Skip to main content
Log in

Addressing cognitive defenses in critical incident stress

  • Published:
Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

While it is presumed that public safety workers have always used cognitive defenses to cope with traumatic experiences, this process has lacked systematic study. The author asserts that the use of ego defenses is common, necessary for daily functioning and not necessarily pathonomic or in need of therapeutic confrontation. This article makes an attempt to organize some of the literature in the area, raise questions that need to be studied, and argue strongly for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, T. (1989). Victims of stress suffer from intrusive thoughts.Monitor, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, T. (1990). In praise of rose-colored specs.Monitor, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, McCammon, Allsion, Jr. (1985). The Psychological Impact of Disaster on Rescue Personnel.Annu. Emerg. med. 14: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gur, R., Sackheim, H. (1979). Self-deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon.J. Pers. Social Psychol. 37: 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1985). Secondary disaster victims: The emotional effect of recovering and identifying human remains.Am. J. Psychiatry 142: 3, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, P. (1989). The Repressed Road to Trauma Recovery. Presented at the 1988 Annual Meeting of the Association of Professional Sleep Societies, Washington, D.C.

  • Lefkowitz, R. (1977). Industrial-organizational psychology with the police.Am. Psychol. 32(5): 346–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A., and Ben-Shushan, D. (1989). Forty years later: Long-term consequences of massive traumatization as manifested by holocaust survivors from the city and the kibbutz.J. Counsel. Clin. Psychol. 57: 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C., and Roth, M. (1973). The relationship between self-disclosure, personality, and a dimension of job performance of policemen.J. Pol. Sci. Admin. 1: 3 p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. (1990).Telling Untold Stories Morrow: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Wood, J., and Lechtman, R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization.J. Social Issues 39(2): 719–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., and Frazer, D. (1982). The Stress of post-disaster body handling and victim identification.J. Hum. Stress 39(2): p. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. (1989).White Bears and Other Unwanted Thoughts: Suppression, Obsession, and the Psychology of Mental Control Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (1983). Coping with victimization: conclusions and indications for future research.J. Social Issues 39(2): p 730–739.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Janik, J. Addressing cognitive defenses in critical incident stress. J Trauma Stress 5, 497–503 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977243

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977243

Key words

Navigation