Skip to main content
Log in

Refuge evolution and the population dynamics of coupled host—parasitoid associations

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have investigated the theoretical consequences of character evolution for the population dynamics of a host—parasitoid interaction, assuming a monophagous parasitoid. In the purely ecological model it is assumed that hosts can escape parasitism by being in absolute refuges. A striking property of this model is a threshold effect in control of the host by the parasitoid, when host density dependence is weak. The approximate criteria for the parasitoid to regulate the host to low densities are (1) that the parasitoid's maximum population growth rate should exceed the host's and (2) that the maximum growth rate of the host in the refuge should be less than unity. We then use this ecological framework as a basis for a model which considers evolutionary changes in quantitative characters influencing the size of the absolute refuge. For each species, an increase in its refuge-determining character comes at a cost to maximum population growth rate. We show that refuge evolution can substantially alter the population dynamics of the purely ecological model, resulting in a number of emergent and sometimes counter-intuitive properties. In general, when the host has a high carrying capacity, systems are polarized either with low or minor refuge and ‘top-down’ control of the host by the parasitoid or with a refuge and ‘bottom-up’ control of the host by a combination of its own density dependence and the parasitoid. A particularly tantalizing result is that co-evolutionary dynamics can modify ecologically unstable systems into ones which are either stable or quasi-stable (with bouts of unstable dynamics, punctuating long-term periods of quasi-stable behaviour). We present five quantitative criteria which must all be met for the parasitoid to be the agent responsible for control of the host at a co-evolutionary equilibrium. The apparent stringency of this full set of requirements supports the empirically-based suggestion that monophagous parasitoid-driven systems should be less common in nature than those driven by multiple forms of density dependence. Further, we apply our theory to the question of whether exploiters may ‘harvest’ their victims at maximum sustainable yields and to the evolutionary stability of biological control. Finally, we present a series of testable predictions of our theory and methods useful for testing them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P.A. (1986) Adaptive responses of predators to prey and prey to predators: the failure of the armsrace analogy.Evolution 40 1229–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayal, Y. (1987) The foraging strategy ofDiaeretiella rapae. I. The concept of the elementary unit of foraging.J. Anim. Ecol. 56 1057–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, V.A., Nicholson, A.J. and Williams, E.J. (1962) Interactions between hosts and parasites when some individuals are more difficult to find than others.J. Theor. Biol. 3 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington, J.R. and Hammond, P.S. (1977) On the dynamics of host—parasite—hyperparasite interactions.J. Anim. Ecol. 46 811–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington, J.R., Free, C.A. and Lawton, J.H. (1975) Dynamic complexity in predator—prey models framed in difference equations.Nature 225 58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington, J.R., Free, C.A. and Lawton, J.H. (1978) Modelling biological control: on the characteristics of successful natural enemies.Nature 273, 513–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C.J. (1993) Competition among parasitoid species on a stage-structured host and its effect on host suppression.Am. Nat. 141 372–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P.L. and Murdoch, W.W. (1986) Aggregation of risk: relationships among host—parasitoid models.Am. Nat. 127 696–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins, H.N., Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1992) The spatial dynamics of host—parasitoid systems.J. Anim. Ecol. 61 735–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, E.B. (1975)Ecological Genetics, 4th edn. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S.A. (1994) Coevolutionary genetics of hosts and parasites with quantitative inheritance.Evol. Ecol. 8 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J. (1979)Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, I. and Bolton, B. (1988)The Hymenoptera. British Museum of Natural History and Oxford University Press, London and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H.C.J. (1994)Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H.C.J. and Hassell, M.P. (1991) Encapsulation and host—parasitoid population biology. InParasite—Host Associations (C.A. Toft, A. Aeschlimann and L. Bolis, eds), pp. 131–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomulkiewicz, R. and Holt, R.D. (In press) When does natural selection prevent extinction?Evolution.

  • Hairston, N.G., Smith, F.E. and Slobodkin, L.E. (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition.Am. Nat. 127 696–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. (1975) Density-dependence in single-species populations.J. Anim. Ecol. 44 283–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. (1978)The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator—Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. (1980) Foraging strategies, population models and biological control: a case study.J. Anim. Ecol. 49 603–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1973) Stability in insect host—parasite models.J. Anim. Ecol. 42 693–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1985) From individual behaviour to population dyanamics. InBehavioural ecology (R.M. Sibly and R.H. Smith, eds), pp. 3–32. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1986) Generalist and specialist natural enemies in insect predator—prey interactions.J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 923–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and Pacala, S.W. (1990) Heterogeneity and the dynamics of host—parasitoid interactions.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 330 203–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and Southwood, T.R.S. (1978) Foraging strategies of insects.Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 9 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B.A. (1992) Parasitoid—host food webs and donor control.Oikos 65 159–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B.A. (1993) Refuges, host population dynamics and the genesis of parasitoid diversity. InHymenoptera and biodiversity (J. LaSalle and I.D. Gauld, eds), pp. 235–56. CAB International Press, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B.A., Browning, H.W. and Smith, J.W. (1987) Field evaluation ofAllorhogas pyralophagus [Hym.: Braconidae], imported into Texas for biological control of the stalkborerEoreuma loftini [Lep.: Pyralidae] in sugarcane.Entomophaga 32 483–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B.A., Thomas, M. and Hochberg, M.E. (1993) Refuge theory and classical biological control.Science 262 1429–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E. and Hawkins, B.A. (1992) Refuges as a predictor of parasitoid diversity.Science 255 973–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E. and Hawkins, B.A. (1993) Predicting parasitoid species richness.Am. Nat. 142 671–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E. and Hawkins, B.A. (1994) Host refuges as predictors of parasitoid species richness and biological control. InParasitoid community ecology 451–71 (B.A. Hawkins and W. Sheehan, eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E. and Lawton, J.H. (1990) Spatial heterogeneities in parasitism and population dynamics.Oikos 59 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E., Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1990) The dynamics of host—parasitoid—pathogen interactions.Am. Nat. 135 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R.D. (1977) Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities.Theor. Pop. Biol. 12 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R.D. and Hassell, M.P. (1993) Environmental heterogeneity and the stability of host-parasitoid interactions.J. Anim. Ecol. 62 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R.D. and Lawton, J.H. (1993) Apparent competition and enemy-free space in insect host—parasitoid communities.Am. Nat. 142 623–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakehashi, N., Suzuki, Y. and Iwasa, Y. (1984) Niche overlap of parasitoids in host—parasitoid systems: its consequence to single versus multiple introduction controversy in biological control.J. Appl. Ecol. 21 115–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution.Evolution 30 314–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J.H. and McNeill, S. (1979) Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problems being a herbivore. InPopulation dynamics (R.M. Anderson, B.D. Turner and L.R. Taylor, eds), pp. 223–44. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (ed.) (1968),Population Biology and Evolution. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B.F.J. (1990)Stage-structured Populations. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, P. and Cannings, C. (1993) Evolutionary instability in predator—prey systems.J. Theor. Biol. 160 135–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson, P.A. and Hunter, M.D. (1992) The relative contributions of top-down and bottom-up forces in population and community ecology.Ecology 73 723.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. (1976) Models for single populations. InTheoretical ecology: principles and applications (R.M. May, ed.), pp. 4–25. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. (1978) Host—parasitoid systems in patchy environments: a phenomenological model.J. Anim. Ecol. 47 833–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. and Hassell, M.P. (1981) The dynamics of multiparasitoid—host interactions.Am. Nat. 117 234–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M., Hassell, M.P., Anderson, R.M. and Tonkyn, D.W. (1981) Density dependence in host—parasitoid models.J. Anim. Ecol. 50 855–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W.W. and Oaten, A. (1975) Predation and population stability.Adv. Ecol. Res. 9 2–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W.W., Luck, R.F., Walde, S.J., Reeve, J.D. and Yu, D.S. (1989) A refuge for red scale under control byAphytis: structural aspects.Ecology 70 1707–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.N. and Taylor, L.R. (1986) Stability of real interacting populations in space and time: implications, alternatives and the negative binomialk c.J. Anim. Ecol. 55 1053–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. (1961) Animal population regulation by the genetic feed-back mechanism.Am. Nat. 95 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L. (1978)Food Webs. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, D.A., Wilson, H.B. and McGlad, J.M. (1994) Dynamics and evolution: evolutionary stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 261–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1973) Evolution of the predator isocline.Evolution 27 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. and MacArthur, R.H. (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator—prey interactions.Am. Nat. 97 209–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L., Brown, J. and Vincent, T. (1987) Red queens and ESS: coevolution and evolutionary rates.Evol. Ecol. 1 59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1979)Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. MacMillan Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saloniemi, I. (1993) A coevolutionary predator—prey model with quantitative characters.Am. Nat. 141 880–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W.M. and Rosenzweig, M.L. (1978) Homage to the red queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims.Theor. Pop. Biol. 14 135–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. (1987) Prey refuges and predator—prey stability.Theor. Pop. Biol. 31 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L.B. (1972) On the inconsistency of ecological efficiency and the form of ecological theories.Trans. Conn. Acad. Sci. 44 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L.B. (1974) Prudent predation does not require group selection.Am. Nat. 108 665–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1982)Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turelli, M. and Barton, N.H. (1994) Genetic and statistical analysis of strong selection in polygenic traits: What, me normal?Genetics 138 913–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen, M. and Sabelis, M.W. (1993) Coevolution of patch selection strategies of predator and prey and the consequences for ecological stability.Am. Nat. 142 646–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche, R.G., Bellows, T.S., Jr., Elkinton, J.S., Gould, J.R. and Ferro, D.N. (1991) The meaning of percentage parasitism revisited: solutions to the problem of accurately estimating total losses from parasitism.Environ. Entomol. 20 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage, J.K. (1979) Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by the parasitoidNemeritis canescens.J. Anim. Ecol. 48 353–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochberg, M.E., Holt, R.D. Refuge evolution and the population dynamics of coupled host—parasitoid associations. Evol Ecol 9, 633–661 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237660

Keywords

Navigation