Abstract
Stress debriefing has been used extensively following traumatic events; however, there is little evidence of its effectiveness. This paper reports the effects of stress debriefing on the rate of recovery of 195 helpers (e.g., emergency service personnel and disaster workers) following an earthquake in Newcastle, Australia (62 debriefed helpers and 133 who were not debriefed). Post-trauma stress reactions (Impact of Event Scale) and general psychological morbidity (General Health Questionnaire: GHQ-12) were assessed on four occasions over the first 2 years postearthquake. There was no evidence of an improved rate of recovery among those helpers who were debriefed, even when level of exposure and helping-related stress were taken into account. More rigorous investigation of the effectiveness of stress debriefing and its role in posttrauma recovery is urgently required.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, K., O'Callahan, W., & Marmar, C. R. (1991). Debriefing Red Cross disaster personnel: The Multiple Stressor Debriefing Model.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 4, 581–593.
Brom, D., Kleber, R. J., & Hofman, M. C. (1993). Victims of traffic accidents: Incidence and prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 131–140.
Carr, V. J., Lewin, T. J., Carter, G. L., & Webster, R. A. (1992). Patterns of service utilisation following the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: Findings from Phase 1 of the Quake Impact Study.Australian Journal of Public Health, 16, 360–369.
Carr, V. J., Lewin, T. J., Webster, R. A., Hazell, P. L., Kenardy, J. A., & Carter, G. L. (1995). Psychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: I. Community disaster experiences and psychological morbidity 6 months post-disaster.Psychological Medicine, 25, 539–556.
Goldberg, D. P. (1972).The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, J. A., & Watts, R. (1992).The Kempsey and Grafton Bus Grashes: The aftermath. East Lismore: Instructional Design Solutions.
Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). The Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress.Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.
Janik, J. (1992). Addressing cognitive defenses in critical incident stress.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5, 497–503.
McCammon, S., Durham, T. W., Allison, E. J., & Williamson, J. E. (1988). Emergency workers' cognitive appraisal and coping with traumatic events.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1, 353–372.
McFarlane, A. C. (1988). The longitudinal course of posttraumatic morbidity: The range of outcomes and their predictors.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 30–39.
Mitchell, J. (1983). When disaster strikes — The Critical Incident Stress Debriefing process.Journal of Emergency and Medical Services, 8, 36–39.
Mitchell, J. T., & Dyregrov, A. (1993). Traumatic stress in disaster workers and emergency personnel. In J. P. Wilson & B. Raphael (Eds.),International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes (pp. 905–914). New York: Plenum Press.
Raphael, B. (1986).When disaster strikes: How individuals and communities cope with catastrophe. New York: Basic Books.
Robinson, R. C., & Mitchell, J. T. (1993). Evaluation of psychological debriefings.Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 367–382.
Rynn, J. M. W. (1990). The ‘passive’ continental margin of eastern Australia — the myth shattered by the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: The need for more realistic earthquake risk estimates. InProceedings of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy's Pacific Rim 90 Congress.
Silove, D. (1992). Psychotherapy and trauma.Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 5, 370–374.
Waller, K. M. (Coroner). (1990).Newcastle Earthquake Inquest Findings, Newcastle Coroners' Court (124L/90 W1246 CM-C1), Newcastle.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kenardy, J.A., Webster, R.A., Lewin, T.J. et al. Stress debriefing and patterns of recovery following a natural disaster. J Trauma Stress 9, 37–49 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02116832
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02116832