Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtual reality in vestibular assessment and rehabilitation

  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous experiences on vestibular compensation showed that multisensorial stimulations affect postural unbalance recovery. Virtual Environment (VE) exposure seems very useful in vestibular rehabilitation, since the experience gained during VE exposure is transferable to the real world. The rearrangement of the hierarchy of the postural cues was evaluated in 105 patients affected by visual, labyrinthic and somatosensory pathology in normal conditions and during sensorial deprivation. They were divided into five groups according to pathology and compared to 50 normal controls. Our data show that VE exposure is a reliable method to identify the deficient subsystem and the level of substitution. Moreover, Virtual Reality (VR) would accelerate the compensation of an acute loss of labyrinthine function, related to adaptive modifications of the vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-spinal reflexes, overstimulating the residual labyrinthine function. The residual labyrinthine function is poor in chronic bilateral vestibular deficit and VE exposure should provide sensory substitution or sensory motor reorganisation, thereby modulating the external spatial reference and promoting the reorganisation of the multiple sensory input. The potential for VE exposure perspectives seems very promising when dealing with the vestibular system where there is a continuous rearrangement of different sensorial informations as a result of environmental and age-related changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cobb SV. Measurement of postural stability before and after immersion in a virtual environment. Appl. Ergon. Feb 1999; 30(1): 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kolasinski EM, Gilson RD. Ataxia following exposure to a virtual environment. Aviat Space Environ. Med. March 1999; 70(3 Pt 1): 264–269

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stanney KM, Hash P. Locus of user-initiated control in virtual environment: influences on cybersickness. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 1997

  4. Reason JT. Motion sickness: a special case of sensory rearrangement. Advancement in Science 1970; 26; 386–393

    Google Scholar 

  5. Regan E, Price KR. The frequency of occurrence and severity of side effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1994; 65: 527–530

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lackner JR, Graybiel A. Visual and postural motion aftereffects following parabolic flight. Avlat. Space Environ. Med. March 1980; 51(3): 230–233

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howarth PA, Finch M. The nauseogenicity of two methods of navigation within a virtual environment. Appl. Ergon. February 1999; 30(1): 39–45

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy RS, Stanney JM, Ordy JM, Dunlap WP, Virtual reality effects produced by head-mounted display (HMD) on human eye-hand coordination, postural equilibrium, and symptoms of cybersickness. Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts 1997: 23: 772

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp. Brain Res., September 1996; 111(2): 253–261

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hettinger LJ. Visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments. Presence: teleoperators and virtual environments 1992; 1: 306–307

    Google Scholar 

  11. Precht W. Recovery of some vestibulocular and vestibulospinal functions following unilateral labyrinthectomy. Prog. Brain Res. 1986; 64: 381

    Google Scholar 

  12. Di Zio P, Lackner JR. Spatial orientation, adaptation, and motion sickness in real and virtual environments. Presence: teleoperators and virtual environments 1992; 1: 323

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy RS, Stanney KM. Postural instability induced by virtual reality exposure: development of certification protocol. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 1996; 8(1): 2547

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG. Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation. The state of the art. In G. Riva, ed: Psycho-neuro-physiology assessment and rehabilitation in virtual environments: cognitive, clinical, and human factor in advanced human computer interaction, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1997; 123–145

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norré ME. Habituation, sensory substitution and structural reorganization in vestibular compensation. In: Equilibrium disorders: brainstem and cerebellar pathology. Cesarani A, Alpini D, eds. Berlin: Springler Verlag, 1994; 199–204

    Google Scholar 

  16. Norrè ME. Relevance of function test in the diagnosis of vestibular disorders. Clin. Otolaryngol. 1994; 19: 433–440

    Google Scholar 

  17. Igarashi, Physical exercises and acceleration of vestibular compensation. In: Vestibular compensation, Lacour M, Toupet M, Denise P, Cristen Y, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989; 101–105

    Google Scholar 

  18. Potvin AR, Sadoff M, Billingham J. Motion sickness and otholith sensitivity: a pilot study of habituation to linear acceleration. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. November 1977; 48(11): 1068–1075

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paulus W, Hawken M, Quintern J, Straube A, Krafczyk S, Botzel K, Brandt T. Multisensory versus monosensory stabilization of posture. Agressologie 1988; 29(10): 699–703

    Google Scholar 

  20. Edwards AS. Body sway and vision. J. Exp. Psychol. 1946; 36: 526–535

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brandt T. The relationship between retinal image slip, oscillopsia and postural imbalance. In: Functional basis of ocular motility disorders. Lennerstrand G; Zee DS, Keller EL, eds. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press 1982; 379–385

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu SQ, Stern RM, Koch KL. Effects of pre-exposure to a rotating optokinetic drum on adaptation to motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. January 1991; 62(1): 53–6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cooksey TE, Vestibular injuries. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1945, 39: 270–273

    Google Scholar 

  24. Curthoys IS, Halmagyi MG, Vestibular compensation: a review of the oculomotor, neural, and clinical consequences of unilateral vestibular loss. Journal of Vestibular Research. 1995; 5(2): 67–107

    Google Scholar 

  25. Straube A, Paulus W, Quintern J, Brandt T. Visual ataxia induced by eye movements: posturographic measurements in normals and patients with ocular motor disorders. Clin. Vision Sci. 1989; 4: 107–113

    Google Scholar 

  26. Voorhes RL. The role of dynamic posturography in neurotologic diagnosis. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 995–1001

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paulus W, Straube A, Brandt T. Visual postural performance after loss of somatosensory and vestibular function. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 1987; 50: 1542–1545

    Google Scholar 

  28. Graybiel A, Lackner JR. Motion sickness: acquisition and retention of adaptation effects compared in three motion environments. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. April 1983; 54(4): 307–311

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peterka RJ, Benolken MS. Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway. Exp. Brain. Res. 1995; 105: 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kennedy RS, Fowlkes JE, Lilienthal MG. Postural and performance changes following exposure to flight simulators. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. October 1993; 64(10): 912–920

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fowlkes JE, Kennedy RS, Hettinger LJ, Harm DL. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. July 1993; 64(7): 612–618

    Google Scholar 

  32. Szturm T, Ireland DJ, Lessing-Turner M. Comparison of different exercise programs in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic perpheral vestibular disfunction. Journal of Vestibular Research 1994; 4(6): 461–479

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vitte E, Semont A, Berthoz A. Repeated optokinetic stimulation in conditions of active standing facilitates recovery from vestibular deficits. Exp. Brain Res. 1994; 102(1): 141–148

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bles W, Jong JMBV, de Wit G. Somatosensory compensation for loss of labyrinthine function. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh). 1984; 97: 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grant SC, Magee LE. Contribution of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments. Hum. Factors September 1998; 403(3): 489–497

    Google Scholar 

  36. Telian SA, Shepard NT. Update on vestibular rehabilitation therapy. Otolaryngol Clin. North Am. 1996; 29: 359–371

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Rehabilitation strategies for patients with vestibular deficits. Neurol Clin. 1990; 8: 441–457

    Google Scholar 

  38. Horak FB, Jones-Rycewicz C, Black FO, Shumway-Cook A. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation on dizziness and imbalances. Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg. 1992; 106: 175–180

    Google Scholar 

  39. Paulus W, Straube A, Brandt T. Visual stabilization of posture: physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain 1984; 107: 1143–1163

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shepard NT, Telian SA, Smith-Wheelock M, Raj A. Vestibular and balance rehabilitation therapy. 1993; 102: 198–204

    Google Scholar 

  41. Herdman SJ. Role of vestibular adaptation in vestibular rehabilitation. Otolaryngol. Head and Neck Surg. 1998; 119: 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  42. Asai M. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation on postural control. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh). 1997 supp; 528: 116–120

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dieterich M, Brandt T. Impaired motion perception in congenital nystagmus and acquired ocular motor palsy. Clin. Vision Sci. 1987; 1: 337–345

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kuhlen T, Kraiss KF, Dohle C, Hefter H, Freund HJ. Virtual holography in diagnosis and therapy of sensorimotor disturbances. In: Health care in information age; Sieburg H, Weghorst S and Morgan K, Eds Amsterdam IOS Press 1996: 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Riva G. Virtual reality in neurosciences: a survey. In: Virtual environment in clinical psychology and neurosciences. Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Molinari E, eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

    S. Di Girolamo, W. Di Nardo, P. Picciotti, G. Paludetti & F. Ottaviani

  2. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Romatre University, Rome, Italy

    O. Chiavola

Authors
  1. S. Di Girolamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Di Nardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Picciotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Paludetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Ottaviani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. O. Chiavola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Di Girolamo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Girolamo, S., Di Nardo, W., Picciotti, P. et al. Virtual reality in vestibular assessment and rehabilitation. Virtual Reality 4, 169–183 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418153

Keywords

Search

Navigation