Skip to main content
Log in

On the most powerful quantile test of the scale parameter

  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The most powerful test of the null hypothesisH 0:σ=σ 0 versus the alternative hypothesisH 1:σ=σ 1 based on a few selected sample quantiles is proposed here where σ is the scale parameter of the distribution and the location parameter μ is known. The quantiles are chosen from a large sample that is either complete or censored (singly-censored or doubly-censored). The relationship between the proposed test and the asymptotically best linear unbiased estimate (ABLUE) of the scale parameter is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bargmann, R. E. and Ghosh, S. P. (1964). Noncentral statistical distribution programs for a computer language,IBM Research Report RC-1231, IBM Watson Research Center, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, S. W. (1980). On the asymptotically UMP test of the location parameter based on sample quantiles,Proceedings of the Conference on Recent Developments in Statistical Methods and Applications, Taipei, 129–135.

  3. Eisenberger, I. (1965a). Tests of hypotheses and estimation of the correlation coefficient using quantiles,Technical Report No. 32-718, JPL. California Institute of Technology, California.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenberger, I. (1965b). Tests of hypotheses and estimation of the correlation coefficient using quantiles, II,Technical Report No. 32-755, JPL, California Institute of Technology, California.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberger, I. (1968a). Tests of hypotheses and estimation of the correlation coefficient using six and eight quantiles,Technical Report No. 32-1163, JPl, California Institute of Technology, California.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberger, I. (1968b). Testing the mean and standard deviation of a normal distribution using quantiles,Technometrics,10, 781–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberger, I. and Posner, E. C. (1965). Systematic statistics used for data compression in space telemetry,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,60, 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, N. L. (1968). Tables of percentile points of noncentral chi-square distributions,Institute of Statistics Mimeo series No. 568, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. (1970).Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univaraite Distribution—2, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mäkeläinen, T. (1966). On quadratic forms in normal variables,Commentationes Physico-Mathematicae Societas Scientarium Fennica,31, 1–6.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosteller, F. (1946). On some useful inefficient statistics,Ann. Math. Statist.,17, 377–408.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogawa, J. (1951). Contributions to the theory of systematic statistics, I,Osaka Math. J.,3, 175–213.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogawa, J. (1957). A further contribution to the theory of systematic statistics,Institute of Statistics, Mimeograph Series 168. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ogawa, J. (1974). Asymptomatic theory of estimation of the location and scale parameters based on selected sample quantiles—revised version, Mimeograph report, University of Calgary, Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, S.W. On the most powerful quantile test of the scale parameter. Ann Inst Stat Math 35, 407–414 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480997

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480997

Key words

Navigation