Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary drive: The effect of microscopic diversity, error making, and noise

  • Part III. Invited Papers Dedicated to Ilya Prigogine
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to model any macroscopic system, it is necessary to aggregate both spatially and taxonomically. If average processes are assumed, then kinetic equations of “population dynamics” can be derived. Much effort has gone into showing the important effects introduced by non-average effects (fluctuations) in generating symmetry-breaking transitions and creating structure and form. However, the effects of microscopic diversity have been largely neglected. We show that evolution will select for populations which retain “variability,” even though this is, at any given time, loss-making, predicting that we shall not observe populations with “optimal behavior,” but populations which can “learn.” This lesser short-term efficiency may be why natural diversity is so great. Evolution is seen to be “driven” by the noise to which it leads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine,Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Prigogine and P. M. Allen, “The challenge of complexity,” inSelf-Organization and Dissipative Structures (University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Haken,Synergetics: An Introduction (Springer Series on Synergetics, Vol. 1) (Springer, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Darwin,The Origin of Species (John Murray, London, 1859).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Fisher,The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Dover, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Wright,Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volumes I, II, III, and IV (University of Chicago Press, 1968, 1969, 1977, 1973).

  7. E. B. Ford,Ecological Genetics (Methuen, London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Mayr,The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Dawkins,The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Eldredge and S. J. Gould, inModels in Palaeobiology, T. Schopf, ed. (Freeman, San Francisco, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Maynard Smith,Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. M. May,Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. C. Wynne-Edwards,Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. C. Wynne-Edwards,Evolution through Group Selection (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. S. Wilson,The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. E. Orgel and F. Crick,Nature (London) 286, 604–607 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. F. Doolittle and C. Sapienza,Nature (London) 284, 601–603 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Dover,Nature (London) 299, 111–117 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Van Valen,Evolutionary Theory,1, 1–30 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Roughgarden,The Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction (Macmillan, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. H. Waddington,Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution, P. S. Moorehead and M. M. Kaplan, eds. (Wistar Institute Press, Philadelphia, 1967), pp. 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Jantsch,The Self-Organizing Universe (Pergamon Press, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Conrad,Adaptability: The Significance of Variability from Molecule to Ecosystem (Plenum Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Eigen and P. Schuster,The Hypercycle (Springer, Berlin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Dawkins,The Blind Watchmaker (Longman, Harlow, England, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. M. Post and S. L. Pimm, “Community assembly and food web stability,”Math. Biosc. 64, 169–192 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. Ebeling and A. Engel,Syst. Anal. Model Simul. 3 (5), 377–385 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. M. Allen and J. McGlade,Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43, 1187–1200 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, P.M., McGlade, J.M. Evolutionary drive: The effect of microscopic diversity, error making, and noise. Found Phys 17, 723–738 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889545

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889545

Keywords

Navigation