Abstract
Modifications of DNA strands and nucleobases—both induced and accidental—are associated with unfavorable consequences including loss or gain in genetic information and mutations. Therefore, DNA repair proteins have essential roles in keeping genome fidelity. Recently, mounting evidence supports that 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), one of the most abundant genomic base modifications generated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, along with its cognate repair protein 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase1 (OGG1), has distinct roles in gene expression through transcription modulation or signal transduction. Binding to 8-oxoG located in gene regulatory regions, OGG1 acts as a transcription modulator, which can control transcription factor homing, induce allosteric transition of G-quadruplex structure, or recruit chromatin remodelers. In addition, post-repair complex formed between OGG1 and its repair product-free 8-oxoG increases the levels of active small GTPases and induces downstream signaling cascades to trigger gene expressions. The present review discusses how cells exploit damaged guanine base(s) and the authentic repair protein to orchestrate a profile of various transcriptomes in redox-regulated biological processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
DNA base damage (including deamination, oxidation, or alkylation) is repaired through base excision repair (BER) pathway, which is highly conserved in pro- and eukaryotes [1]. To date, BER is believed to be the simplest, thoroughly characterized process among all DNA repair pathways [2, 3]. BER is initiated by mono- or bi-functional DNA glycosylase(s). After base release, apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site processing, nucleotide incorporation, and nick sealing are successively carried out by AP endonuclease1 (APE1), DNA polymerase β, and DNA ligase in a “hand-off” model [2, 4, 5].
Among four DNA bases, guanine has the lowest oxidation potential [6, 7]; thus, its oxidation product 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is the most predominant oxidative damage and taken as a biomarker of oxidative stress [6,7,8,9]. 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase1 (OGG1), a functional analog of Escherichia coli protein MutM/Fpg, is tailored to specially remove 8-oxoG and its open-ring product 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyG) from DNA duplex [10,11,12,13]. 8-OxoG is pre-mutagenic, because it may pair with adenine instead of cytosine, resulting in a G:C-to-T:A transversion during DNA replication [14, 15]. Despite the vulnerability of guanine and the mutagenicity of 8-oxoG, the compositional pattern of the human genome shows a high level of heterogeneity, and the density of genes is much greater in the GC-rich regions [16, 17]. In addition, 72% human gene promoters are guanine-rich [18]. Intriguingly, the transcriptional activity of genes is positively correlated with the GC content in gene regulatory regions [16, 17]. The genes prone to be actively transcribed are densely distributed in high GC-content regions, whereas those in a tissue-dependent or developmentally regulated manner are usually sparsely distributed in GC-poor regions. The correlation of the GC content and the distribution pattern of genes imply that guanine oxidation and its cognate enzyme OGG1 have the potential to be exploited in gene expression.
Recently, increasing evidence is calling attention to the non-repair functions of BER enzymes [19,20,21,22,23]. This review aims to discuss the significance of 8-oxoG as an epigenetic mark and stimuli-driven roles of OGG1 in gene expression modulation.
Pre-base-excision role of OGG1 in transcription regulation
It has been well established that the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as signaling molecules [24]. The putative mechanism of cell responses to ROS has long been attributed to thiol modifications on cysteine (Cys) residue(s) of the proteins that play key roles in intracellular signal pathways [25,26,27]. Attention has been focused on the effect of ROS on the redox status of reactive Cys residues located within the DNA-binding domain of transcription factors (TFs). The redox status of Cys may control the transcriptional activity of the TFs, including Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-κB), activator protein 1 (AP-1), transcriptional activator Myb (Myb), cyclic adenosine 3,5-monophosphate response element-binding protein (CREB), early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1), hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α), and tumor protein p53 (TP53) [28,29,30,31,32]. Recent research described a unique model how ROS influence transcription activation, which involves guanine oxidation in promoter regions and a pre-base-excision role of OGG1 in transcription.
The transcriptional activation of pro-inflammatory genes is mostly regulated by ROS-mediated signaling. However, pro-inflammatory genes usually have high GC-content promoters that are readily to be oxidized under oxidative stress. In response to stimuli, mRNA levels of TNF-α, CXCL1, CXCL2, CCL20, and IL-1β were rapidly (within 30 min) and robustly upregulated in human HEK293 cells, murine MLE-12 cells, and mouse lung. The induction of pro-inflammatory genes was significantly diminished due to OGG1 deficiency [33,34,35]. Inflammatory stimuli increase intracellular ROS, and consequently, the level of guanine lesions. How OGG1 facilitates the transcription from GC-rich promoters may be readily explained as that ROS damage high G-content promoters, and the repair of guanine lesions secures promoter integrity and ensures the recognition of trans factors to their cis elements. However, the burst of pro-inflammatory gene expression is coincided with the summits of intracellular ROS level, as well as genomic 8-oxoG content in gene regulatory regions [33,34,35]. Guanine lesions left unrepaired were interpreted because of cysteine-based enzymatic inactivation of OGG1 under oxidative stress, and OGG1 can regain its repair activity after redox balance reestablished [34, 36,37,38]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and molecular biological assays further showed that, along with the increase in 8-oxoG level in promoters, OGG1 binds to the substrates without removal of the latter. The binding of enzymatically inactive OGG1 at promoters was followed by the assembly of transcriptional machinery. The interaction of OGG1 with sequence-specific TFs including NF-κB and specificity protein 1 (Sp1), general TFs such as TF IID, and phosphorylated RNA polymerase II, was induced upon the exposure of cells to the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α. However, these interactions were prevented by ROS scavenger [33]. ChIP assay showed a decreased enrichment of NF-κB on promoters after OGG1 depletion, which supports the role of OGG1 in the recruitment of components of transcriptional machinery [33, 34].
NF-κB, a master regulator of gene expression, has been shown to be regulated by ROS that are induced by various inflammatory stimuli including cytokines/chemokines and infectious agents [39,40,41]. The mechanism by which DNA repair enzyme OGG1 engages with its genomic substrates is well established; however, the effect of OGG1-substrate engagement on NF- κB recruitment and its transcription activation has not been fully elucidated. The role of guanine lesions located within binding motifs of TFs (such as NF-κB, Sp1, AP-1, and CREB1) with or without the presence of OGG1 has been investigated by utilizing synthetic DNA and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs). In the lack of OGG1, the effects of replacement of individual guanines for 8-oxoG in motifs of TFs resulted in the altered TF binding, yet the conclusions drawn from these studies were controversial [42,43,44,45]. Recently, it was demonstrated that recombinant OGG1 or the nuclear extract from OGG1-expressing cells enhanced the binding of NF-κB to DNA with 8-oxoG located several nucleotides upstream from the motif, whereas, 8-oxoG being within or closely proximal to NF-κB-binding site decreased its occupancy, which may involve either 8-oxoG itself or OGG1’s shielding effect [34, 35]. Wang et al. analyzed the surrounding sequences (10 bp upstream and downstream from the motif) of total 70 functional human κB sites. Their data revealed that the frequencies of guanine existence at − 8 and − 10 bases away from κB motif are more than 40%, notably higher than other positions [46], implying that the correctly positioned guanine oxidation may favor homing of TFs to sites through interaction with the cognate repair enzyme. Given that BER involves a strand break intermediate [44], a model how OGG1 modulates the transcription of NF-κB-targeting cytokine/chemokine genes may be described as follows. Timely oxidative inactivation of OGG1 prevents the burst of strand break generation in G cluster-containing promoters. Despite the compromised catalytic activity, binding of OGG1 to its substrate still possesses the capability to introduce a sharp (~ 70°) bend of the DNA duplex in the pre-lesion-excision step of BER [47,48,49], which induces allosteric change of DNA in chromatin context and creates a specific interface allowing the prompt recognition of motifs by NF-κB and then the assembly of the transcriptional initiation complex [50] (Fig. 1).
Pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines represent a typical class of innate immune response genes that can be immediately upregulated along with the burst of intracellular ROS. Evidence is showing that, in a timely view, guanine’s oxidation product is not only a lesion to be repaired but serves as a ligand for OGG1, and together, they play a role in the recruitment of TFs and the assembly of transcriptional machinery [33,34,35], to assure a prompt launch of the immediately responsive transcriptome. Studies are suggesting that guanine in DNA duplex is an ROS sensor, and OGG1 is a coordinator, to regulate the transcription from ROS-responding genes in the biological processes such as immune response [21, 51].
OGG1-BER enzymatic activity-dependent promoter activation
Studies also depicted mechanisms by which OGG1 plays key roles in transcriptional activation depending on its BER activity and the removal of its substrate. Dr. Gillespie’s study documented that, in hypoxia, mitochondria-generated ROS stimulate the accumulation of hypoxic gene transcriptional regulator hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [52], and cause oxidative base modifications in hypoxic response elements (HREs) of hypoxia-inducible genes [53]. When the hypoxia ROS-induced base modifications are prevented or OGG1 expression is inhibited, HIF-1 fails to associate with the HRE in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoter and gene expression at mRNA level is blunted [53]. The precise molecular mechanism, by which 8-oxoG formed in promoter upregulates VEGF expression, was dissected by Dr. Burrows’ group. When 8-oxoG is formed in guanine-rich, potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences (PQS) in coding strand of the promoter, OGG1 yields an AP site. The AP site enables melting of the duplex to unmask the PQS, adopting a G-quadruplex fold (G4 structure/motif) that has regulatory role in transcription activation (Fig. 2a) [54]. APE1 binds to, but inefficiently cleaves AP site, inducing transcription activation of VEGF or endonuclease III-like protein 1 (NTHL1) genes, most likely with the aid of other activating factors [55]. In this hypoxia-induced transcription activation model, function of OGG1 is manifested at a post-lesion-excision stage. In this scenario, in response to hypoxia-induced ROS, Hif-1 accumulation is primary for VEGF expression; thus, it is likely that the resume of glycosylase activity of OGG1 due to the restoration of physiological cellular redox status [36, 37] is the key for adoption of the cis element G-quadruplex fold, which is temporally coordinated with the accumulation of the trans factor Hif-1. The analyses of PQSs recently were extended to promoters of DNA repair genes, and results showed that PQSs exist at a high density. Gene expression increases when the PQS is in the coding strand, whereas decrease when the PQS is in the template strand [56]. However, 8-oxoG in the template strand of the promoter is not repaired by BER, but primarily by transcription-coupled (TC)-nucleotide excision repair (NER) [57]. G4 formation has been observed in synthetic oligonucleotide sequences derived from the human genome, particularly those from gene promoters and telomeres. Computational predictions suggest that more than 300,000 sequence motifs in the human genome have the potential to form a G4 structure [58]. While the fact that G4 structure forms in promoter regions in vivo and whether its stabilization constitutes a layer of epigenetic gene expression regulation requires further experimental support, OGG1’s role in gene transcription modulation through G4 structure formation needs to be unscrambled in biologically relevant contexts.
Roles of OGG1 in modulating transcription from G-quadruplex-containing promoters. a OGG1-initiated 8-oxoG removal from the coding stand of promoter allows transformation of PQS into G-quadruplex and transcriptional activation. b 8-oxoG in the KRAS PQS facilitates the reconstitution of the double helix. OGG1 excises 8-oxoG from PQS in double helix and thereby facilitates the binding of nuclear factors to their cognate sequences, resulting in activation of transcription. PQS potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences
Proto-oncogenes in human genome [such as MYC and Kirsten Ras (K-RAS)] have PQS in their promoters, whose activation is influenced by oxidative stress [59]. A recent study presented another role of OGG1 in G-quadruplex-based transcription regulation, during which OGG1 behaves as a bona fide BER enzyme. In the promoter of the KRAS oncogene, there is a G-rich region, which able to fold into a G-quadruplex structure (G4 motif). This unusual DNA conformation is recognized by nuclear proteins including MYC-associated zinc-finger protein (MAZ) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNP A1) [59, 60]. MAZ recognizes runs of guanines, unfolds the G-quadruplex, and leads to the transformation of G-quadruplex into duplexes [60]. Guanine oxidation is shown to be higher in a sequence able to fold into G4 motif compared with other G-rich regions [59]. The incorporation of 8-oxoG in a G-tetrad enhances the recruitment of MAZ and hnRNP A1, and destabilizes the G-quadruplex [59]. OGG1 is recruited to the KRAS G4 motif region that carries 8-oxoG more than non-G4 regions when the cells are treated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2) inhibitor that causes increased cellular ROS [59]. In this scenario, 8-oxoG itself first plays a positive role in promoting the recruitment of MAZ and hnRNP A1, whose first role is to unfold the inhibitory G-quadruplex into duplex. And then, 8-oxoG becomes negative due to its impediment to the sequence recognition of MAZ, hnRNP A1 (whose roles are as TFs at this stage), as well as other components of transcriptional machinery; thus, OGG1, maybe plus APE1, removes the obstacle, augmenting the promoter occupation of the transcriptional machinery (Fig. 2b).
A previous study also documented that the productive transcription is achieved upon the formation of the strand break generated through OGG1-BER [61]. Estrogen (E2) treatment induced estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) binding to estrogen-responsive DNA elements (EREs), as well as loop formation between the promoter of anti-apoptotic gene bcl-2 and the ERE enhancer. In parallel, the lysine-specific demethylase1 (LSD1)-triggered demethylation of K3K9me2 at promoter and enhancer sites resulted in the production of ROS. Estrogen-caused rapid genomic accumulation of 8-oxoG was tightly linked to LSD1 activation, because it was inhibited by monoamine oxidase inhibitor pargyline or LSD1 knockdown. Systematic analysis of chromatin downstream from bcl-2 EREs revealed that OGG1 and topoisomerase IIβ accumulated preferentially at the promoter and ERE sites, which was dependent on E2-induced activation of LSD1. Removal of the oxidized guanines by OGG1 generates transient nicks that function as the entry points for topoisomerase IIβ, triggering DNA conformational change to accommodate the transcription initiation complex to achieve transcription [61] (Fig. 3). In vitro studies demonstrated that OGG1 has glycosylase and AP-lyase activity, the latter cleaving the phosphodiester backbone at 3′ of the damaged base [42, 43]. However, in vivo studies documented that OGG1 behaves as a monofunctional DNA glycosylase [44, 45]; thus, catalyzing DNA strand cleavage for the entry of topoisomerase IIβ may need further assistance of APE1.
OGG1-BER-generated strand break activates transcription. The enzymatic activity of the lysine-specific demethylase LSD1 gives rise to a localized generation of H2O2, which oxidize G to 8-oxoG. Subsequently, OGG1-initiated base excision creates strand break, which serves as an entry for Top IIβ, triggering DNA conformational changes to accommodate the transcription initiation complex. LSD lysine-specific demethylase1, Top IIβ topoisomerase II beta
The roles of OGG1 in chromatin modifications
DNA and histone modifications represent the predominant aspects of epigenetic transcription regulations. A recent study revealed that OGG1 can recruit chromatin remodelers and modifiers to modulate gene expression [62]. Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4 (CHD4), a component of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) ATP-dependent remodeling complex, is recruited by OGG1 to oxidative DNA damage sites. Then CHD4 recruits repressive chromatin proteins, including DNA methyl-transferases (DNMTs), enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2), and euchromatic histone lysine methyl-transferase 2 (EHMT2, also known as G9a) to DNA damage site, where DNMTs impose de novo DNA methylation on cytosines, whereas EHMT2 and G9a catalyze key repressive histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K9me2, respectively. Repressive chromatin proteins help to maintain transcriptional silencing of tumor suppressor genes [61], which may account for tumorigenesis under chronic oxidative stress (Fig. 4). Importantly, although 8-oxoG accumulates, CHD4 fails to bind with tumor suppressor gene promoter in OGG1-deleted cells, indicating the prior role of OGG1 over 8-oxoG in facilitating the evolution of cancer epigenetic abnormalities.
OGG1 recruits chromatin remodelers and modifiers to affect gene expression. CHD4 is recruited by OGG1 to interact with oxidative DNA damage sites. Then CHD4 recruits repressive chromatin proteins including DNA methyl-transferases (DNMT1, 2) and histone H3K27 methyl-transferases (EZH2 and G9a) to DNA damage sites and help to maintain DNA hypermethylation-associated transcriptional silencing of tumor suppressor genes. CHD4 chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4, DNMT DNA methyl-transferase, EZH2 enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2, G9a euchromatic histone lysine methyl-transferase 2
Comparing data between OGG1-ChIP-Seq (accession #: GSE89017) [51] and DNA methylation by reduced representation bisulfite-Seq from ENCODE (accession #: GSE27584) [63], authors of this review also noticed an intriguing correlation between OGG1 peaks and DNA methylation sites in promoter regions of genes, such as those related to tissue remodeling and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (Fig. 5). OGG1 peaks are highly correlated with the sites hypermethylated in Smad7 and α-SMA promoters, and importantly, treatment with pro-inflammatory stimuli cytokine TNF-α induced a nearly twofold of increase in OGG1 recruitments. It still requires further investigation to understand the correlation of OGG1 peaks with cytosine methylation sites as well as the implication of inducible increase in OGG1 enrichment to the chromatin imposed by cytosine methylation.
OGG1 peaks are highly correlated with the sites hypermethylated in promoter regions of selected genes. a Smad7 and b α-SMA genes were represented. Upper panels in a and b, OGG1-ChIP-Seq data (accession #: GSE89017) show the enrichment of OGG1 on indicated genes in cells with or without 30-min treatment of cytokine TNF-α. Images were directly taken from integrative genome viewer (IGV). Lower panels in a and b, DNA methylation by reduced representation bisulfite-Seq data from ENCODE (accession #: GSE27584) show the methylated sites on indicated genes in A549, HepG2, and HL-60 out of 22 cell lines visualized by genome data viewer
OGG1 binds with promoter-located substrate followed by either recruitment of TFs or chromatin remodelers, suggesting diverse mechanisms of OGG1-mediated modulation of gene transcription. Accumulating studies suggested that OGG1 targets are wide-ranging. Indeed, system analysis of the genomic enrichment of OGG1 by ChIP-seq revealed that OGG1 peaks were primarily located in regulatory regions, especially, guanine-rich promoters; and OGG1-enriched promoters are linked to genes involved in cellular processes such as response to oxidative stress, immune response, signal transduction, and cellular homeostasis [21, 51].
Post-repair signaling by OGG1·8-oxoG complex
Promoter-located 8-oxoG plays an epigenetic role in transcription activation; on the other hand, the excised free 8-oxoG base along with its cognate enzyme OGG1 has been shown to induce post-repair cell activation signaling [64,65,66]. Results from studies in Dr. Boldogh’s laboratory documented the unexpected link between OGG1-initiated BER and cellular signaling via the RAS and RAS homology family GTPases. The role of free 8-oxoG was not obvious until it was observed that OGG1 binds 8-oxoG base (OGG1·8-oxoG complex) with high affinity. FapyG base, a nearly as good substrate for OGG1 when situated in DNA, is not bound by OGG1, and neither is 8-oxoguanosine. This supports the specificity of OGG1 and 8-oxoG base interaction [67]. The implication of these observations became evident from the results, showing that 8-oxoG-induced conformational change in OGG1 allows its interaction with small GTPases. OGG1·8-oxoG complex causes replacement of GDP with GTP in K-RAS, Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (N-RAS), and Harwey-RAS (H-RAS). Follow-up studies documented that OGG1·8-oxoG also catalyzes the GTP → GDP release, so it induces nucleotide releases and allows rebinding [67]; thus, OGG1·8-oxoG functions as a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF). 8-OxoG base exposure of cells or its in cellulo release from genome upon activation of OGG1-BER increases the levels of RAS-GTP. RAS-GTP then induces phosphorylation of cellular homolog of viral raf gene (RAF1), MAPK kinase (MEK1/2), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinases (PI3K), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), as well as the nuclear translocation of ERK1/2 [66]. It was reported that the OGG1-initiated repair of genomic 8-oxoG and consequent formation of OGG1·8-oxoG via MAPK and IP3K kinases lead to activation of TFs including NF-κB, increase the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, and induce robust innate inflammation (Fig. 6). Mice deficient in Ogg1 showed significantly decreased inflammatory cell recruitment to the airways, whereas a lack of Nei-like DNA glycosylases 2 (NEIL2) increased inflammatory responses [66]. RAS activation by 8-oxoG administration was also observed in mouse C2C12 myoblasts, which was followed by activation ERK1/2 and an increase in DNA binding of myogenic regulatory factor D (MyoD) with Myogenin promoter. This led to the upregulation of Myogenin and the accumulation of its targets (Dr. Ba’s unpublished data). These data provided the evidence for the hypothesis that exercise-generated ROS could be beneficial for regeneration of adult skeletal muscle [68].
The RAS homology (RHO) family of small GTPases has been shown to interact with OGG1·8-oxoG complex in a guanine-nucleotide-free form, while the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1) interacts with it in GDP-bound form. The latter interaction led to an increased level of RAC1-GTP, but not to GTP → GDP exchange in contrast to H-, K-, or N-RAS. Activation of RAC1 led to increased activity of nuclear membrane-associated NADPH oxidase type 4, consequently to distinct site-specific generation of ROS in the nuclei of cells [69]. These data imply that OGG1-BER → OGG1·8-oxoG → RAC1 activation → site-specific ROS generation is a part of an integrated circuit for genomic 8-oxoG regeneration, which is serving as an epigenetic mark for gene expression.
To examine overall significance of OGG1·8-oxoG complex-driven signaling at system level of gene expression, whole transcriptome analysis was undertaken [70, 71]. Summary of these results allows authors to speculate that OGG1-BER and consequent activation of signaling cascades are links between oxidative stress and post-repair cellular responses, including reestablishment of homeostasis. Indeed, genes activated by OGG1·8-oxoG → RAS/RHO/RAC signaling include ATPases participating in setting electrolyte tone of cells, collagen types, and G protein-coupled receptors—all of which were previously associated with homeostatic states. Another overrepresented biological process is immune system process mediated by C–C and C–X–C cytokines and chemokines—a special composition of mediators that are associated with reestablishment of pre-exposure homeostatic state. These findings lead to a hypothesis that post-repair OGG1·8-oxoG → RAS/RHO/RAC signaling is essential for survival and homeostasis [40, 41]. In addition, OGG1-BER mimicked by repeatedly exposing human diploid lung cells to 8-oxoG base led to G1 cell cycle arrest and pre-matured senescence. High-throughput analysis showed that over 1000 genes were differentially expressed and nearly 90% of genes were identical to those in naturally senesced cells [72]. Gene ontology analysis has identified biological processes driven by small GTPases, PI3Ks, and MAPKs, which led to the hypothesis that chronic OGG1-driven post-repair signaling potentially results in celluar senescence [72]. Taken together, post-repair signaling by OGG1·8-oxoG complex is an important process, the primary function of which is to reestablish pre-exposure cellular/tissue physiological state, but when it is repeated, it may contribute to chronic diseases as well as accelerated aging processes.
Conclusion
There is mounting evidence, showing that genomic 8-oxoG is not only a pre-mutagenic DNA base lesion but also has an essential role in the modulation of gene expression along with its cognate repair OGG1. As illustrated in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8-oxoG may serve as an epigenetic mark. OGG1 interacts with the substrates, with or without 8-oxoG excision, inducing conformational changes in adjacent DNA sequences and making easy access of TFs, or recruiting chromatin modifiers/remodelers to their binding sites. Figure 6 shows a second mechanism, which differs from the first by formation of a post-repair complex that is capable of activating small GTPases, and, consequently, downstream cellular signaling. The early studies have linked the accumulation of oxidized guanines to changes in molecular and biological processes, including development of the central nervous and cardiovascular system, Huntington’s disease, obesity-metabolic disorders, mitochondrial dysfunction, and decreased innate and allergic inflammation in OGG1-deficient/Ogg1 KO mice [73,74,75,76]. These epidemiological findings were conventionally explained by genotoxicity of guanine lesions; however, in the view of new evidence, it appears that cells are utilizing 8-oxoG and its cognate repair protein OGG1 to orchestrate a variety of transcriptomes in redox-regulated biological processes. Thus, we may conclude that the deviations/variations from the coordination between the OGG1-initiated repair and transcriptional regulation other than mutagenicity of 8-oxoG account for the etiologic link of 8-oxoG to pathological processes related to immunity, metabolism, cancer or degenerative disorders.
Abbreviations
- 8-oxoG:
-
7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine
- APE1:
-
Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1
- AP site:
-
Apurinic/apyrimidinic site
- BER:
-
Base excision repair
- CHD4:
-
Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4
- GEF:
-
Guanine-nucleotide exchange factor
- HIF-1:
-
Hypoxia-inducible factor-1
- KRAS:
-
Kirsten Ras
- LSD1:
-
Lysine-specific demethylase 1
- NF-κB:
-
Nuclear factor kappa B
- OGG1:
-
8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1
- PQS:
-
Potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- TFs:
-
Transcription factors
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
References
Lindahl T (1974) An N-glycosidase from Escherichia coli that releases free uracil from DNA containing deaminated cytosine residues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71(9):3649–3653
Hegde ML, Hazra TK, Mitra S (2008) Early steps in the DNA base excision/single-strand interruption repair pathway in mammalian cells. Cell Res 18(1):27–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2008.8
Krokan HE, Bjoras M (2013) Base excision repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5(4):a012583. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012583
Doetsch PW, Cunningham RP (1990) The enzymology of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases. Mutat Res 236(2–3):173–201
Matsumoto Y, Kim K (1995) Excision of deoxyribose phosphate residues by DNA polymerase beta during DNA repair. Science 269(5224):699–702
Burrows CJ, Muller JG (1998) Oxidative nucleobase modifications leading to strand scission. Chem Rev 98(3):1109–1152
Candeias LP, Steenken S (2000) Reaction of HO* with guanine derivatives in aqueous solution: formation of two different redox-active OH-adduct radicals and their unimolecular transformation reactions. Properties of G(-H)*. Chemistry 6(3):475–484
Dizdaroglu M (1985) Formation of an 8-hydroxyguanine moiety in deoxyribonucleic acid on gamma-irradiation in aqueous solution. Biochemistry 24(16):4476–4481
Lindahl T, Barnes DE (2000) Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 65:127–133
Dizdaroglu M, Kirkali G, Jaruga P (2008) Formamidopyrimidines in DNA: mechanisms of formation, repair, and biological effects. Free Radic Biol Med 45(12):1610–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.07.004
Michaels ML, Pham L, Cruz C, Miller JH (1991) MutM, a protein that prevents G.C—T.A transversions, is formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase. Nucleic Acids Res 19(13):3629–3632
Hazra TK, Das A, Das S, Choudhury S, Kow YW, Roy R (2007) Oxidative DNA damage repair in mammalian cells: a new perspective. DNA Repair (Amst) 6(4):470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.011
Mitra S, Izumi T, Boldogh I, Bhakat KK, Hill JW, Hazra TK (2002) Choreography of oxidative damage repair in mammalian genomes. Free Radic Biol Med 33(1):15–28
Grollman AP, Moriya M (1993) Mutagenesis by 8-oxoguanine: an enemy within. Trends Genet 9(7):246–249
Radak Z, Boldogh I (2010) 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine: links to gene expression, aging, and defense against oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med 49(4):587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.008
D’Onofrio G, Jabbari K, Musto H, Alvarez-Valin F, Cruveiller S, Bernardi G (1999) Evolutionary genomics of vertebrates and its implications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 870:81–94
Gautier C (2000) Compositional bias in DNA. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10(6):656–661
Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag DL (2006) A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(5):1412–1417. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510310103
Antoniali G, Malfatti MC, Tell G (2017) Unveiling the non-repair face of the Base Excision Repair pathway in RNA processing: a missing link between DNA repair and gene expression? DNA Repair (Amst) 56:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.008
Antoniali G, Lirussi L, Poletto M, Tell G (2014) Emerging roles of the nucleolus in regulating the DNA damage response: the noncanonical DNA repair enzyme APE1/Ref-1 as a paradigmatical example. Antioxid Redox Signal 20(4):621–639. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5491
Ba X, Boldogh I (2018) 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1: beyond repair of the oxidatively modified base lesions. Redox Biol 14:669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2017.11.008
Fleming AM, Burrows CJ (2017) 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, friend and foe: epigenetic-like regulator versus initiator of mutagenesis. DNA Repair (Amst) 56:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.009
Li J, Braganza A, Sobol RW (2013) Base excision repair facilitates a functional relationship between Guanine oxidation and histone demethylation. Antioxid Redox Signal 18(18):2429–2443. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.5107
Sen CK, Packer L (1996) Antioxidant and redox regulation of gene transcription. FASEB J 10(7):709–720
Miki H, Funato Y (2012) Regulation of intracellular signalling through cysteine oxidation by reactive oxygen species. J Biochem 151(3):255–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvs006
Mieyal JJ, Chock PB (2012) Posttranslational modification of cysteine in redox signaling and oxidative stress: focus on s-glutathionylation. Antioxid Redox Signal 16(6):471–475. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.4454
Wang Y, Yang J, Yi J (2012) Redox sensing by proteins: oxidative modifications on cysteines and the consequent events. Antioxid Redox Signal 16(7):649–657. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.4313
Xanthoudakis S, Miao G, Wang F, Pan YC, Curran T (1992) Redox activation of Fos-Jun DNA binding activity is mediated by a DNA repair enzyme. EMBO J 11(9):3323–3335
Nishi T, Shimizu N, Hiramoto M, Sato I, Yamaguchi Y, Hasegawa M, Aizawa S, Tanaka H, Kataoka K, Watanabe H, Handa H (2002) Spatial redox regulation of a critical cysteine residue of NF-kappa B in vivo. J Biol Chem 277(46):44548–44556. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202970200
Huang RP, Adamson ED (1993) Characterization of the DNA-binding properties of the early growth response-1 (Egr-1) transcription factor: evidence for modulation by a redox mechanism. DNA Cell Biol 12(3):265–273. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.1993.12.265
Huang LE, Arany Z, Livingston DM, Bunn HF (1996) Activation of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor depends primarily upon redox-sensitive stabilization of its alpha subunit. J Biol Chem 271(50):32253–32259
Seo YR, Kelley MR, Smith ML (2002) Selenomethionine regulation of p53 by a ref1-dependent redox mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(22):14548–14553. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.212319799
Ba X, Bacsi A, Luo J, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Zeng X, Radak Z, Brasier AR, Boldogh I (2014) 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 augments proinflammatory gene expression by facilitating the recruitment of site-specific transcription factors. J Immunol 192(5):2384–2394. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1302472
Pan L, Zhu B, Hao W, Zeng X, Vlahopoulos SA, Hazra TK, Hegde ML, Radak Z, Bacsi A, Brasier AR, Ba X, Boldogh I (2016) Oxidized guanine base lesions function in 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-mediated epigenetic regulation of nuclear factor kappaB-driven gene expression. J Biol Chem 291(49):25553–25566. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.751453
Pan L, Hao W, Zheng X, Zeng X, Ahmed Abbasi A, Boldogh I, Ba X (2017) OGG1-DNA interactions facilitate NF-kappaB binding to DNA targets. Sci Rep 7:43297. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43297
Bravard A, Vacher M, Gouget B, Coutant A, de Boisferon FH, Marsin S, Chevillard S, Radicella JP (2006) Redox regulation of human OGG1 activity in response to cellular oxidative stress. Mol Cell Biol 26(20):7430–7436. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00624-06
Bravard A, Campalans A, Vacher M, Gouget B, Levalois C, Chevillard S, Radicella JP (2010) Inactivation by oxidation and recruitment into stress granules of hOGG1 but not APE1 in human cells exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of cadmium. Mutat Res 685(1–2):61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.09.013
Morreall J, Limpose K, Sheppard C, Kow YW, Werner E, Doetsch PW (2015) Inactivation of a common OGG1 variant by TNF-alpha in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 26:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.11.007
Brasier AR (2010) The nuclear factor-kappaB-interleukin-6 signalling pathway mediating vascular inflammation. Cardiovasc Res 86(2):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvq076
Tian B, Brasier AR (2003) Identification of a nuclear factor kappa B-dependent gene network. Recent Prog Horm Res 58:95–130
Vlahopoulos SA, Cen O, Hengen N, Agan J, Moschovi M, Critselis E, Adamaki M, Bacopoulou F, Copland JA, Boldogh I, Karin M, Chrousos GP (2015) Dynamic aberrant NF-kappaB spurs tumorigenesis: a new model encompassing the microenvironment. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 26(4):389–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.06.001
Nash HM, Lu R, Lane WS, Verdine GL (1997) The critical active-site amine of the human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, hOgg1: direct identification, ablation and chemical reconstitution. Chem Biol 4(9):693–702
Fromme JC, Bruner SD, Yang W, Karplus M, Verdine GL (2003) Product-assisted catalysis in base-excision DNA repair. Nat Struct Biol 10(3):204–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb902
Allgayer J, Kitsera N, Bartelt S, Epe B, Khobta A (2016) Widespread transcriptional gene inactivation initiated by a repair intermediate of 8-oxoguanine. Nucleic Acids Res 44(15):7267–7280. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw473
Hill JW, Hazra TK, Izumi T, Mitra S (2001) Stimulation of human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase by AP-endonuclease: potential coordination of the initial steps in base excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res 29(2):430–438
Wang T, Li J, Ding K, Zhang L, Che Q, Sun X, Dai Y, Sun W, Bao M, Wang X, Yang L, Li Z (2017) The CpG dinucleotide adjacent to a κB site affects NF-κB function through its methylation. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030528
Bruner SD, Norman DP, Verdine GL (2000) Structural basis for recognition and repair of the endogenous mutagen 8-oxoguanine in DNA. Nature 403(6772):859–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002510
Christy B, Nathans D (1989) DNA binding site of the growth factor-inducible protein Zif268. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(22):8737–8741
Dunn AR, Kad NM, Nelson SR, Warshaw DM, Wallace SS (2011) Single Qdot-labeled glycosylase molecules use a wedge amino acid to probe for lesions while scanning along DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 39(17):7487–7498. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr459
Travers AA (1990) Why bend DNA? Cell 60(2):177–180
Hao W, Qi T, Pan L, Wang R, Zhu B, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Radak Z, Hazra TK, Vlahopoulos SA, Bacsi A, Brasier AR, Ba X, Boldogh I (2018) Effects of the stimuli-dependent enrichment of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase1 on chromatinized DNA. Redox Biol 18:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.06.002
Ruchko MV, Gorodnya OM, Pastukh VM, Swiger BM, Middleton NS, Wilson GL, Gillespie MN (2009) Hypoxia-induced oxidative base modifications in the VEGF hypoxia-response element are associated with transcriptionally active nucleosomes. Free Radic Biol Med 46(3):352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.038
Pastukh V, Roberts JT, Clark DW, Bardwell GC, Patel M, Al-Mehdi AB, Borchert GM, Gillespie MN (2015) An oxidative DNA “damage” and repair mechanism localized in the VEGF promoter is important for hypoxia-induced VEGF mRNA expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 309(11):L1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00236.2015
Rhodes D, Lipps HJ (2015) G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology. Nucleic Acids Res 43(18):8627–8637. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv862
Fleming AM, Ding Y, Burrows CJ (2017) Oxidative DNA damage is epigenetic by regulating gene transcription via base excision repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(10):2604–2609. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619809114
Fleming AM, Zhu J, Ding Y, Visser JA, Burrows CJ (2018) Human DNA repair genes possess potential G-quadruplex sequences in their promoters and 5′-untranslated regions. Biochemistry 57(6):991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01172
Fleming AM, Zhu J, Ding Y, Burrows CJ (2017) 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in the context of a gene promoter G-quadruplex is an on-off switch for transcription. ACS Chem Biol 12(9):2417–2426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00636
Hansel-Hertsch R, Di Antonio M, Balasubramanian S (2017) DNA G-quadruplexes in the human genome: detection, functions and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(5):279–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.3
Cogoi S, Ferino A, Miglietta G, Pedersen EB, Xodo LE (2018) The regulatory G4 motif of the Kirsten ras (KRAS) gene is sensitive to guanine oxidation: implications on transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 46(2):661–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1142
Cogoi S, Shchekotikhin AE, Xodo LE (2014) HRAS is silenced by two neighboring G-quadruplexes and activated by MAZ, a zinc-finger transcription factor with DNA unfolding property. Nucleic Acids Res 42(13):8379–8388. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku574
Perillo B, Ombra MN, Bertoni A, Cuozzo C, Sacchetti S, Sasso A, Chiariotti L, Malorni A, Abbondanza C, Avvedimento EV (2008) DNA oxidation as triggered by H3K9me2 demethylation drives estrogen-induced gene expression. Science 319(5860):202–206. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147674
Xia L, Huang W, Bellani M, Seidman MM, Wu K, Fan D, Nie Y, Cai Y, Zhang YW, Yu LR, Li H, Zahnow CA, Xie W, Chiu Yen RW, Rassool FV, Baylin SB (2017) CHD4 has oncogenic functions in initiating and maintaining epigenetic suppression of multiple tumor suppressor genes. Cancer Cell 31(5):653–668 e657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.04.005
Wang H, Maurano MT, Qu H, Varley KE, Gertz J, Pauli F, Lee K, Canfield T, Weaver M, Sandstrom R, Thurman RE, Kaul R, Myers RM, Stamatoyannopoulos JA (2012) Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation. Genome Res 22(9):1680–1688. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.136101.111
Ba X, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Rashid QT, Bacsi A, Radak Z, Sur S, Hosoki K, Hegde ML, Boldogh I (2014) The role of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 in inflammation. Int J Mol Sci 15(9):16975–16997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150916975
Ba X, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Sur S, Boldogh I (2015) 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-driven DNA base excision repair: role in asthma pathogenesis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 15(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000135
Aguilera-Aguirre L, Bacsi A, Radak Z, Hazra TK, Mitra S, Sur S, Brasier AR, Ba X, Boldogh I (2014) Innate inflammation induced by the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-KRAS-NF-kappaB pathway. J Immunol 193(9):4643–4653. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1401625
Boldogh I, Hajas G, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Hegde ML, Radak Z, Bacsi A, Sur S, Hazra TK, Mitra S (2012) Activation of ras signaling pathway by 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase bound to its excision product, 8-oxoguanine. J Biol Chem 287(25):20769–20773. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C112.364620
Le Moal E, Pialoux V, Juban G, Groussard C, Zouhal H, Chazaud B, Mounier R (2017) Redox control of skeletal muscle regeneration. Antioxid Redox Signal 27(5):276–310. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2016.6782
Hajas G, Bacsi A, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Hegde ML, Tapas KH, Sur S, Radak Z, Ba X, Boldogh I (2013) 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 links DNA repair to cellular signaling via the activation of the small GTPase Rac1. Free Radic Biol Med 61:384–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.04.011
Aguilera-Aguirre L, Hosoki K, Bacsi A, Radak Z, Wood TG, Widen SG, Sur S, Ameredes BT, Saavedra-Molina A, Brasier AR, Ba X, Boldogh I (2015) Whole transcriptome analysis reveals an 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-driven DNA repair-dependent gene expression linked to essential biological processes. Free Radic Biol Med 81:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.01.004
Aguilera-Aguirre L, Hosoki K, Bacsi A, Radak Z, Sur S, Hegde ML, Tian B, Saavedra-Molina A, Brasier AR, Ba X, Boldogh I (2015) Whole transcriptome analysis reveals a role for OGG1-initiated DNA repair signaling in airway remodeling. Free Radic Biol Med 89:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.07.007
German P, Saenz D, Szaniszlo P, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Pan L, Hegde ML, Bacsi A, Hajas G, Radak Z, Ba X, Mitra S, Papaconstantinou J, Boldogh I (2017) 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase1-driven DNA repair-A paradoxical role in lung aging. Mech Ageing Dev 161(1):51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2016.06.009
Wong AW, McCallum GP, Jeng W, Wells PG (2008) Oxoguanine glycosylase 1 protects against methamphetamine-enhanced fetal brain oxidative DNA damage and neurodevelopmental deficits. J Neurosci 28(36):9047–9054. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2557-08.2008
Touati E, Michel V, Thiberge JM, Ave P, Huerre M, Bourgade F, Klungland A, Labigne A (2006) Deficiency in OGG1 protects against inflammation and mutagenic effects associated with H. pylori infection in mouse. Helicobacter 11(5):494–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-5378.2006.00442.x
Mabley JG, Pacher P, Deb A, Wallace R, Elder RH, Szabo C (2005) Potential role for 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase in regulating inflammation. FASEB J 19(2):290–292. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-2278fje
Sampath H, Vartanian V, Rollins MR, Sakumi K, Nakabeppu Y, Lloyd RS (2012) 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) deficiency increases susceptibility to obesity and metabolic dysfunction. PLoS One 7(12):e51697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051697
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 31571339 and 31371293 to XB), the Program for Introducing Talent to Universities (Grant number: B07017 to XB), The State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council (No. 201706625004 to XB), and United States National Institute of Environmental Health and Sciences (Grant number: RO1 ES018948 to IB); United States National Institute of Allergic and Infectious Diseases (Grant number: AI062885, to IB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, R., Hao, W., Pan, L. et al. The roles of base excision repair enzyme OGG1 in gene expression. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75, 3741–3750 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2887-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2887-8