Skip to main content
Log in

Relative efficiencies of goodness of fit procedures for assessing univariate normality

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Efficiency properties of the Cramér-von Mises, Anderson-Darling, Watson, and DeWet-Venter statistics for assessing normality are investigated. For these statistics, the approximate slopes are determined, and the equivalence of ratios of limiting approximate slopes to limiting Pitman efficiencies is established. From relative efficiency comparisons, the Cramér-von Mises and Watson statistics perform rather poorly; choice between the Anderson-Darling and DeWet-Venter statistics should be made on the basis of anticipated alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson, I. G. (1965). On the stochastic comparison of tests of hypotheses, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

  2. Bahadur, R. R. (1960). Stochastic comparison of tests,Ann. Math. Statist.,31, 276–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahadur, R. R. (1967). Rates of convergence of estimates and test statistics,Ann. Math. Statist.,38, 303–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahadur, R. R. (1971).Some Limit Theorems in Statistics, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Beran, R. J. (1975). Tail probabilities of noncentral quadratic forms,Ann. Statist.,3, 969–974.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Csorgö, M. and Révész, P. (1981).Strong Approximations in Probability and Statistics, Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. DeWet, T. and Venter, J. H. (1972). Asymptotic distributions of certain test criteria of normality,S. Afr. Statist. J.,6, 135–149.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. DeWet, T. and Venter, J. H. (1973). Asymptotic distributions for quadratic forms with applications to tests of fit,Ann. Statist.,1, 380–387.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Durbin, J. (1973a).Distribution Theory for Tests Based on the Sample Distribution Function, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Durbin, J. (1973b). Weak convergence of the sample distribution function when parameters are estimated,Ann. Statist.,1, 279–290.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Durbin, J., Knott, M. and Taylor, C. C. (1975). Components of Cramér-von Mises statistics, II,J. R. Statist. Soc., B,37, 216–237.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Filliben, J. J. (1975). The probability plot correlation coefficient test of normality,Technometrics,17, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregory, G. G. (1980). On efficiency and optimality of quadratic tests,Ann. Statist.,8, 116–131.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoeffding, W. (1964). On a theorem of V. M. Zolotarev,Theor. Prob. Appl.,9, 89–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearson, E. S. and Hartley, H. O. (1972).Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol. II, Cambridge University Press, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearson, E. S., D'Agostino, R. B. and Bowman, K. D. (1977). Tests for departure from normality: Comparison of powers,Biometrika,64, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pettitt, A. N. (1977). A Cramér-von Mises type goodness of fit statistic related to\(\sqrt {b_1 } \) andb 2.J. R. Statist. Soc., B,39, 364–370.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapiro, S. S. and Francia, R. S. (1972). An approximate analysis of variance test for normality,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,67, 215–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples),Biometrika,52, 591–611.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro, S. S., Wilk, M. B. and Chen, H. J. (1968). A comparative study of various tests for normality,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,63, 1343–1372.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Stephens, M. A. (1974). EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,69, 730–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stephens, M. A. (1976). Asymptotic results for goodness-of-fit statistics with unknown parameters,Ann. Statist.,4, 357–369.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Wieand, H. S. (1975). Computation of Pitman efficiencies using the Bahadur approach,Report No. 7, Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh.

  24. Wieand, H. S. (1976). A condition under which the Pitman and Bahadur approaches to efficiency coincide,Ann. Statist.,4, 1003–1011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zolotarev, V. M. (1961). Concerning a certain probability problem,Theor. Prob. Appl.,6, 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Koziol, J.A. Relative efficiencies of goodness of fit procedures for assessing univariate normality. Ann Inst Stat Math 38, 485–493 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482535

Key words and phrases

Navigation