Abstract
An electrophoretic comparison of proteins in 26 species of waterfowl (Anatidae), representing two major subfamilies and six subfamilial tribes, led to the following major conclusions: (1) the genetic data, analyzed phenetically and cladistically, generally support traditional concepts of evolutionary relationships, although some areas of disagreement are apparent; (2) species and genera within Anatidae exhibit smaller genetic distances at protein-coding loci than do most non-avian vertebrates of equivalent taxonomic rank; (3) the conservative pattern of protein differentiation in Anatidae parallels patterns previously reported in Passeriforme birds. If previous taxonomic assignments and ages of anatid fossils are reliable, it would appear that the conservative levels of protein divergence among living species may not be due to recent age of the family, but rather to a several-fold deceleration in rate of protein evolution relative to non-avian vertebrates.
Since it now appears quite possible that homologous proteins can evolve at different rates in different phylads, molecular-based conclusions about absolute divergence times for species with a poor fossil record should remain appropriately reserved. However, the recognition and study of the phenomenon of apparent heterogeneity in rates of protein divergence across phylads may eventually enhance our understanding of molecular and organismal evolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avise, J. C. & Aquadro, C. F., 1982. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates. Evol. Biol. 15: 151–185.
Avise, J. C., Patton, J. C. & Aquadro, C. F., 1980a. Evolutionary genetics of birds I. Relationships among North American thrushes and allies. The Auk 97: 135–147.
Avise, J. C., Patton, J. C. & Aquadro, C. F., 1980b. Evolutionary genetics of birds II. Conservative protein evolution in North American sparrows and relatives. Syst. Zool. 29: 323–334.
Avise, J. C., Patton, J. C. & Aquadro, C. F., 1980c. Evolutionary genetics of birds III. Comparative molecular evolution in New World warblers (Parulidae) and rodents (Cricetinae). J. Hered. 71: 303–310.
Avise, J. C., Smith, M. H. & Selander, R. K., 1974. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. VI. The boylii species group. J. Mamm. 55: 751–763.
Ayala, F. J., Powell, J. R., Tracey, M. L., Mourao, C. A. & Perez-Salas, S., 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 70: 113–139.
Baker, C. M. Ann & Hanson, H. C., 1966. Molecular genetics of avian proteins VI. Evolutionary implications of blood proteins of eleven species of geese. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 17: 997–1006.
Barrowclough, G. F. & Corbin, K. W., 1978. Genetic variation and differentiation in the Parulidae. The Auk 95: 691–702.
Barrowclough, G. F., Corbin, K. W. & Zink, R. M., 1981. Genetic differentiation in the Procellariiformes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 6913: 629–632.
Bellrose, F. C., 1976. Ducks, geese and swans of North America. Stackpole Books, Harrison, Penn.
Brodkorb, P., 1964. Catalogue of fossil birds, part 2. Bull. Fla St. Mus. 8: 195–335.
Corbin, K. W., Sibley, C. G., Ferguson, A., Wilson, A. C., Brush, A. H. & Ahlquist, J. E., 1974. Genetic polymorphism in New Guinea starlings of the genus Aplonis. Condor 76: 307–318.
Dayhoff, M. O., 1972. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Delacour, J., 1954. The Waterfowl of the world. Hamlyn Publ. Group Ltd., London.
Delacour, J. & Mayr, E., 1945. The family Anatidae. Wilson Bull. 57: 3–55.
Farris, J. S., 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Amer. Nat. 106: 645–668.
Graham, F., Jr., 1979. Farewell, Mexican duck. Audubon 81: 24–26.
Gutierrez, R. J., Zink, R. M. & Yang, S. Y., 1983. Genic variation, systematic and biogeographic relationships of some galliform birds. The Auk 100: 33–47.
Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Chicago.
Hibbard, C. W., 1968. Paleontology. Pp. 1-26 in: J. A. King (ed.), Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia), Spec. Pub. Am. Soc. Mamm. 2.
Howard, H., 1964. Fossil Anseriformes. Pp. 233–326 in: J. Delacour (ed.), The Waterfowl of the world, V. 4, Country Life Ltd, London.
Johnsgard, P. A., 1968. Waterfowl. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Martin, R. F. & Selander, R. K., 1975. Morphological and biochemical evidence of hybridization between cave and barn swallows. Condor 77: 362–364.
Mengel, R. N., 1964. The probable history of species formation in some northern wood warblers (Parulidae). Living Bird 3: 9–43.
Morony, J. J., Bock, W. J. & Farrand J., Jr., 1975. Reference list of the birds of the world. Spec. Pub. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York.
Nei, M., 1971. Interspecific gene differences and evolutionary time estimated from electrophoretic data on protein identity. Am. Nat. 105: 385–398.
Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283–292.
Nei, M., 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. North Holland, Amsterdam.
Olson, S. L. & Feduccia, A., 1980. Presbyornis and the origin of the Anseriformes (Ayes: Charadriomorphae). Smithsonian Cont. Zool. 323: 1–24.
Patton, J. C. & Avise, J. C., 1983. An empirical evaluation of qualitative Hennigian analyses of protein electrophoretic data. J. mol. Evol. 19: 244–254.
Patton, J. C., Baker, R. J. & Avise, J. C., 1981. Phenetic and cladistic analyses of biochemical evolution in peromyscine rodents. Pp. 288–308 in: Mammalian population genetics, M. H. Smith and J. Joule (eds.), Univ. Ga. Press, Athens.
Powell, J. R., 1976. Protein variation in natural populations of animals. Evol. Biol. 8: 79–119.
Prager, E. M. & Wilson, A. C., 1975. Slow evolutionary loss of the potential for interspecific hybridization in birds: a manifestation of slow regulatory evolution. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72: 200–204.
Robbins, C. S., Bruun, B. & Zim, H. S., 1966. Birds of North America. Golden Press, New York.
Rogers, J. S., 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance., Studies in Genetics VII. Univ. Texas Publ. 7213: 145–153.
Romer, A. S., 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
Sarich, V. M., 1977. Rates, sample sizes, and the neutrality hypothesis for electrophoresis in evolutionary studies. Nature 265: 24–28.
Selander, R. K., 1976. Genic variation in natural populations. Pp. 21–45 in: Molecular evolution, F. J. Ayala (ed.), Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S. Y., Johnson, W. E. & Gentry, J. B., 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. Univ. Texas Publ. 7T03: 43–90.
Sibley, C. G. & Ahlquist, J. E., 1972. A comparative study of the egg-white proteins of non-passerine birds. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 39, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
Smith, J. K. & Zimmerman, E. G., 1976. Biochemical genetics and evolution of North American blackbirds, family Icteridae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 53B: 319–324.
Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R., 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Sokal, R. R., 1975. Mayr on cladism — and his critics. Syst. Zool. 24: 257–262.
Wetmore, A., 1938. A fossil duck from the Eocene of Utah. J. Paleont. 12: 280–283.
Wilson, A. C., Carlson, S. S. & White, T. J., 1977. Biochemical evolution. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 46: 573–639.
Woolfenden, G. E., 1961. Postcranial osteology of the waterfowl. Bull. Florida State Mus. 6: 1–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patton, J.C., Avise, J.C. Evolutionary genetics of birds IV rates of protein divergence in waterfowl (Anatidae). Genetica 68, 129–143 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02424410
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02424410