Skip to main content
Log in

Computer use and physical inactivity in young adults: Public health perils and potentials of new information technologies

  • Empirical Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Physical inactivity contributes to premature mortality and morbidity and increasing prevalences of overweight and obesity in industrialized countries. Computer use is an increasingly common sedentary behaviour, potentially displacing physical activity. Physical activity and computer use were examined in 697 young adults (18–30 years). Energy expenditure estimates were derived from self-reported walking, moderate, and vigorous activity; participants were classified as sedentary, low, moderate, or high in their level of activity. For multivariate analyses, two categories of physical activity were used: inactive (sedentary/low activity; <800 kcal·week−1) or active (moderate/high activity; ≥800 kcal·week−1). Time spent in computer-related activities was summed, and computer use tertiles calculated (<3 hours·week−1; 3–8 hours·week; >8 hours·week−1). Those in the highest tertile of computer use were most likely to be inactive (p=0.003) and most likely to report computer use as a barrier to physical activity (p<0.001). The majority of those in the top two tertiles of computer use, and of the inactive, preferred obtaining information from computers than from conventional print media. These findings suggest that computer use plays a significant role in the discretionary time of young adults and is negatively associated with physical activity. Computer-mediated communication has potential in disseminating interventions to increase physical activity in young adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council:Acting on Australia’s Weight: A Strategic Plan for the Prevention of Overweight and Obesity. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printing Service, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S, et al: Physical Activity and Public Health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995,273:402–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Owen N, Bauman A: The descriptive epidemiology of a sedentary lifestyle in adult Australians.International Journal of Epidemiology. 1992,21:305–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcus BH, Owen N, Forsyth LH, Cavill NA, Fridinger F: Physical activity interventions using mass media, print media, and information technology.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998,15:362–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sallis JF: Age-related decline in physical activity: A synthesis of human and animal studies.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000,32:1598–1600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Department of Commerce:Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Department of Commerce:Falling Through the Net III: Defining the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Australian Bureau of Statistics:Population Survey Monitor. ABS Catalogue No. 4103.0. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broderick D:The Spike. Kew, Victoria: Reed Books Australia, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doheny-Farina S:The Wired Neighbourhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lunenfeld P:The Digital Dialectic—New Essays on New Media. Boston, MA: The MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams CD, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Burke R: Psychosocial and demographic correlates of television viewing.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1999,13:207–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sidney S, Sternfeld B, Haskell WL, et al: Television viewing and cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: The CARDIA study.Annals of Epidemiology. 1996,6:154–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Salmon J, Bauman A, Crawford C, Timperio A, Owen N: The association between television viewing and overweight among Australian adults participating in varying levels of leisure-time physical activity.International Journal of Obesity. 2000,24:600–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health:Wired for Health and Well-Being: The Emergence of Interactive Health Communication (Eng TR, Gustafson DH [eds]). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abrams DB, Mills S, Bulger D: Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:299–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B: One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:276–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bental DS, Cawsey A, Jones R: Patient information systems that tailor to the individual.Patient Education and Counseling. 1999,36:171–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Gore CJ: Relationship between a 14-day recall measure of leisure time physical activity and a submaximal test of physical work capacity in a population sample of Australian adults.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1996,67:221–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Gore CJ: Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults.International Journal of Epidemiology. 1996,25:153–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leslie E, Owen N, Salmon J, et al: Insufficiently-active Australian college students: Perceived personal, social, and environmental influences.Preventive Medicine. 1999,28:20–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care:National Physical Activity Guidelines for Australians. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel S:Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (International Edition), Tokyo, Japan: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz WH: The role of lifestyle in health: The epidemiology and consequences of inactivity.Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 1996,55:829–840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pate R, Health GW, Dawda M, Trost SG: Associations between physical activity and other health behaviors in a representative sample of U.S. adolescents.American Journal of Public Health. 1996,86:1577–1581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Australian Bureau of Statistics:Australia at a Glance. ABS Catalogue No. 4309.0. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rimal RN, Flora JA: Interactive technology attributes in health promotion: Practical and theoretical issues. In Street RL, Gold WR, Manning T (eds).Health Promotion and Interactive Technology: Theoretical Applications and Future Directions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  29. National Academy of Science:The Unpredictable Certainty: Information Infrastructure through 2000. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson TN, Patrick K, Eng TR, Gustafson D: An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: A challenge to medicine in the information age.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998,280:1264–1269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ching PLYH, Willett WC, Rimm EB, et al: Activity level and risk of overweight in male health professionals.American Journal of Public Health. 1996,86:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Williamson DE, Madans J, Anda RF, et al: Recreational physical activity and ten-year weight change in a U.S. national cohort.International Journal of Obesity. 1993,17:279–286.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hawkins RP, Gustafson DH, Chewning B, Bosworth K, Day PM: Reaching hard-to-reach populations: Interactive computer programs as public information campaigns for adolescents.Journal of Communication. 1987,37:8–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson R, Bikson T, Law S, Mitchell B:Universal Access to E-Mail. Feasibility and Societal Implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider SJ, Schwartz MD, Fast J: Computerized, telephone-based health promotion: I. Smoking cessation program.Computers in Human Behavior. 1995,11:135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schneider SJ, Schwartz MD, Fast J: Computerized, telephone-based health promotion: II. Stress management program.Computers in Human Behavior. 1995,11:205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sproull L, Kiesler S:Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rhodes F, Fishbein M, Reis J: Using behavioral theory in computer-based health promotion and appraisal.Health Education & Behavior. 1997,24:20–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Barker RG:Ecological Psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sallis JF, Owen N: Ecological models. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd Ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M: Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998,15:379–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Melanson EL, Freedson PS: Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) monitor.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1995,27:934–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was support in part by a National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health Post-Doctoral Fellowship to Michael J. Fotheringham, Ph.D. (#997020).

The authors thank Jo Salmon for her helpful comments.

About this article

Cite this article

Fotheringham, M.J., Wonnacott, R.L. & Owen, N. Computer use and physical inactivity in young adults: Public health perils and potentials of new information technologies. Ann Behav Med 22, 269–275 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895662

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895662

Keywords

Navigation