Skip to main content

Multivariate Hypothesis Tests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Models for Proportions and Probabilities

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Statistics ((BRIEFSSTATIST))

  • 2260 Accesses

Abstract

We establish the asymptotic equivalence of several test procedures for testing hypotheses about the Multinomial distribution, namely the Likehood-ratio, Wald, Score, and Pearson’s goodness-of-fit tests. Particular emphasis is given to contingency tables, especially \(2\times 2\) tables where exact and approximate test methods are given, including methods for matched pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Agresti (2002, pp. 45–46).

  2. 2.

    Richardson (1994) and Campbell (2007).

  3. 3.

    As in previous chapters exact means using the exact values of the underlying probability distribution rather than an approximation.

  4. 4.

    See http://www.cytel.com/pdfs/SX9_brochure_final-2.pdf.

References

  • Agresti, A. (1992). A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statistical Science, 7(1), 131–153.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A., & Klingenberg, B. (2005). Multivariate tests comparing binomial probabilities, with application to safety studies for drugs. Applied Statistics, 54(4), 691–706.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A., & Min, Y. (2001). On small-sample confidence intervals for parameters in discrete distributions. Biometrics, 57, 963–971.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A., & Min, Y. (2005). Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in \(2\times 2\) contingency tables. Biometrics, 61, 515–523.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A., Bini, M., Bertaccini, B., & Ryu, E. (2008). Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters. Biometrics, 64(4), 1270–1275.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boschloo, R. D. (1970). Raised conditional level of significance for the \(2 \times 2\) table when testing the equality of probabilities. Statistica Neerlandica, 24, 1–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. (2007). Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 3661–3675.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common chisquare tests. Biometrics, 10, 427–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, S. R., & Seber, G. A. F. (1992). Estimating blood phenotype probabilities and their products. Biometrics, 48, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. J. (1974). The analysis of frequency data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hirji, K. F. (2006). Exact analysis of discrete data. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing statistical hypotheses (3rd edn.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydersen, S., Fagerland, M. W., & Laake, P. (2009). Tutorial in biostatistics: Recommended tests for association in \(2\times 2\) tables. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1159–1175.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. (1983). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall. (Second edition, 1989.)

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12, 153–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, D. V., Chan, I. S. F., & Berger, R. L. (2003). A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions. Biometrics, 59, 441–450.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Proschan, M. A., & Nason, M. (2009). Conditioning in \(2\times 2\) tables. Biometrics, 65(1), 316–322.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). The analysis of \(2 \times 1\) and \(2 \times 2\) contingency tables: An historical review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3(2), 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1964). The linear hypothesis and large sample theory. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(2), 773–779.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1966). The linear hypothesis: A general theory. London: Griffin. (Revised in 1980.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1967). Asymptotic linearisation of non-linear hypotheses. Sankhyā, The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 29(2), 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F., & Nyangoma, S. O. (2000). Residuals for multinomial models. Biometrika, 87(1), 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F., & Wild, C. J. (1989). Nonlinear regression. New York: Wiley. Also printed as a paperback, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tango, T. (1998). Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 891–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troendle, J. F., & Frank, J. (2001). Unbiased confidence intervals for the odds ratio of two independent binomial samples with application to case-control data. Biometrics, 57(2), 484–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. A. (1988). Tests for differences between several small proportions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 37(3), 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. (1934). Contingency table involving small numbers and the \(\chi ^2\) test. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1(2), 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. F. Seber .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seber, G.A.F. (2013). Multivariate Hypothesis Tests. In: Statistical Models for Proportions and Probabilities. SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39041-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics