Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The community vs. the market and the state: Forest use inUttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most writers on resource management presume that local populations, if they act in their self-interest, seldom conserve or protect natural resources without external intervention or privatization. Using the example of forest management by villagers in the Indian Himalayas, this paper argues that rural populations can often use resources sustainably and successfully, even under assumptions of self-interested rationality. Under a set of specified social and environmental conditions, conditions that prevail in large areas of the Himalayas and may also exist in other mountain regions, community institutions are more efficient in managing resources than either private individuals or the central government. In advancing this argument, the paper undermines the often dogmatic belief in the universal superiority of private forms of ownership and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, V. 1991. Comment: The “one world” thesis as an obstacle to environmental preservation. InResources, environment, and population: Present knowledge, future options, edited by K. Davis and M. Bernstam, pp. 323–328. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, H. 1984. Management of forest resources in Nepal: A case study of Madan Pokhra village panchayat. MPS Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. 1992. Risks, resources and politics. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. Rules, rule making, and rule breaking: Examining the fit between rule systems and resource use. InRules, games, and common-pool resources by E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J. Walker. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. 1995. How do local institutions mediate the impact of market and population pressures on resource use? Van Panchayats in the Kumaon Himalayas. Tropical Conservation and Development Program, University of Florida. Mimeo.

  • Alchian, A. 1950. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory.Journal of Political Economy 58(3):211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and H. Demsetz. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization.American Economic Review 62:777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1989.Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt-Kapoor, C. 1995. Out of the woods? A social history of local institutions, changing patterns of resource use and community forest management in two central Himalayan Indian Villages. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., D. Warren, and O. Werner, eds. 1980.Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. 1989.Economic interests and institutions: The conceptual foundations of public policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cool, J. 1983. Factors affecting pressure on mountain resource systems. InMountain development: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the First International Symposium and Inauguration, December. Kathmandu: ICIMOD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. 1980.The open field system and beyond: A property rights analysis of an economic institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. 1989.Economic behavior and institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, D. 1988.Conserving life on earth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. 1988. The loss of diversity: Causes and consequences. InBiodiversity, edited by E.O. Wilson, pp. 21–27. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1989.The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jefferson. 1993. Forest resources in a Nepali Village in 1980 and 1990: The positive influence of population growth.Mountain Research and Development 13(1):89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E., and S. Pejovich, eds. 1974.The economics of property rights. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, D. 1988. Not seeing the trees for the forest: A reappraisal of the deforestation crisis in two hill districts of Nepal.Mountain Research and Development 8(4):343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI). 1981, 1991.General population tables, series 22, Uttar Pradesh, Part IIA. Lucknow: Census of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. 1990. The right to resource: Peasant knowledge, protocol of its “extraction”, and ethics of collaboration in extractions. WP 851, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. Building upon people's ecological knowledge: Framework for studying culturally embedded CPR institutions. Center for Management in Agriculture, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1978. Political requirements for preserving our common heritage.In Wildlife and America, edited by H. Brokaw. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., and V. Ruttan. 1985.Agricultural development: An international perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D.R. 1993. Melanesian axiology, communal land tenure, and the prospect of sustainable development within Papua New Guinea.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(1):89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahat, T., D. Griffin, and K. Shepherd. 1987. Human impacts on some forests of the Middle Hills of Nepal, Part 3: Forest in the subsistence economy of Sindhu Palchok and Kabhre Palanchok.Mountain Research and Development 7(1): 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. 1982.Selfishness, altruism and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, M. 1985. The significance of Japanese practices for managing common land in 19th and 20th centuries: A comparative perspective. Paper presented at the American Historical Association, New York.

  • —. 1986. Management of traditional common lands (Iriachi) in Japan. InProceedings of the conference on common property resource management. Washington, DC: BOSTID, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, D. 1984. Using human resources in natural resource management: Innovations in Himalayan development. Watershed Management WP. 1, ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Conservation and society in Nepal: Traditional forest management and innovative development. InLands at risk in the Third World: Local level perspectives, edited by P. Little and M. Horowitz. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1976. An expanded approach to the problem of disappearing species.Science 193 (16 July):198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982.An Evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. 1981.Balancing on an Alp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993.Smallholders, householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. 1981.Structure and change in economic history. Norton: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990.Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and R. Thomas. 1973.The rise of the Western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Director of Census Operations. 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991.District Census Handbook: Almora, Nainital, Pithoragarh, Town and Village Directory, Series 21, Part X-A. Lucknow: Census of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophuls, W. 1977.Ecology and the politics of scarcity. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990.Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker. 1994.Rules, games, and common-Pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., L. Schroeder, and S. Wynne. 1993.Institutional incentives and sustainable development: Infrastructure policies in perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies and clans.Administrative Science Quarterly 25:129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. 1991. Winners and losers in the twentieth-century struggle to survive. InResources, environment, and population: present knowledge, future options, edited by K. Davis and M. Bernstam, pp. 259–167. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, N., S. Bhatt, and R. Pande, eds. 1990.Himalaya: Environment, resources, and development. Almora, India: Shree Almora Book Depot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. 1964.Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 1976.The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. 1982. Micro-level planning and strategies for agricultural development in Mid-Himalayas. Almora, India: Vivekanand Laboratory for Hill Agriculture (ICAR), Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986.Planing and management of natural and human resources in the mountains. New Delhi: Yatan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., ed. 1985.Environmental regeneration in Himalaya. Nainital, India: Gyanodaya Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somanathan, E. 1990.Public forests and private interests Mimeo. New Delhi: Indian Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K. 1991. Shifting cultivators: local technical knowledge and natural resource management in the humid tropics. Community Forestry Note 8. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D., J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha. 1991.Indigenous knowledge systems: The cultural dimensions of development. London: Kegan Paul International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1985.The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. 1988. The current state of biological diversity. InBiodiversity, edited by E.O. Wilson, pp. 3–20. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science Tropical Conservation and Development Program, University of Florida, 3324 Turlington Hall, 32611, Gainesville, Florida, USA

    Arun Agrawal

Authors
  1. Arun Agrawal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agrawal, A. The community vs. the market and the state: Forest use inUttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas. J Agric Environ Ethics 9, 1–15 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01965667

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01965667

Keywords

Search

Navigation