Abstract
The linear isobole that is commonly used as a reference for the study of interaction is derived from the interaction of an agent with itself. It is shown that the general use of the linear isobole in the study of the combined effects of mixtures of agents implies interaction between the agents whether the dose-effect curves of the agents are the same or not. It is difficult to generalize the interaction between two doses of the same agent to the interaction between two doses of different agents with different action mechanisms without the use of a mechanistic model. Predictions using non-interaction defined as independent action are generally different from those using linear isobole. A simple mechanistic framework based on the concept of common intermediate lesions is introduced in this paper to relate these two methods used for the analysis of synergism and antagonism. In this framework of lesion development, two agents that have no common intermediate lesion in their action will be non-interactive (referred to as independent action). When the two agents share a common intermediate, it is shown that the combined effect will follow the linear isobole (referred to as common action). This simple framework of analysis is applicable to the general study of interaction between two agents with different types of dose-effect curves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Ashford, J. R. 1981. “General Models for the Joint Action of Mixtures of Drugs.”Biometrics 37, 457–474.
Berenbaum, M. C. 1981. “Criteria for Analyzing Interactions between Biologically Active Agents.”Adv. Cancer Res. 35, 269–335.
Bird, R. P., M. Zaider, H. H. Rossi, E. J. Hall, S. A. Marino and N. Rohrig. 1983. “The Sequential Irradiation of Mammalian Cells with X-rays and Charged Particles of High LET.”Radiat. Res. 93, 444–452.
Chou, T-C. and P. Talalay. 1977. “A Simple Generalized Equation for the Analysis of Multiple Inhibitions of Michaelis-Menten Kinetic Systems.”J. biol. Chem. 252, 6438–6442.
— and —. 1981. “Generalized Equations for the Analysis of Inhibitions of Michaelis-Menten and Higher-Order Kinetic Systems With Two or More Mutually Exclusive and Nonexclusive Inhibitiors”Eur. J. Biochem. 115, 207–216.
— and —. 1984. “Quantitative Analysis of Dose-Effect Relationships: The Combined Effects of Multiple Drugs on Enzyme Inhibitors.”Adv. Enzyme Reg. 22, 27–55.
— and —. 1987. “Applications of the Median-Effect Principle for the Assessment of Low-Dose Risk of Carcinogens and for the Quantitation of Synergism and Antagonism of Chemotherapeutic Agents.” InNew Avenues in Developmental Cancer Chemotherapy, K. R. Harrap and T. A. Connors (Eds), pp. 37–64. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
De Jongh, S. E. 1961. “Isoboles.” InQuantitative Methods in Pharmacology, H. De Jonge (Ed.), pp. 318–327. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dewey, W. C. 1979. “In Vitro Systems: Standardization of Endpoints.”Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Bio. Phys. 5, 1165–1174.
Ellis, F. 1969. “Dose, Time, and Fractionation.”Clin. Radiol. 20, 1–7.
Field, S. B., T. Jones and R. H. Thomlinson. 1967. “The Relative Effects of Fast Neutrons and X-Rays on Tumour and Normal Tissue in the Rat. 1. Single Doses.”Br. J. Radiol. 40, 834–841.
Fowler, J. F., R. L. Morgan, J. A. Silvester, D. K. Bewley, and B. A. Turner. 1963. “Experiments with Fractionated X-ray Treatment of the Skin of Pigs.”Br. J. Radiol. 36, 188–196.
—, K. Kragt, R. E. Ellis, P. J. Lindop and R. J. Berry. 1965. “The Effect of Divided Doses of 15 MeV Electrons on the Skin Response of Mice.”Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 9, 241–52.
Garrett, E. R. 1966. “The Use of Microbial Kinetics in the Quantification of Antibiotic Action.”Arzneimittel-Forsch. 16, 1364–1369.
Hewlett, P. S. 1969. “Measurement of the Potencies of Drug Mixtures.”Biometrics 25, 477–487.
ICRU. 1979.Quantitative Concepts and Dosimetry in Radiobiology. Report 30, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Washington, D.C.
Jawetz, E. 1968. “Combined Antibiotic Action: Some Definitions and Correlations Between Laboratory and Clinical Results.”Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 12, 203–209.
— and J. B. Gunnison. 1952. “An Experimental Basis of Combined Antibiotic Action.”J. Am. med. Ass. 150, 693–695.
King, T. C., D. Schlessinger and D. J. Krogstad. 1981. “The Assessment of Antimicrobial Combinations.”Rev. infect. Dis. 3, 627–633.
Krogstad, D. J. and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 1980. “Combinations of Antibiotics, Mechanisms of Interaction Against Bacteria.” InAntibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, V. Lorian (Ed.), pp. 298–341. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Lam, G. K. Y. 1987a. “The Survival Response of a Biological System to Mixed Radiations.”Radiat. Res. 110, 232–243.
— 1987b. “The Interaction of Radiations of Different LET.”Phys. med. Biol. 32, 1291–1309.
—. 1988a. “On the General Validity of Linear Summation of Dose Equivalents for Mixed Radiations.”Health Phys. 54, 57–61.
—. 1988b. “The Combined Effects of Mixtures of Ionizing Radiations.”J. theor. Biol. 134, 531–546.
Loewe, S. 1928. “Die Quantitation Probleme der Pharmakologie.”Ergeb. Physiol. 27, 47–187.
—. 1953. “The Problem of Synergism and Antagonism of Combined Drugs.”Arzneimittel-Forsch. 3, 285–290.
McNally, N. J., J. De Ronde and M. Hinchliffe. 1984. “The Effect of Sequential Irradiation with X-rays and Fast Neutrons on the Survival of V79 Chinese Hamster Cells.”Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 45, 301–310.
Ngo, F. Q. H., E. A. Blakely and C. A. Tobias. 1981. “Sequential Exposures of Mammalian Cells to Low- and High-LET Radiations.”Radiat. Res. 87, 59–78.
Rahal, J. J. 1978. “Antibiotic Combinations: The Clinical Relevance of Synergy and Antagonism.”Medicine 57, 179–195.
Railton, R., R. C. Lawson and D. Porter. 1975. “Interaction of Gamma-Ray and Neutron Effects on the Proliferative Capacity of Chinese Hamster Cells.”Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 27, 75–82.
Sabath, L. D. 1968. “Synergy of Antibacterial Substances by Apparently Known Mechanisms.”Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 12, 210–217.
Savage, J. R. K. 1967. “Non-Interaction of Radiation-Induced Chromosome Lesions inTradescantia microscopes. II. An Attempt to Detect Inactivation of Chromosome-Exchange Sites With Neutron X-ray Fractionation.”Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 12, 373–381.
Schinazi, R. F., T-C. Chou, R. T. Scott, X. Yao and A. J. Nahmias. 1986. “Delayed Treatment with Combinations of Antiviral Drugs in Mice Infected with Herpes Simplex Virus and Application of the Median Effect Method of Analysis.”Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 30, 491–498.
Steel, G. G. 1979. “Terminology in the Description of Drug-Radiation Interactions.”Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 5, 1145–1150.
— and M. J. Peckham. 1979. “Exploitable Mechanisms in Combined Radiotherapy-Chemotherapy: The Concept of Additivity.”Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 5, 85–91.
Tyrrell, R. M. 1978. “Radiation Synergism and Antagonism.”Photochem. Photobiol. Rev. 3, 35–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lam, G.K.Y. Analysis of interaction for mixtures of agents using the linear isobole. Bltn Mathcal Biology 51, 293–309 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460109
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460109