Skip to main content
Log in

Boundary behavior of diffusion approximations to Markov jump processes

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that diffusion approximations, including modified diffusion approximations, can be problematic since the proper choice of local boundary conditions (if any exist) is not obvious. For a class of Markov processes in one dimension, we show that to leading order it is proper to use a diffusion (Fokker-Planck) approximation to compute mean exit times with a simple absorbing boundary condition. However, this is only true for the leading term in the asymptotic expansion of the mean exit time. Higher order correction terms do not, in general, satisfy simple absorbing boundary conditions. In addition, the diffusion approximation for the calculation of mean exit times is shown to break down as the initial point approaches the boundary, and leads to an increasing relative error. By introducing a boundary layer, we show how to correct the diffusion approximation to obtain a uniform approximation of the mean exit time. We illustrate these considerations with a number of examples, including a jump process which leads to Kramers' diffusion model. This example represents an extension to a multivariate process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. A. Kramers,Physica 7:284–304 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Chandrasekhar,Rev. Mod. Phys. 15:1–89 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. G. van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. W. Gardiner,Handbook of Stochastic Methods (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Schuss,Theory and Applications of Stochastic Differential Equations (Wiley, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Knessl, M. Mangel, B. J. Matkowsky, Z. Schuss, and C. Tier,J. Chem. Phys. 81:1285–1295 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. J. Matkowsky, Z. Schuss, C. Knessl, C. Tier, and M. Mangel,Phys. Rev. A 29:3359–3369 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Knessl, B. J. Matkowsky, Z. Schuss, and C. Tier,J. Slat. Phys. 42:169–184 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Hanggi, H. Grabert, P. Talkner, and H. Thomas,Phys. Rev. A 29:371–378 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Moyal,J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 11:150–210 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Knessl, B. J. Matkowsky, Z. Schuss, and C. Tier,SIAM J, Appl. Math. 45(6): 1006–1028 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Weiss and A. Szabo,Physica 119A:569–579 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Hanggi and P. Talkner,Phys. Rev. A 32:1934–1937 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Knessl, B. J. Matkowsky, Z. Schuss, and C. Tier,SIAM J. Appl. Math. 46(3):483–505 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Noble,Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique for the Solution of Partial Differential Equations (Pergamon Press/Macmillan, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. G. Van Kampen and I. Oppenheim,J. Math. Phys. 13:842–849 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. H. Weiss and R. J. Rubin,Adv. Chem. Phys. 32:363–505 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Ilin and R. Hasminskii,Theor. Prob. Appl. 9:421–444 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knessl, C., Matkowsky, B.J., Schuss, Z. et al. Boundary behavior of diffusion approximations to Markov jump processes. J Stat Phys 45, 245–266 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01033090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01033090

Key words

Navigation