) The formation and dissolution of families: why marry? Who marries whom? And what happens upon divorce? In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics, V 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 81–123
Weiss Y, Willis RJ (1997) Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution. J Labor Econ 15(1):S293–S329
White LK, Booth A (1985) The quality and stability of remarriages: the role of stepchildren. Am Sociol Rev 50:689–698
Acknowledgements
I received many helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper from Deborah Cobb-Clark, three anonymous referees, and participants in the session on Union Dissolution at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, March 30–April 1, 2006, Los Angeles. Zhenxiang Zhao provided skillful research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Deborah Cobb-Clark
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehrer, E.L. Age at marriage and marital instability: revisiting the Becker–Landes–Michael hypothesis. J Popul Econ 21, 463–484 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0092-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0092-9