Skip to main content
Log in

Heteromerikarpie und Fruchtpolymorphismus beiMicroparacaryum, gen. nov., (Boraginaceae)

Heteromericarpy and fruit polymorphism inMicroparacaryum, gen. nov., (Boraginaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microparacaryum (M. Pop. exH. Riedl)Hilger & Podlech is described as a new genus of theBoraginaceae-Cynoglosseae. It comprises the annual species hitherto included inParacaryum (DC.)Boiss. andMattiastrum (Boiss.)Brand. Distribution maps are given for all 3 genera.Microparacaryum consists of two species,M. salsum (Boiss.)Hilger & Podlech (M. s.) andM. intermedium (Fresen.)Hilger & Podlech (M. i.). ParticularlyM. i. is a very variable species, and most of the species formerly recognized belong here. Scattered all over the range of the genus, plants occur with nutlets exhibiting flat or incurved marginal wings, often in mixed populations. This fruit polymorphism is taxonomically treated by recognizing “formae”. In addition, the following new infraspecific taxa and combinations are described:M. i. var.intermedium formaparacaryoides Hilger & Podlech,M. i. var.stellatum (H. Riedl)Hilger & Podlech,M. i. var.stellatum formamattiastroides Hilger & Podlech,M. s. formamattiastroides Hilger & Podlech.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Barbier, E., Mathez, J., 1973: Contribution à l'étude des Cynoglossées (Boraginacées):Pardoglossum, genre nouveau du Bassin méditerranéen occidental. — Candollea28, 281–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, A., 1915: Neue Borraginaceen-Studien III. — Feddes Repert.14, 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1921:Borraginaceae-Borraginoideae-Cynoglosseae. — InEngler, A., (Ed.): Das Pflanzenreich4, 252 (Heft78).

  • De Candolle, A., 1846:Borraginaceae. — InDe Candolle, A., (Ed.): Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis10, 1–178. — Paris: V. Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, L. T., 1958: Dimorphism in the fruits ofPlectritis and its taxonomic implication. — Brittonia10, 14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers Ware, D. M., 1983: Genetic fruit polymorphism in North AmericanValerianella (Valerianaceae) and its taxonomic implication. — Syst. Bot.8, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinbrun-Dothan, N., 1978: Flora Palaestina3. — Jerusalem: Jerusalem Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloskokov, V., 1975: Sistematičeskie zametki po roduLappula Gilib. Kazahstana (DeLappula Gilib. Kazachstaniae Notae Systematicae). — In: Flora i Rastitel'nye Resursy Kazahstana (Red.G. Z. Bijašev), 69–80. — Alma Ata: „Nauka“.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, W., (Ed.), 1981: Med-Checklist Notulae, 3. — Willdenowia11, 23–43.

  • Hilger, H. H., 1981a: Entwicklungstendenzen im Fruchtbau der anemochoren BoraginaceengattungenMattiastrum undParacaryum. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.94, 677–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981b: Die Perikarpentwicklung geflügelter Klausen aus demParacaryum-Verwandtschaftskreis (Cynoglosseae, Boraginaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.138, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Richter, U., 1982: Untersuchungen zur Ausbildung der Klausen und ihrer Oberflächenskulpturen beiParacaryum intermedium (Boraginaceae) aus Jordanien. — Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen57, 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber-Morath, A., 1981: Ergänzungen zuP. H. Davis' “Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands” 1–6 (1965–1978). II. — Candollea36, 77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. S., 1955: Morphism and evolution. — Heredity9, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, I. M., 1924: Studies in theBoraginaceae III. — Contrib. Gray Herb. Harvard. Univ. Ser. Nova73, 42–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi, S. M. A., 1970, 1971: A revision of theBoraginaceae of West Pakistan and Kashmir. — J. Arnold Arb.51, 133–184, 367–402, 499–520 (1970);52, 110–136, 334–363, 486–522, 666–690 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kürschner, H., 1980: Vegetationsanalytische und physiognomisch-ökologische Untersuchungen in Hochgebirgen Südost- und Zentral-Anatoliens (Aladağları, Erciyes Dağı, Türkei). — Diss. Tübingen.

  • Lipsky, W., 1910: Contributio ad floram Asiae Mediae III. — Acta Hort. Petrop.26, 453–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migahid, A. M., 1978: Flora of Saudi Arabia1, Dicotyledons; ed. 2. — Riyadh: Riyadh University Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, R. R., 1977:Paracaryum. — InDavis, P. H., (Ed.): Materials for a flora of Turkey, XXXIV. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb.35, 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978:Paracaryum. — InDavis, P. H., (Ed.): Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands6. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouterde, P., 1978: Nouvelle Flore du Liban et de la Syrie3 (Charpin, A., Greuter, W., Eds.). — Beyrouth: Dar El-Machreq Éditeurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrzakulov, P., 1975: Species novaParacaryum Boiss. e Karatau. — Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Kaz. SSR9, 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, N. V., 1964: Flora of Kazakhstan7. — Alma Ata.

  • Podlech, D., Anders, O., 1977: Florula des Wakhan (Nordost-Afghanistan). — Mitt. Bot. München13, 361–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, M. G., 1974:Boraginaceae. — InŠiškin, B. K., (Ed.): Flora of the U.S.S.R.19,Tubiflorae. Engl. Übersetzung. — Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechinger, K. H., 1951:Borraginaceae Novae Orientales. — Ann. Nat.-Hist. Mus. Wien58, 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1964: Flora of Lowland Iraq. — Weinheim: Cramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: Plants of the Touran Protected Area, Iran. — Iran. Jour. Bot.1, 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Wendelbo, P., 1976: Plants of the Kavir Protected Region, Iran. — Iran. Jour. Bot.1, 23–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, H., 1963:Borraginaceae. — InKøie, M., Rechinger, K. H., (Eds.): Symbolae Afghanicae V. — Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk.13/4, 183–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1967:Boraginaceae. — InRechinger, K. H., (Ed.): Flora Iranica48. — Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970: Notizen zur Orient-Flora. Über zwei verkannteParacaryum-Arten der UdSSR. — Österr. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturw. Kl., Anz.106, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, H., 1942: Die Hohlschuppen derBoraginaceae. — Bot. Jahrb.72, 303–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A., 1978: Relationships betweenParacaryum intermedium andParacaryum boissieri on Sinai, and the generic separation ofParacaryum andMattiastrum (Boraginaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.129, 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorger, F., Buchner, P., 1983: Beiträge zur Flora der Türkei IV. — Linzer Biol. Beitr.14, 167–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, D. H., 1975: The taxonomic treatment of polymorphic variation. — Watsonia10, 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, M., 1973: Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle East. 2 Vols. — Stuttgart: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilger, H.H., Balzer, M., Frey, W. et al. Heteromerikarpie und Fruchtpolymorphismus beiMicroparacaryum, gen. nov., (Boraginaceae). Pl Syst Evol 148, 291–312 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985930

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985930

Key words

Navigation